Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Facebook emotional paper researcher explains study importance

Facebook emotional paper researcher explains study importance
Thread Tools
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 1, 2014, 06:58 PM
Adam Kramer, co-author of the paper involving Facebook news feed manipulation, took to the social media service to explain the importance of the study earlier this week. Since news of the psychological study hit the Internet, many have wondered about the ethical implications of emotional manipulation by the company. Kramer indicated that the researchers didn't clearly state their motivations in the paper, leading to a misinterpretation of how the study was perceived.

The study, which occurred over a one week period in 2012, used an algorithm to filter out information on news feeds of 689,000 English-language accounts. The purpose of the study on emotional states, which was carried out unbeknownst to the users, reduced the number of positive or negative words to see if emotional contagion could occur without face to face interaction and nonverbal cues. It proved that text read on the Internet could influence emotions, based on the type of words used after being exposed to feed that leaned toward one emotional state.

"The reason we did this research is because we care about the emotional impact of Facebook and the people that use our product," said Kramer. "We felt that it was important to investigate the common worry that seeing friends post positive content leads to people feeling negative or left out. At the same time, we were concerned that exposure to friends' negativity might lead people to avoid visiting Facebook."

Kramer further explains how the research was carried out, explaining that only a small amount of content was deprioritized on news feeds, based only on the emotional word content. He reiterates that the items pulled weren't hidden or removed, but merely excluded on feeds. As it stated in the paper, the items could still be found on the friends' timelines.

Playing up the numbers aspect, he states that the number of people impacted by the study is only a small amount. In fact, it was so small that it "was the minimal amount to statistically detect it." Those in the study produced, on average, one or fewer words per 1,000 counted.

It appears that while the study may have been done under good intentions, the backlash make it more trouble that it is worth. Kramer said that he understands why people would be upset, even if the intent was never to do so.

"In hindsight, the research benefits of the paper may not have justified all of this anxiety," said Kramer.

Since the study took place, Facebook researchers have worked on improving internal review practices. Kramer said what was learned from the reaction to the emotional study will be incorporated.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Jul 2, 2014 at 04:23 AM. )
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2014, 06:13 AM
Facebook. Don't be creepy.

Seems to be we are one step closer to 1984.
"angels bleed from the tainted touch of my caress"
Flying Meat
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2014, 07:59 PM
Yeah. You did not need to do this study. You could have asked any linguist or psychology major. This was an abuse of position, and a betrayal of trust.
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2014, 10:23 PM
I can't wait until Facebook begins changing words in peoples' news feeds for certain advertisers. Negative words = aspirin & food ads, positive words = car ads.

You know Facebook had money in mind when they did this.
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2014, 03:25 AM
This guy can try to justify this as long as he wants. The fact remains. They excluded posts on the newsfeed. That they still could be found on friends timelines doesn't matter because the users didn't know this. To them, those posts didn't exist. And this flies in the face of the whole purpose of the newsfeed. To see ALL posts from ALL friends. Reliabl! For this "small amount" of people who were affected by this, the newsfeed was essentially useless, and they didn't even know it. There's no way they can talk themselves out of this. This is just unexeptable. But it didn't surprise me in the least.
Thread Tools
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:51 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,