|
|
Macbook vs. Sony VAIO Z vs. Sony VAIO SR
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: infront of my lousy 4 year old 1.4GHz PC!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm getting a new laptop. Should I get a Sony VAIO or a Macbook
Processor...
Macbook: 2.4Ghz
Sony VAIO Z: 2.53Ghz
Sony VAIO SR: 2.53Ghz - 2.8Ghz
RAM: All can go up to 4.
Frontside Bus:
MB: 800Mhz
VAIO Z: 1066Mhz
VAIO SR: 1066Mhz
Graphics:
MB: 144Mbs shared with RAM
Z:Nvidia GeForce 850Mbs - 1500Mbs
SR: ATI Radeon...
Battery:
MB = 4.5 hours Z & SR = 6 hours
All have Wi-fi 802.11n
Weight
VAIO Z = 1.56kg VAIO SR = 1.88kg Macbook = 2.27kg
But the VAIO Z has HDMI output and higher resolution. both VAIOs have fingerprint sensors, and Memory Stick Duo and SD Card slots.
Which one should I get? The VAIOs are faster and better, but cost more.
The Macbook is cheaper and has OSX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
Duh macbook.
You expect any other answer on a mac forum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: infront of my lousy 4 year old 1.4GHz PC!
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only better features about the Macbook are:
- the looks
- OSX
- ...yeah thats about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
The reason the VAIO's specs are better is because it has already gone Cantiga. The MB is still at Crestline. In a few weeks from now this will have changed. And then not only will the MB be the superior hardware, it will continue to be the only one of these two to run OS X. But yeah, seriously, are you expecting anybody here to tell you not to get a Mac?
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: infront of my lousy 4 year old 1.4GHz PC!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not expecting people to not say Macbook... but how many VAIO forums are there?
But even when Macs go Cantiga will they have better specs? And the VAIOs have more inputs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Given that half your list of critical apps is relatively recent games, the MacBook (or any other laptop) with integrated graphics is not appropriate for you. The upcoming MacBook upgrade is not likely to change that. A lot of people are going to parrot that only the MacBooks (base/Pro/Air) can run OS X; which is great for people that want to run OS X, but it sounds like you don't really have that requirement or even desire.
I think the ASUS F6V-X1 would be a good option for you: faster CPU than the MacBook; more, faster memory than the MacBook; bigger hard drive than the MacBook; discrete graphics with dedicated VRAM; a tad thicker (1.06-1.39" vs 1.08") but over 10% lighter (4.4lb vs 5lb) than the MacBook; and it has ExpressCard (for future high-speed expansion), HDMI, a card reader, eSATA, etc. Oh, and did I mention it's $1200? Over $500 cheaper than a similarly equipped (well, as close as possible but still with some substantial deficiencies) MacBook. As far as build quality goes, Asus is the ODM who actually builds the MacBooks.
Originally Posted by Simon
The reason the VAIO's specs are better is because it has already gone Cantiga.
Do you really expect the Cantiga upgrade to bring a discrete GPU, ExpressCard slot, flash card reader, eSATA port, or substantially lower pricing to the MacBook? I don't.
Originally Posted by Simon
But yeah, seriously, are you expecting anybody here to tell you not to get a Mac?
You forgot mduell!
(
Last edited by mduell; Aug 17, 2008 at 02:39 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by applesbiggestfan
The only better features about the Macbook are:
- the looks
- OSX
It seems pretty clear to me. Are looks and OSX worth more to you than the greater power of the Sony's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status:
Offline
|
|
OSX is a vastly superior OS, so yes, it is better then Sony's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I agree with mduell and Wiskedjak. Your apps are Windows native and you should thusly get a PC... The aforementioned Acer or a Sager, perhaps. Personally, I feel the Vaios are overpriced for their specs and I lean towards Sagers, but that's a matter of personal preference in respect to what the machine will be used for. My priorities are smoking graphics card, fairly high end CPU, and as much RAM as you can cram in it. Weight and battery life mean nothing to me as 99% of the time I'm at a tech table in some venue with A/C.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: infront of my lousy 4 year old 1.4GHz PC!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I really can't choose. The graphics and the speed aren't so important to me... but I would love it... and I want good battery life.. but I just love Macs and OSX so much!...
Choices, choices, choices...
I'm going to try my friends Macbook, and I'll go to a computer shop an test out the VAIO...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|