Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > macOS > jag - are tar and sendmail fixed?

jag - are tar and sendmail fixed?
Thread Tools
peaBrain
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 18, 2002, 06:30 PM
 
Those of you that have Jaguar ...

1. Is gnutar included or is the same broken version of tar there?

2. Has Sendmail been fixed? (never could fix mine after 10.1.5)

Just wondering ...

Thanks.
     
IUJHJSDHE
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 18, 2002, 07:44 PM
 
Whats the problem with the current version of tar?
     
Wevah
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: State of Denial
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 19, 2002, 12:31 AM
 
I have gnutar on my machine, and I didn't install it manually, so I'm assuming that it was installed with Jagwyre.

I ran diff on gnutar and tar to compare them, and they are indeed different.
     
peaBrain  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 19, 2002, 12:01 PM
 
The version of tar in 10.1 is broken (badly). For example, it cannot do incremental backups.

I'm not sure how you can have both tar and gnutar? Which one gets called with the tar command?

When you "man tar" does it say "BSD Experimental - June 11, 1996" at the bottom or something newer (hopefully)? Tar in RedHat is dated Oct. 30, 2000.
     
Paul McCann
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Adelaide, South Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 19, 2002, 07:28 PM
 
tar is the 1996 piece of nonsense. Developer tools (I think) installs gnutar into /usr/bin, but lots of people 'round here will have a raw call to "tar" taken from /sw/bin (ie, via fink, which installs something it calls "gtar", which is Version 1.13.19-1 of gnu tar, and then links "gtar" to "tar").

So the short answer is "yep, the base 10.2 tar is still the same".

Cheers,
Paul
     
Arkham_c
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 19, 2002, 11:02 PM
 
[dshaw@flybook ~] ls -l /usr/bin/*tar


-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 153244 Sep 18 18:15 /usr/bin/gnutar
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5082 Jul 27 17:53 /usr/bin/phptar
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4862 Jul 24 00:04 /usr/bin/smbtar
-r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 99616 Sep 18 18:15 /usr/bin/tar


Just install the dev tools and you're all set.

Oh, and I have sendmail working fine on 10.2.1 after following the instructions in the O'Reilly article.
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
     
Wevah
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: State of Denial
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 20, 2002, 12:14 AM
 
To clarify: yes, /usr/bin/tar is still the old BSD tar. However, there is also a /usr/bin/gnutar , which is different than /usr/bin/tar . I'm not sure if the dev tools need to be installed to get gnutar however, as I didn't check before I installed them.
     
spaceLenny
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 20, 2002, 03:53 PM
 
So... what was the problem with sendmail?


I've had it up and running without problems since 10.0.whatever
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:22 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,