|
|
iWork 08, Pages, "export to HTML"
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
ARGH! And wtf, Apple? Why did the "export to HTML" feature get removed from Pages? >.<
That needs to come back immediately
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: The back of the room
Status:
Offline
|
|
iWeb not good enough for you? Or TextEdit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by zro
iWeb not good enough for you?
Hell no.
Nor that.
Do you have any idea what I'm talking about or are you just trying be funny?
What's next? Apple will remove the ability to add your own mail servers to Mail and force you to use .mac?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Central Texas
Status:
Offline
|
|
Really? That is wack. I mean really stupid. I used that all the time as a low-bandwidth version of my PDF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Crystal, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, not good.
I would have also liked an option for the Word Export to choose between the two versions. Pages opens the new format it would have been nice to save it as that format. Or maybe its there and I haven't paid that much attention and found it.
dw9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by zro
iWeb not good enough for you? Or TextEdit?
iWeb is in iLife and I noticed there was no export to HTML in Pages also. That's just insane this day in age.
(
Last edited by dru; Aug 15, 2007 at 03:50 PM.
Reason: corrected word order)
|
20" iMac C2D/2.4GHz 3GB RAM 10.6.8 (10H549)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just save a copy in Pages ’06 format, open that one with Pages ’06 and export there to HTML. I mean ... tell Apple.
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because HTML exported by word processing programs tends to be messy and horrible? (in general, anyway. I haven't specifically seen the HTML that Pages '06 exports, but I doubt it's great)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
The HTML from Pages '06 was pretty embarrassing. The pages generally looked okay though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Would people really be exporting from Pages thinking they were getting a great and well-coded page though? Isn't the purpose of the feature just for basic quick and dirty utility?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by PurpleGiant
The HTML from Pages '06 was pretty embarrassing.
I admit I haven't checked, but I can't imagine it was as bad as Word's HTML export.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|