|
|
It's too damn hot (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Apart from the fact that you really, really need to know whether the temperature outside is 66°F or 67°F, because you're the one guy with superpowers who can tell the difference, one wonderful thing about measurement units, SI or arcane, is that God invented the decimal system to help us use them when we need precision.
This is easy. It's much easier to say "It's ninety-six degrees out" than "It's thirty-five point five degrees out."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
I have absolutely no idea what that is supposed to mean.
The range of temperatures we experience on this planet as climate, when expressed as Fahrenheit, is about 0-100 degrees.
100 is a factor of 10.
This makes for more utility in the scale because it is granular enough you can divide the scale by 10 and it retains its utility.
By users of Fahrenheit, the temperature range for a day is often expressed in terms of "it's in the 70s" or "its in the 60s", and this contains all the temperature information you need for the day. Each set of 10 degrees is more or less distinct from each other in terms of how people cope with temperature. If you do this with Celsius, you would be describing a range which could mean hoodie weather, or sweat your balls off.
Does this make sense now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
This is easy. It's much easier to say "It's ninety-six degrees out" than "It's thirty-five point five degrees out."
Nobody cares, or feels, that point-five degree. Any context where that .5° is of any meaning whatsoever is on SI, anyway.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
The range of temperatures we experience on this planet as climate, when expressed as Fahrenheit, is about 0-100 degrees.
100 is a factor of 10.
This makes for more utility in the scale because it is granular enough you can divide the scale by 10 and it retains its utility.
That makes some sense.
As I've mentioned repeatedly, IMO the granularity argument is complete bunk and bears no relation to human experience.
It's all learned, of course.
The freezing point of water, however, does, in a very fundamental, and instantly graspable fashion, relate to our experience, where negative values = freezing.
Originally Posted by subego
By users of Fahrenheit, the temperature range for a day is often expressed in terms of "it's in the 70s" or "its in the 60s", and this contains all the temperature information you need for the day. Each set of 10 degrees is more or less distinct from each other in terms of how people cope with temperature. If you do this with Celsius, you would be describing a range which could mean hoodie weather, or sweat your balls off.
Does this make sense now?
Yeah, it does, but that's not reality.
Apart from some semantic value, that's not really relevant, as it's as completely arbitrary as anything else.
"Almost thirty", "over thirty", or "just below freezing" are equally as meaningful. You don't use from-to ranges, but point +/- for orientation.
Also, the argument completely breaks down at zero degrees Fahrenheit, which is WELL within the realm of human experience, even within continental United States (and even within the lower 48, AFAIK).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
@Spheric
subego: I express this preference.
Spheric: that's a preference, you know. It doesn't mean anything. It's a preference.
Where exactly do you expect this to go?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Can we all agree on -40º?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Sanka: You don't understand. I am Sanka Coffie, I am the best pushcart driver in all of Jamaica! I must drive! Do you dig where I'm coming from?
Irv: Yeah, I dig where you're coming from.
Sanka: Good.
Irv: Now dig where I'm coming from. I'm coming from two gold medals. I'm coming from nine world records in both the two- and four-man events. I'm coming from ten years of intense competition with the best athletes in the world.
Sanka: That's a hell of a place to be coming from!
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
which is WELL within the realm of human experience
Hence my use of the qualifier "about".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'll move to Celcius when we adopt metric time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
@Spheric
Where exactly do you expect this to go?
Frankly, I expect you to eventually admit that Fahrenheit is arbitrary, antiquated bunk, and that metric units are the single most sensible attempt to bring some sense to the madness of obsolete and conflicting measurement units.
You're using some of the historical background behind the Fahrenheit scale to justify its existence and use, but it turned out a century ago to have been just wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
I'll move to Celcius when we adopt metric time.
That would require a 400-degree circle. (It's been tried.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by the final dakar
i'll move to celcius when we adopt metric time.
[/thread]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
That would require a 400-degree circle. (It's been tried.)
Looks like I'm safe, then?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Frankly, I expect you to eventually admit that Fahrenheit is arbitrary, antiquated bunk, and that metric units are the single most sensible attempt to bring some sense to the madness of obsolete and conflicting measurement units.
You're using some of the historical background behind the Fahrenheit scale to justify its existence and use, but it turned out a century ago to have been just wrong.
Now it's my turn to say I don't understand what you are saying.
I know nothing of the historical background of Fahrenheit. If that's what I'm using, it's by accident.
My argument is I find it helpful in day to day use. Sorry, but you don't know me well enough to tell me I don't, and even if you did, you'd still be wrong.
I'm not trying to make it ****ing illegal or anything. I personally don't like it. Is that not okay with you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
Looks like I'm safe, then?
If you've never worked with milliseconds, sure.
This is interesting: Metric time - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Apparently, China used decimal-based time measurements (decidays) for "thousands of years".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
My argument is I find it helpful in day to day use. Sorry, but you don't know me well enough to tell me I don't, and even if you did, you'd still be wrong.
Fair enough.
It's just less helpful than Celsius would be in your day-to-day use (unless you never cook, have no freezer, and live in a place where the temperature never goes below freezing).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
I skimmed the article before posting, and quickly gleaned it's not the kind of article you can skim.
Edit: I cook, but I don't need to know temp, and as for the freezer, again I don't need to know the temp (it's either working or it isn't).
I understand the appeal of having the freezing temp of water be a nice round number, but remembering 32º is freezing is about as difficult as remembering 12 = midday or midnight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Fair enough.
It's just less helpful than Celsius would be in your day-to-day use (unless you never cook, have no freezer, and live in a place where the temperature never goes below freezing).
Or, you know, since I'm not checking my freezer temp every day like I am with the weather, do a bit of math when that comes up.
As I stated in my OP, I do have an appreciation for SI units. I would never do anything which required more than the simplest calculations in anything else. Temperature included.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Fair enough.
It's just less helpful than Celsius would be in your day-to-day use (unless you never cook, have no freezer, and live in a place where the temperature never goes below freezing).
Actually, running a licensed group home, we have to keep our freezers at 0ºF. Or would that be easier to remember as -17.7777777ºC? You keep a freezer at 0ºC and nothing will be frozen.
As for cooking... (USDA safe cooking temps)
Poultry - 165ºF = 73.88888888888889ºC
Ground meats - 160 °F = 71.11111111111111ºC
Steaks and Roasts - 145ºF = 62.77777777777778ºC
Baking... (using common baking temps)
350ºF = 176.66666666666669ºC
375ºF = 190.55555555555557ºC
500ºF = 260ºC
I'm sure your government has different standards and I'm sure your baking recipes have different instructions. I'm just gving you an example of cooking life in the USA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
As for cooking... (USDA safe cooking temps)
Poultry - 165ºF = 73.88888888888889ºC
Ground meats - 160 °F = 71.11111111111111ºC
Steaks and Roasts - 145ºF = 62.77777777777778ºC
Seriously ?
You know that in Europe, they teach 71ºC for ground meats, which would be 159.7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 7777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ºF. Approximately.
[/silly]
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Denver, CO
Status:
Offline
|
|
The heat doesn't bother me... the humidity on the other hand makes it feel like a rain forrest some days. #southgeorgia
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Seriously ?
You know that in Europe, they teach 71ºC for ground meats, which would be *159.777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777 77777777777777777777777777777777777777777777777ºF . Approximately.
[/silly]
-t
Which is why I added:
Originally Posted by Railroader
I'm sure your government has different standards and I'm sure your baking recipes have different instructions. I'm just gving you an example of cooking life in the USA.
*I'll admit I rounded badly, but I was making a minor point (badly).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
There is zero logical rationale for using Farenheit. Beyond, "hey...if it was good enough for the Founding Fathers, it's good enough for me", that is.
/thread
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
I'm open-minded, but that's a non-argument.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, that and "I grew up with it."
Good enough?
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
There is zero logical rationale for using Farenheit. Beyond, "hey...if it was good enough for the Founding Fathers, it's good enough for me", that is.
/thread
[thread_reopened] Purely your opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
I get the distinct feeling that certain people think Fahrenheit wasn't familiar with boiling and frozen water, or that the idea of units similar to Celsius didn't occur to him.
He scaled the units the way he did for a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Indeed. And Fahrenheit didn't just pull numbers out of thin air. He used three specific temperatures as references: a self-stabilizing brine-like mixture, ice water, and what he called "blood temperature."
As his work progressed, the choice of the top number was adjusted for higher granularity, and to avoid fractions in practical use.
Saying that there is no reasonable purpose to continuing to use the Fahrenheit scale, and particularly to suggest that such use is either lazy or dependent on some sort of parochial "we've always done it this way" attitude is itself chauvinistic about one's own habitual use.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nonsense. I'm not joking in the slightest. There really is no good reason to use it. It's no worse or better than any other temperature measurement in terms of "working with" it IMO, but since almost no one else now does, it's the same as your continued use of the imperial scale - it's inconvenient, it's more awkward, but it's damn comfortable and you're a stubborn bunch of assholes.
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Kelvin is what we should all be using really. Thats the agreed international scientific standard. Celsius is sort of allowed because its like a rebranded Kelvin with the same 'size' degrees.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
Actually, running a licensed group home, we have to keep our freezers at 0ºF. Or would that be easier to remember as -17.7777777ºC? You keep a freezer at 0ºC and nothing will be frozen.
As for cooking... (USDA safe cooking temps)
Poultry - 165ºF = 73.88888888888889ºC
Ground meats - 160 °F = 71.11111111111111ºC
Steaks and Roasts - 145ºF = 62.77777777777778ºC
Baking... (using common baking temps)
350ºF = 176.66666666666669ºC
375ºF = 190.55555555555557ºC
500ºF = 260ºC
One truly awesome thing about the metric system is that it supports rounding, just like yours!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Nonsense. I'm not joking in the slightest. There really is no good reason to use it. It's no worse or better than any other temperature measurement in terms of "working with" it IMO...
This is just flat out wrong. Whether something is better or worse depends on context.
If the context is, say, astrophysics, you want to argue Celsius is no better or worse than Kelvin?
Edit: as another example, not that I'd be so passionate about arguing inches over centimeters, but there are all kinds of places where it's more handy to use a fractional unit over a decimal one.
(
Last edited by subego; Jul 21, 2011 at 12:48 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Nonsense. I'm not joking in the slightest. There really is no good reason to use it. It's no worse or better than any other temperature measurement in terms of "working with" it IMO, but since almost no one else now does, it's the same as your continued use of the imperial scale - it's inconvenient, it's more awkward, but it's damn comfortable and you're a stubborn bunch of assholes.
greg
If "everyone else is doing it" is valid, then so is "we've always done it this way."
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Edit: as another example, not that I'd be so passionate about arguing inches over centimeters, but there are all kinds of places where it's more handy to use a fractional unit over a decimal one.
Noooo don't bring that into this...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
This is just flat out wrong. Whether something is better or worse depends on context.
If the context is, say, astrophysics, you want to argue Celsius is no better or worse than Kelvin?
Um. They're identical, they just have different offsets. There is no difference between them.
Originally Posted by subego
there are all kinds of places where it's more handy to use a fractional unit over a decimal one.
Interesting. Such as?
And is there any advantage over using, say, tenths of a meter (decimeter), or tenths of a cm?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
Noooo don't bring that into this...
I can't help it.
If I could use only one for the rest of my life I'd pick the decimal, but I'll be damned if someone tells me getting an 1/8th of a centimeter is as easy as getting an 1/8 of an inch.
(
Last edited by subego; Jul 21, 2011 at 01:47 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Um. They're identical, they just have different offsets. There is no difference between them.
The fact there is a difference in offsets means they are not identical.
Again, the point here is context matters.
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Interesting. Such as?
When you need an 1/8 of a unit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
WTF would anybody WANT "1/8th of a centimeter", when 1.25 mm is just fine?
How often do you deal in 13ths of an inch? Why would you if there isn't a compelling reason to deal with that unit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Forget it, Spheric. Once people get used to a stupid system, they're not gonna change.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Forget it, Spheric. Once people get used to a stupid system, they're not gonna change.
-t
Yet another non-argument.
Edit: I'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you don't realize you're taking the position fractions are teh stupid.
(
Last edited by subego; Jul 21, 2011 at 02:20 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
WTF would anybody WANT "1/8th of a centimeter", when 1.25 mm is just fine?
1.25 mm is fine if your ruler has hash marks out to 10 microns, and you presumably have a magnifying glass.
Edit: 50 microns. Whoops.
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
How often do you deal in 13ths of an inch? Why would you if there isn't a compelling reason to deal with that unit?
Far less than I deal with 1/8th or 1/16th units, which is all the time.
(
Last edited by subego; Jul 21, 2011 at 09:02 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
All measurements should be in picas, with no fractions. 6 points to a pica.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
This is just flat out wrong. Whether something is better or worse depends on context.
If the context is, say, astrophysics, you want to argue Celsius is no better or worse than Kelvin?
Not sure what you're arguing here - I was just pointing out that, unlike say the issue of using imperial measurements, there isn't really an issue of Farenheit being any more "difficult to work with" than, say, K or C.
Edit: as another example, not that I'd be so passionate about arguing inches over centimeters, but there are all kinds of places where it's more handy to use a fractional unit over a decimal one.
Oh come on, what does fractional units or decimal units have to do with imperial vs. metric? You can still say "3/4 of a centimetre" just as you can "0.75 of a mile" - they mean the same thing. The issue is that 3/4 centimetre is easily convertible to m, Km, or easily used in calculations with other metric measurements. That's simply not the case with using inches.
Originally Posted by SpaceMonkey
If "everyone else is doing it" is valid, then so is "we've always done it this way."
But that's not the point. The point is that everyone else has a reason for doing it. As in, they used to use imperial, but switched to a better system.
"We've always done it this way" is your reason. Even though I think most of you would agree that it makes more sense to use metric as a system.
greg
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Not sure what you're arguing here - I was just pointing out that, unlike say the issue of using imperial measurements, there isn't really an issue of Farenheit being any more "difficult to work with" than, say, K or C.
What I'm saying is if the context is climate, C is in fact easier to work with than K.
Unless I misunderstand (which is quite possible), this is in direct opposition to your claim.
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Oh come on, what does fractional units or decimal units have to do with imperial vs. metric?
Nothing directly. It's an artifact of how the systems developed. In theory, the fact you can carve up SI units into fractions or decimals is a huge advantage. In practice, it's rarely done. Likewise, you can create fractional units with decimal units, but if you split anything smaller than a meter, as useful a fraction as 1/8 is going to require greater than millimeter precision.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
But that's not the point. The point is that everyone else has a reason for doing it. As in, they used to use imperial, but switched to a better system.
That's not really what you said:
"It's no worse or better than any other temperature measurement in terms of "working with" it IMO, but since almost no one else now does, it's the same as your continued use of the imperial scale - it's inconvenient, it's more awkward..."
It's inconvenient from the perspective of being on the outside looking in. But it's convenient for us to stick with it because it's what we're used to. Where SI units "make sense" in terms of calculations and international intelligibility we use them. For everything else, imperial measurements are actually more convenient and less awkward. For us.
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|