Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Brazilian judge orders deletion of Secret app from mobile devices

Brazilian judge orders deletion of Secret app from mobile devices
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 20, 2014, 07:31 AM
 
A Brazilian judge has ordered Apple, Google, and Microsoft to remove Secret, an app used for anonymously sharing information with others, from citizen's phones. The unusual ruling requires both Apple and Google to delist Secret from the App Store and Google Play, with Microsoft ordered to do the same for the Windows Phone-equivalent Cryptic, as well as deleting it remotely from mobile devices in the country.

The three companies have just ten days to obey the order, reports Link, with Apple Insider adding that they each face fines of 20,000 Real (approximately $8,860) for every day the app remains usable after the deadline. While it is likely the ruling relates just to smartphones and tablets bought within Brazil's borders, it is uncertain whether or not it applies to devices temporarily brought in by tourists.

The order by Judge Paulo Cesar de Carvalho of the Fifth Civil Court of Victoria relates to a proposal from public prosecutor Marcelo Zenker to ban such apps outright, claiming the country's constitution does not allow the anonymous freedom of speech.

Examples of typical posts shared on Secret
Examples of typical posts shared on Secret


Zenker points to the use of the platform by individuals for malicious reasons, including the case of a student being tormented by rumors spread through Secret by other students, as well as a civil action where a marketing consultant found nude images on the service, overlaid with text about him being HIV positive and engaging in orgies. Aside from the bullying aspect, Zenker claims content takedown requests are difficult, slow, and expensive to perform, citing the service's location outside the country and the requirement for the removal request to be completed in English.

All three mobile operating systems have some form of built-in app removal system, with Apple using a blacklisting technique by revoking an app's certificate. Generally speaking, the companies involved are loath to use the option unless it is extremely necessary, preferring instead to remove listings from the app store instead of intruding on customer devices. It is likely the court will receive some pushback from the platform owners before its order is granted.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Aug 20, 2014 at 09:28 AM. )
     
sibeale1
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 20, 2014, 07:54 AM
 
"...the companies involved are loathe to use the option..." I'm sure you mean "loath", not "loathe".
     
Malcolm Owen
Junior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: South Wales, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 20, 2014, 09:29 AM
 
Thank you, the post has been corrected.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,