Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Gaming > Shouldn't Doom 3 be Doom 4?

Shouldn't Doom 3 be Doom 4?
Thread Tools
Adam Silver
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 4, 2001, 07:04 PM
 
I mentioned this in another post, but no one answered.


Maybe I'm missing something, but isn't Doom 3 the fourth game in the Doom series? Let's see� Doom/The Ultimate Doom� Doom 2� Final Doom� Doom 3.

According to my math Doom 3 is the fourth game in the series. What am I missing?
     
penginkun
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 4, 2001, 10:47 PM
 
iirc, Ultimate Doom was plain old Doom with a bunch of extra levels.

Myself, I'm more interested in the new Wolfenstein.
     
Adam Silver  (op)
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 4, 2001, 11:13 PM
 
I know that The Ultimate Doom was just Doom with a fourth "episode". I don't consider it a separate game. But, Final Doom is a separate game. In fact, it was the third game in the series. This makes Final Doom Doom 3 and Doom 3 Doom 4.

Am I missing something? Is there something illegitimate about Final Doom?
     
Trevor Covert
Guest
Status:
Reply With Quote
Feb 4, 2001, 11:58 PM
 
Giving Final Doom credit as a separate game in the Doom series is akin to saying the same thing for Tomb Raider Gold, Unreal Tournament Game of the Year Edition, Railroad Tycoon II: Gold, etc. It's not approrpiate since it's not a completely new game or even something you'd call an expansion pack. It's a re-release of the original title with some extras thrown in, and it's not given credit as a title in the series. Therefore, Doom III is still Doom III.
     
Adam Silver  (op)
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2001, 12:56 AM
 
Final Doom is not a rerelease with some extras. It is a separate game. It does not include Doom or Doom 2 nor does it require you to own one of these games in order to for you to run it. It does look and play the same as Doom and Doom 2, however.

I guess this means that John Carmack is bad at counting.
     
penginkun
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 1999
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2001, 12:58 AM
 
I think it's not so much a numbering convention as a naming convention.

Final and Ultimate weren't numbered. Doom and Doom II were, so I suppose Carmack is resuming that naming system.

Whatever. As long as it doesn't suck.
     
Adam Silver  (op)
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2001, 11:45 PM
 
The Ultimate Doom shouldn't have been numbered. It is the first Doom with a fourth episode.

Final Doom, however, should have been numbered. At least in plot, it is the direct sequel to Doom 2
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:34 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,