|
|
• The 2006 MacNN members picture thread • (Page 4)
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Skywalkers new Hand
No, respectable gays resent the above picture kind because they make the rest of us look bad.
Yeah, you seem way more normal, and not very fruity. Weird.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thestig
Yeah, you seem way more normal, and not very fruity. Weird.
Well I know I am not the most many guy in the world but I mean ya, spot the gay guy....
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
ice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Dude, you are gay, and that's all there is to it. You are beyond convincing anyone on the internet otherwise. Those pictures strengthen their case. You are not well groomed. You are gay. Accept this. Everyone else does.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by IceEnclosure
clearly, both.
Ok next one:
Me:
Or flying rainbow:
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pretty obvious to me. I can spot gheyness from a dozen kliks, though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Naugatuck, CT
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by greenamp
Ya know if you really think about it, we all look pretty gay in this thread. I mean, a bunch of guys posting their pics to each other on a Mac forum. Yeah.
j/k
ahem!!!
edit: this is weird, it didn't post me at the end, but way up here instead??
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
This is my fiancé Christina and I.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sknapp351
This is my fiancé Christina and I.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
Are you wearing lip gloss?
You look much more so than before you "came out"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
OK, I look well groomed, I don't look THAT gay.
no, you most certainly do look that gay.
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
edit: apparently the database is not happy. this post (and the one above) is in reply to salty's post about 5 posts below this one
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Behind the dryer, looking for a matching sock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Skywalkers new Hand
Ya, now you just look like a lesbian
With a touch of this thrown in:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Status:
Offline
|
|
wtf, don't post a bunch of twinkleberry pics man.
|
ice
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: fourth sector
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
Oi! Hang on a second, there. “Grønlands Kommando, Grønnedal”? Were you in the Danish defense forces, posted at Kangilinnguit?
No, my father used to work for the NATO. He gave me hundreds of these caps he collected during his visits at all kinds of military facilities. So the day (it was cold this day) this picture was taken I decided to wear this cap.
nexus5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Carbondale, IL
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
AIM: bmichel5581
MacBook 2.2 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo
4GB RAM
160GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
What the hell (most recent):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nashville
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ya know if you really think about it, we all look pretty gay in this thread. I mean, a bunch of guys posting their pics to each other on a Mac forum. Yeah.
j/k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by greenamp
Ya know if you really think about it, we all look pretty gay in this thread. I mean, a bunch of guys posting their pics to each other on a Mac forum. Yeah.
j/k
Haha, agreed there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Minnesota - Twins Territory
Status:
Offline
|
|
i thought everyone on here was gay? didnt we have a thread that proved this
|
"I'm for anything that gets you through the night, be it prayer, tranquilizers, or a bottle of Jack Daniel's."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, that's hardly a super gay picture. Actually when I did hang out with a friend who IS SUPER GAY, and some girl who had like a massive thing for... well actually I swear she was super turned on by gay guys. Anyway she said that she would never have thought I was gay if I hadn't told her "You just seem so straight". That said I've just realized that when I try and have a serious face in photos they never look as good as when I have a goofy grin with my mouth open.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
I don't look THAT gay.
Yes. You. Do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
OK, I look well groomed, I don't look THAT gay.
Dude, seashell necklaces are always a dead giveaway, especially in white. Seriously, you might as well tattoo it on your forehead if you wear that thing.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Those pics stink of gheyness, man. Quit grinning for farking much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sknapp351
This is my fiancé Christina and I.
"I"? You mean "me"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
"I"? You mean "me"?
I actually stared at it written both with an "I" and a "me", and knew I might get it wrong.
SAm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sknapp351
I actually stared at it written both with an "I" and a "me", and knew I might get it wrong.
SAm
I think the rule is to say it as if the other noun wasn't there. So you wouldn't say, "Here's a picture of I." But you also wouldn't say "Me is going to the store."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sknapp351
I actually stared at it written both with an "I" and a "me", and knew I might get it wrong.
SAm
Don't you mean "me"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Hamburg
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
Don't you mean "me"?
No, he doesn't mean you - he means him!
(can someone explain this "I" "me" rule, please? Everytime I think it's "me", you guys write "I"! Now someone writes "I" and you correct him with "me"!?)
|
***
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by badidea
(can someone explain this "I" "me" rule, please? Everytime I think it's "me", you guys write "I"! Now someone writes "I" and you correct him with "me"!?)
Ya but can you do it in another thread. How about the anal apostrophe one.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sigh. Not my favorite picture but it was easily accessible:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Internet
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
Some gems from the last pic thread:
hadocon
Hey I'm famous!
|
20+ year MacNN forum member. MacBook Air 11" 1.6Ghz 4GB 128GB Backlit Keyboard, 4S, iPad Mini
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
hahahaha.
oh wait. youre serious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Nashville
Status:
Offline
|
|
Salty, is that 3 leather jackets I see hanging in the 1st picture?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by badidea
(can someone explain this "I" "me" rule, please? Everytime I think it's "me", you guys write "I"! Now someone writes "I" and you correct him with "me"!?)
Glance up two posts from yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is it "Harry and I will go," or "Harry and me will go"? Should it be "Give it to Sarah and me" or "Give it to Sarah and I"? Separate the sentence. In the first instance, separate the sentence into "Harry will go" and into "I will go." Both of these make sense, whereas "Harry will go" and then "me will go" does not. Therefore, "Harry and I will go" is the correct form. Ditto on example #2: "Give it to Sarah" and then "Give it to me"; "Give it to Sarah" and "Give it to I." In this case, "Give it to Sarah and me" is correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
Is it "Harry and I will go," or "Harry and me will go"? Should it be "Give it to Sarah and me" or "Give it to Sarah and I"? Separate the sentence. In the first instance, separate the sentence into "Harry will go" and into "I will go." Both of these make sense, whereas "Harry will go" and then "me will go" does not. Therefore, "Harry and I will go" is the correct form. Ditto on example #2: "Give it to Sarah" and then "Give it to me"; "Give it to Sarah" and "Give it to I." In this case, "Give it to Sarah and me" is correct.
I don’t want to derail the thread further, but just one quick comment:
That’s exactly why sknapp351’s original wording (“This is my fiancé Christina and I.”) was not grammatically incorrect—a bit odd and certainly archaic, yes; but not ungrammatical. “This is I” is as correct as, “This is me”.
Right, back to the pictures, all!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by scaught
hahahaha.
oh wait. youre serious.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Yorktown, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oisín
That’s exactly why sknapp351’s original wording (“This is my fiancé Christina and I.”) was not grammatically incorrect—a bit odd and certainly archaic, yes; but not ungrammatical. “This is I” is as correct as, “This is me”.
I'd argue it's more correct.
|
"I'm virtually bursting with adequatulence!" - Bill McNeal, NewsRadio
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RAILhead
Is it "Harry and I will go," or "Harry and me will go"? Should it be "Give it to Sarah and me" or "Give it to Sarah and I"? Separate the sentence. In the first instance, separate the sentence into "Harry will go" and into "I will go." Both of these make sense, whereas "Harry will go" and then "me will go" does not. Therefore, "Harry and I will go" is the correct form. Ditto on example #2: "Give it to Sarah" and then "Give it to me"; "Give it to Sarah" and "Give it to I." In this case, "Give it to Sarah and me" is correct.
Me not care. Me think discussion stoopid.
|
Gee, I hope they're friendly..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone here use facebook?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by badidea
(can someone explain this "I" "me" rule, please? Everytime I think it's "me", you guys write "I"! Now someone writes "I" and you correct him with "me"!?)
This whole grammatical mess can be avoided by always referring to yourself in the third person.
|
Nemo me impune lacesset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ThinkInsane
This whole grammatical mess can be avoided by always referring to yourself in the third person.
Railroader has no idea what you're talking about.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
I prefer hate the morons... there really doesn't need to be a second part for the lounge
How very pastor-like of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by thestig
Sknapp's fiance is a honey, for sure, but she don't look like Lauren Holly. Go see an optician Rob.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
How very pastor-like of you.
Unless he starts his own church, Salty has about the same chance of becoming a pastor as Angelina Jolie has of winning the annual "I'm a nice farm girl" competition twice in a row.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|