Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Toyota FJ Cruiser (jpg)

Toyota FJ Cruiser (jpg)
Thread Tools
pman68
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western MA
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 05:36 PM
 
Looks pretty cool to me. I don't even mind the smurf blue.



More pics here:
linky
     
Rolling Bones
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Six feet under and diggin' it.
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 05:41 PM
 
Looks like a dinky toy.
     
Ratm
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 05:46 PM
 
     
Eug Wanker
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 05:47 PM
 
Fugly
     
teknopimp
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: The O.C.
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 05:52 PM
 
not a bad execution of the quasi-classic FJ40. not sure i like the white top, given it is not removable afaik. protruding fenders and signal lights too easily prone to damage.

MacBook 2.4GHz Intel Core 2 Duo | Clamshell iBook G3 366MHz | 22" Cinema Display | iPod Mini | iPod shuffle | AirPort Express | Mighty Mouse
     
EnemyTerritoryish
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2005
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 05:56 PM
 
That's what the world needs. Another SUV.
     
pman68  (op)
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Western MA
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 06:02 PM
 
It would make a good looking hybrid. Wonder why they didn't go that route?
     
nredman
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Minnesota - Twins Territory
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 06:52 PM
 
i'll pay $1 for it

"I'm for anything that gets you through the night, be it prayer, tranquilizers, or a bottle of Jack Daniel's."
     
Dark Helmet
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:00 PM
 
I really like it. Apparently it will have some sort of flat speakers in it also.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
::maroma::
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:00 PM
 
The white top reminds me of the Mini. And like Enemy said, just what we need, another SUV.

And I'll tell ya why they didn't go the hybrid route.. no one's buying them. Money talks.
     
mindwaves
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:20 PM
 
Ugly.
     
Doofy
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:25 PM
 
Have they stopped making vehicles for heterosexual males now or what?
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
rjenkinson
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:34 PM
 


-r.
     
euchomai
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:34 PM
 
I agree, a mini cooper suv type thingy. Ugly.
...
     
Jens Peter
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Aarhus, Denmark
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:39 PM
 


     
nredman
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Minnesota - Twins Territory
Status: Offline
Dec 29, 2005, 07:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by rjenkinson


-r.

i'll pay $2 for that

"I'm for anything that gets you through the night, be it prayer, tranquilizers, or a bottle of Jack Daniel's."
     
His Dudeness
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seaford, Virginia
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 07:36 AM
 
Originally Posted by EnemyTerritoryish
That's what the world needs. Another SUV.
As well as another tree hugger SUV hater.
     
RAILhead
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 08:02 AM
 
I'll be buying one.
"Everything's so clear to me now: I'm the keeper of the cheese and you're the lemon merchant. Get it? And he knows it.
That's why he's gonna kill us. So we got to beat it. Yeah. Before he let's loose the marmosets on us."
my band • my web site • my guitar effects • my photos • facebook • brightpoint
     
Maflynn
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 08:15 AM
 
I really have to question the move of some of these auto execs, they see SUV sales are dropping and with the gas prices not really coming down that trend is only going to continue yet I see toyota, and saab have introduced new ones. Subaru did a new one recently.

Capitalism will certainly weed out the week and the consumer will vote with their dollars.

by the way that is just ugly and looks like a toy.
     
His Dudeness
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seaford, Virginia
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 08:53 AM
 
These vehicles aren't truly SUV's. SUV's are built off of actual truck frames, not car frames. The Saab's and Subaru's and the new FJ aren't built off of truck frames, and besides they only have V-6's. Most cars have V-6's in them, and I don't see all you ****ing liberal tree huggers lashing out at them.
     
Kevin
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 09:05 AM
 
"Freedom Truck"



And I see it comes with a MTX option.
     
Doofy
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 09:21 AM
 
Originally Posted by His Dudeness
These vehicles aren't truly SUV's. SUV's are built off of actual truck frames, not car frames. The Saab's and Subaru's and the new FJ aren't built off of truck frames, and besides they only have V-6's. Most cars have V-6's in them, and I don't see all you ****ing liberal tree huggers lashing out at them.
Uh oh. Someone is seriously badly informed.

1) SUVs don't have to be built on truck frames. The first SUV, the Range Rover, isn't built on a truck frame - because we don't actually have "trucks" over here.

2) You don't need a V8 to make something an SUV.

3) Most cars do not have V6 engines in them.

4) Subarus tend to use a flat four config, not a V6. Although I don't know which model you're talking about in particular.

5) If you stick a 4x4 badge on the back of a Ford Fiesta, the hippies will start whining at you around here. Literally. Since most hippies know absolutely nothing about cars, the only signifier that it's "evil" and "tree killing" is that 4x4 badge - not the engine config. Hippies wouldn't know a W12 from a boxer if their lives depended on it.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Maflynn
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 09:29 AM
 
Originally Posted by His Dudeness
These vehicles aren't truly SUV's. SUV's are built off of actual truck frames, not car frames. The Saab's and Subaru's and the new FJ aren't built off of truck frames, and besides they only have V-6's. Most cars have V-6's in them, and I don't see all you ****ing liberal tree huggers lashing out at them.
That's not my point about SUVs besides what is a true SUV anyways the majority of them are not built on truck frames but are still called SUVs what does a truck frame have to do with the discussion anyways.

It doesn't matter what frame the body sits on, it matter how much gas milage you get. Add on 4 wheel drive (or all wheel drive), and other things and the mileage plummets. Consumers are starting to vote on that with buying other types of cars and SUV inventory climbs.

I was talking about gas mileage. I had a jeep wrangler with a 6 cylander enging. It had horrible gas milage, why because it was a box on wheels,, a 6 cylender car got a lot better mileage then that beast.

While I'm not a **** liberal tree hugger, you have a point and as people start paying more at the pump they're going to be more inclined to find a more effecient car. Your starting to see that now as car companies tout fuel effeciency.
     
rambo47
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Denville, NJ.
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 03:20 PM
 
I recall the concept version from one of the recent auto shows as being much better. This thing looks like they compromised away a lot of the design I liked. Oh, well.......
     
Dark Helmet
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 03:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by ::maroma::
And I'll tell ya why they didn't go the hybrid route.. no one's buying them. Money talks.
I thought hybrid cars sales skyrocketed when the gas rose a few months ago.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
mindwaves
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 03:47 PM
 
Let's focus on the topic of how ugly it is please!
     
scottiB
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Near Antietam Creek
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:01 PM
 
Another article.

From it: The new Toyota SUV rides on a fully boxed frame that is a modified version of the Land Cruiser Prado model sold overseas (and marketed in the U.S. as the Lexus GX 470), which should give it a truck-like ride. But since it is equipped with rack-and-pinion steering and an independent front suspension, it should have decent road manners.

...

The manual transmission model has a clutch-start cancel switch on the dash that allows the vehicle to be started in gear without depressing the clutch. Serious off-roaders will appreciate this, since it allows you to restart the engine without rolling backwards if the FJ stalls on a hill.
I am stupidest when I try to be funny.
     
Fred_Cokebottle
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:08 PM
 
     
Doofy
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by scottiB
Another article.

From it: The new Toyota SUV rides on a fully boxed frame that is a modified version of the Land Cruiser Prado model sold overseas (and marketed in the U.S. as the Lexus GX 470), which should give it a truck-like ride. But since it is equipped with rack-and-pinion steering and an independent front suspension, it should have decent road manners.

...

The manual transmission model has a clutch-start cancel switch on the dash that allows the vehicle to be started in gear without depressing the clutch. Serious off-roaders will appreciate this, since it allows you to restart the engine without rolling backwards if the FJ stalls on a hill.
So essentially they haven't got a clue what they're on about. Serious off-road folks are into solid live axles. And the starting in gear thing is because the starter motor generally has more torque than the engine - good for getting out of tricky situations.
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Nexus5
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: fourth sector
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:26 PM
 
Originally Posted by euchomai
I agree, a mini cooper suv type thingy. Ugly.
"mini cooper suv type thingy" - because it has a white top? This is bullshit.

nexus5.
     
Rolling Bones
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Six feet under and diggin' it.
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:30 PM
 
Originally Posted by RAILhead
I'll be buying one.
You'd take that thing out in public?

You probably bought the first Aztek.

     
greenamp
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nashville
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:53 PM
 
Meh, I really like it. True it has IFS, but what off road style vehicle doesn't need serious modification before it's trail worthy? Sure, you can get a Jeep with a solid axle stock, but that dana 30 POS they slap in the front of those things sure as hell isn't my idea of hardcore trail worthy. When it was stock, my 2001 Tacoma std cab 4x4 on IFS had more articulation than the run of the mill stock Jeep Wranglers with SFA. Sure I've broken dozens of cv-axles but hell you can change those in like 5 minutes on a Tacoma, while on the stock Jeeps if you break an axle up front you're SOL.

Out of the box I think it's great, and it looks to be ready to be modified out the wazoo. I give it 1 month after official release and ppl with have them on the trails sporting dana44's front and rear with 38" tires.

ps: you can see more about the FJ at Toyotas website. A couple movies of it in action at Big Bear and Rubicon as well.
http://toyota.com/vehicles/future/in...n=GM_TN_FUTURE
     
Dark Helmet
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:54 PM
 
The name of Freedom Truck will appeal to the same idiotic rednecks that call them freedom fries.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
Rolling Bones
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Six feet under and diggin' it.
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 04:56 PM
 
Remember Pearl Harbour.
     
Kevin
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 05:15 PM
 
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
The name of Freedom Truck will appeal to the same idiotic rednecks that call them freedom fries.
I don't think the bait car stealers will care. But if you say so, I will take your word for it
     
greenamp
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nashville
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 05:16 PM
 
A few pics of it in action:
One thing I find interesting is that the final version is almost 100% identical to the concept version they showed off a couple years ago. The design is in fact identical, but the concept sported things like front&rear stock winches, 36" tires, etc.




A few things to note: it's not very big at all. I don't remember the exact dimensions but it's shorter than the previous generation Tacoma Std. cab but about 5" wider. It will also sport a 240 hp V6.
( Last edited by greenamp; Dec 30, 2005 at 05:25 PM. )
     
wdlove
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 05:17 PM
 
Not bad looking, love the blue.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
ajprice
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 05:17 PM
 
Just posting these for comparison between the concept and production car. Looks pretty similar to the concept to me, except for the concept bling headlights and chunky tyres. Its even got the flush windscreen and rear glass.

Concept FJ



Production FJ


It'll be much easier if you just comply.
     
greenamp
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nashville
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 05:37 PM
 
Available colors:

Titanium Metallic (gorgeous)

Voodoo Blue

Sun Fushion

Black Cherry (lol)

Black Diamond
     
von Wrangell
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Under the shade of Swords
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 05:58 PM
 
meh...

give me one of these instead:


To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;- and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid
     
Doofy
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 06:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by von Wrangell
meh...

give me one of these instead
Correct. Answer.

Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
euchomai
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 07:32 PM
 
Originally Posted by Nexus5
"mini cooper suv type thingy" - because it has a white top? This is bullshit.

nexus5.
Wow, such prickish animosity. In my opinion, in the first shot, it has similar lines to the mini. I'm sorry that you can't change my mind. Oh, well... I thought we could be friends.
...
     
Paco500
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 10:19 PM
 
It's defiantly not a main-stream truck. I'm what Doofy would call a tree-hugging, SUV-Hating hippy and I want one. But I've always been fixated on the FJ-40's. The lease is up on my Civic this summer and I'm conflicted- I'm going with either this beast or a Prius.

What's wrong with me?
     
Cubeoid
Baninated
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dead whale
Status: Offline
Dec 30, 2005, 11:23 PM
 
Da yellow one looks "coo" .
     
von Wrangell
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Under the shade of Swords
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2005, 12:02 AM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy
Correct. Answer.

I knew you'd like that one.

But that's just it. I don't understand the people who buy these SUV's and keep them in their original state. They are completely useless like that. You could just as well buy a Subaru Legacy (4x4 standard around here). You get the same ability to go off road with those. If people are buying an SUV to drive around the city and some "country"-roads they're idiots. Buy an SUV, modify it to use the power and off-road ability it comes with and drive it in the real terrain (off-road, glaciers, deserts etc etc) and it makes sense.

To those against whom war is made, permission is given (to fight), because they are wronged;- and verily, Allah is most powerful for their aid
     
Kerrigan
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2005, 12:10 AM
 
Thumbsup to that, VonDubya
     
Kevin
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2005, 12:15 AM
 
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
Thumbsup to that, VonDubya
     
Kerrigan
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2005, 12:25 AM
 
I meant the picture, not whatever else he is talking about.
     
Cubeoid
Baninated
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Dead whale
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2005, 01:01 AM
 
heh... Lolz. <--- me Yous guys make me laugh so much. I love yous guys.
     
MacTiger2006
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Auburn, Alabama
Status: Offline
Dec 31, 2005, 01:46 AM
 
These vehicles aren't truly SUV's. SUV's are built off of actual truck frames, not car frames. The Saab's and Subaru's and the new FJ aren't built off of truck frames, and besides they only have V-6's. Most cars have V-6's in them, and I don't see all you ****ing liberal tree huggers lashing out at them.
This FJ cruiser is build off of a 4Runner frame which is a TRUCK frame.
Most cars have I-4 cyl. engines. The cars that have V-6's usually don't have 250 hp, and the toruqe that the FJC has.
I'm a liberal tree hugger and generally don't get bent unless I see an F-350 that gets maybe 10 a gal. that is totally clean and the person is just driving it as a status symbol. I think its tacky.
That said I want an FJ like no one's business. I'm a big Yota fan.

So essentially they haven't got a clue what they're on about. Serious off-road folks are into solid live axles.
Depends on the situation... if you like to ride on fast fire-roads and hit trails without huge-giant boulders (and I mean BIG) you can get by just fine with IFS (IFS will do on most rocks with a good enough lift, also without a good enough lift SA won't help either). Also IFS is A LOT better on pavement. Even still there are no too few rigs that make the Rubicon with IFS. IFS vs. SA is more like a debate in the hobby. Serious offroaders would ask you what kind of off roading do you plan on doing? than recomend SA or IFS.
Real Patriots Ask Questions
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,