|
|
New G5 configurations?
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: somewhere in the old continent
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi there,
I work for a reseller, and our internal sales representative was informed bij our Apple distributor that the standard G5 configurations will be altered tomorrow. This is what they told us:
- lower price on the 1.6
- new dual 1.8 due to shipping problems on the dual 2.0
Can anyone confirm this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by yannb:
Hi there,
I work for a reseller, and our internal sales representative was informed bij our Apple distributor that the standard G5 configurations will be altered tomorrow. This is what they told us:
- lower price on the 1.6
- new dual 1.8 due to shipping problems on the dual 2.0
Can anyone confirm this?
It wouldn't surprise me if they did it, and if they lower the 2Ghz prize as well, I will buy one in an instant!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: RTP, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sounds like it's going to happen. That's pretty sweet, though I'm still not sure I can fork out $2500 for a dualie. Would this nix any chance at HW upgrades at MWSF?
What about the new displays? I was waiting on those, too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
ThinkSecret now says:
"According to reports, the new Dual-1.8GHz model will be priced at $2,499, the Dual-2GHz model will remain at $2,999, the single 1.8GHz model will drop to $2,099 from $2,399, and the single 1.6GHz model will drop to $1,799 from $1,999."
I still don't buy the bit about the 20" iMac, but who knows...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Atlanta
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
ThinkSecret now says:
"According to reports, the new Dual-1.8GHz model will be priced at $2,499, the Dual-2GHz model will remain at $2,999, the single 1.8GHz model will drop to $2,099 from $2,399, and the single 1.6GHz model will drop to $1,799 from $1,999.
I have a dual 2GHz, but would have bought the dual 1.8GHz at $500 cheaper. There's your ram stuffing right there.
|
MacBook Pro C2D 2.16GHz 2GB 120GB OSX 10.4.9, Boot Camp 1.2, Vista Home Premium
mac mini 1.42, 60GB 7200rpm, 1GB (sold), dual 2GHz/G5 (sold), Powerbook 15" 1GHz (sold)
dual G4 800MHz (sold), dual G4 450MHz (sold), G4 450MHz (sold), Powerbook Pismo G3 500MHz (sold)
PowerMac 9500 132MHz 601, dual 180MHz 604e, Newer G3 400MHz (in closet)
Powermac 7100 80MHz (sold), Powermac 7100 66MHz (sold)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Photoshop is okay on my Dual GHz SlowSilver�
Illustrator is okay
Right now the "only" reason to consider jumping to a G5 is Cinema
Unfortunately Cinema isn't optimized for G5 yet so that it's not up to 3X as fast as my SlowSilver� as is indicated by Cinebench.....
Keep the words short.....No G5 aware Cinema, no new hardware purchase = Apple, no business from me (yet)
|
MacPro 2.66, 5GB RAM, 250GB + 160GB HDs, 23" Cinema Display
MacBook Pro 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM (from work)
MacBook (White) 1.83GHz, 2GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
I still don't buy the bit about the 20" iMac, but who knows...
Yeah, it doesn't make a lot of sense. You'd have a great monitor that's permanently stuck on a slow machine. Unless it has a 1.4 or 1.6 G5, which I doubt.
The dual 1.8 G5, on the other hand, is long overdue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Always within bluetooth range
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
I still don't buy the bit about the 20" iMac, but who knows...
Why not ? If I had the money, that'd probably be the machine I'd buy. I don't really need all the speed of a tower .. but a 20" LCD would be great. If it costs, say, 2k that'd still be a full 1100 cheaper than the "new" price on a 1.6 G5 + 20" Apple display.
I don't think it'd be a "super hot" seller ... but there is a niche of people who would want one. That was part of the promise of the new iMac design ... that we'd have a choice of monitor sizes that we didn't have with the CRT iMacs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: somewhere, anywhere
Status:
Offline
|
|
2.4 GHZ Single and Dual announced MacWorld January.
No speed bumps until then. Price drops maybe. Dual 2GHZ $2499 Single 1.8 $1999
Single 1.6 $1599
Maybe with radeon 9600 standard
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Globetrotting
Status:
Offline
|
|
Store is down now so something is happening.
|
If a group of mimes are miming a forest and one falls down, does he make a sound?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Krusty:
Why not ? If I had the money, that'd probably be the machine I'd buy. I don't really need all the speed of a tower .. but a 20" LCD would be great. If it costs, say, 2k that'd still be a full 1100 cheaper than the "new" price on a 1.6 G5 + 20" Apple display.
I don't think it'd be a "super hot" seller ... but there is a niche of people who would want one. That was part of the promise of the new iMac design ... that we'd have a choice of monitor sizes that we didn't have with the CRT iMacs.
Well, they did release a 20".
What's wrong with it? When the iMac becomes obsolete (which is arguably already now considering it's a desktop with a G4 1.25), the $$$ screen will become useless. The same applies to the 15" and 17", but at least those don't cost as much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
for the real hackers among us... if they upgrade the imac to the G5 eventually but keep the same casing/connections a good tweaker could move the nice big screen to your new imac :-)
ah well... as there was a market for the 17" widescreen, there will be a market for the 20" as well. and besides, for most people at the consumer level that 1.25G G4 will perform great for their tasks such as email, iPhoto, some iMovie/iDVD work... that G4 will outlive a lot of other systems, and the screen with it!
btw. i absolutely love that dual-1.8... am i the only one thinking it will be the biggest seller by far of the apple G5 line?
|
MacBook Pro 13"/2.66 (09/2010), Mac Mini c2d/1.83 (01/2008)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mousehouse:
ah well... as there was a market for the 17" widescreen, there will be a market for the 20" as well. and besides, for most people at the consumer level that 1.25G G4 will perform great for their tasks such as email, iPhoto, some iMovie/iDVD work... that G4 will outlive a lot of other systems, and the screen with it!
A G4 1.25 is quite slow in iMovie/iDVD.
btw. i absolutely love that dual-1.8... am i the only one thinking it will be the biggest seller by far of the apple G5 line?
I agree. It's too bad they don't have a single 1.8 though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
Well, they did release a 20".
What's wrong with it? When the iMac becomes obsolete (which is arguably already now considering it's a desktop with a G4 1.25), the $$$ screen will become useless. The same applies to the 15" and 17", but at least those don't cost as much.
Someone will have (G5 or higher) upgrades for them.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by MacNStein:
Someone will have (G5 or higher) upgrades for them.
You mean like they have for the G4 Power Macs?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Eug:
It's too bad they don't have a single 1.8 though.
This is the lineup and price plan that they should have released originally. There is a real benefit to jumping from the low end to the medium, and the high-end is for people who need to eek out the last bit of performance. The dual-1.8 is a real performer and is now the best deal.
I'm still glad to have my dual-2GHz/Radeon 9800 though.
|
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pretty cool news. The 20" iMac for those who want the big screen, the Dual 1.8 G5s for more power. Maybe we'll see dual G5s across the board by January/February.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Uusally the middle of the line PowerMac is the best deal. The original config was skewed for G5s and has now been corrected. I also would have bought a dual 1.8 instead of a Dual 2.0 for a $500 savings.
Originally posted by sodamnregistered2:
I have a dual 2GHz, but would have bought the dual 1.8GHz at $500 cheaper. There's your ram stuffing right there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Berkeley, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only difference between the dual 1.8s and the dual 2.0s, other than clock speed, is the video card. An extra $50 gets you the Radeon 9600 in a custom-ordered configuration.
I think the dual 1.8/9600 for $2550 is a heck of a value ... probably more than 90% of the performance of the 2.0 dualie (a negligible difference for most users) for 85% of the price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|