 |
 |
Post your OpenMark score - OpenGL benchmark (pic) (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: May 2005
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Jacke 
For those mystified by non-results: try starting the benchmark first. (Openmark -> Run Benchmark.)
eMac 1GHz (ATI Graphics), ATI Radeon 7500: 460.
yeah, done that, then the screen turns off...
i think its my crappy monitor only allowing frequencies below 59.000
i have waited, then there was a tick noise, but there was no way to tell what it was doing. i tried a screenshot, but no dice...
so i had to force quit
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
The iMacs have gone from the worst of Apple's line to arguably the best. It's just too bad that Apple will never make a headless iMac tower.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Downtown Austin, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm thinking that VRAM plays a major role in the benchmark score. This could explain why some MBPs score in the high 8000s while others score in the 11000s. Please make sure to state the amount of VRAM you have when you run the test. I for one am waiting to see the score of a 20" iMac Core 2 Duo with the 128MB version of the X1600.
(
Last edited by jamil5454; Oct 30, 2006 at 11:57 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Power Mac G5 "Quad"
NVIDIA GeForce 7800 GT OpenGL Engine 2650x1600x32
Score 12700
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'll test my MacBook later, but for now:
Dual 2.7 GHz G5 Power Mac
NVIDIA GeForce 6800 GT DDL w/ 256 MB DDR
Score: 11,290
EDIT: MacBook scores are up!
1.83 MacBook
Intel GMA 950
Score: 663
(
Last edited by TheoCryst; Oct 30, 2006 at 07:33 PM.
)
|
Any ramblings are entirely my own, and do not represent those of my employers, coworkers, friends, or species
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here
Status:
Offline
|
|
MacBook 1.83 stock configuration.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Downtown Austin, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
20" Intel Core 2 Duo iMac 2.16 Ghz
2GB RAM
128 MB VRAM
I guess VRAM isn't really important in this test, which would make sense because the textures don't really seem to be a high resolution. This test just measures the triangles/sec processing power of your GPU it looks like, which is probably related to CAD and pro 3D work but not necessarily gaming performance.
(
Last edited by jamil5454; Oct 31, 2006 at 06:21 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here
Status:
Offline
|
|
i wonder how a quadro in a mac pro would do with this test.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Imac c2d 2,16 with 7600gt
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Using Radeon 9700 (which the program identifies as Radeon 9600) I get test score of 5018 (1280 x 854 x 32).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Between heaven and hell
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Anand
968 on a 1Ghz G4 Powerbook with a 64MB ATI card (don't know which one).
I upgraded:
8323 on a 2.66 MacPro with a 256MB Geforce 7300 GT (1680X1050).
|
|
Yes, I know I could buy a PC, but why?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
My Score on a PowerMac G4 1GHz with a Radeon 9800 Pro
(
Last edited by Twinkie; Nov 30, 2006 at 07:20 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mp 2.66/ 7300gt 8323
1920x1600
Geez I knew that the video card was weak but come on- being out done by iMacs and MBP's is embarrassing.
(
Last edited by tkmd; Dec 29, 2006 at 11:23 AM.
Reason: screen resolution)
|
|
Pismo 400 | Powerbook 1.5 GHz | MacPro 2.66/6GB/7300GT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Mine goes along pretty much with what Eug posts for dual 1.8 G4.
DA G4 w/Dual 1.8s
ATI 9800 (128 MB)
1024x768x32
Score 10179
Ran just a hair under 10,000,000 triangles to get it down to 9 fps w/ 7.74% GPU overclock.
1152 triangles yields 204 fps
|
|
Gee, I hope they're friendly..........
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
15" MacBook Pro 2.33 2GB x1600/256MB
Score 11751
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
HOME MACHINE - Dual 2.5 G5
opengl renderer: ATI Radeon 9800 OpenGL Engine 256MB
opengl version: 1.5 ATI-1.4.18
surface 1680x1050 32bpp
FPS 9.0 11063808 triangles
final score: 11290
9800 is running at 460MHz CPU / 400MHz Ram
WORK MACHINE - QUAD 2.5 G5
opengl renderer: NVIDIA GeForce 6600 OpenGL Engine 256MB
surface 1920x1200 32bpp
FPS 9.0 5018112 triangles
final score: 5171
Running at stock speed
Should that 6600 on a QUAD really get spanked like that?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Got an OpenMark score of 19170 at 1920x1440x32 on my G5 Quad-Core (2.5GB RAM) with GeForce 7800GTX 512MB vid card clocked at 570MHz GPU/870mhz RAM., OpenMark used the 7800GT renderer however since support for this card isn't official and a native renderer doesn't exist for OS X. Screams in Quake 4.
(
Last edited by p_amadeus; Dec 29, 2006 at 04:31 AM.
Reason: re-did tests at higher resolution and higher vid card clock speeds)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Dual 2.0 Ghz G5 (Rev A); 8 Gb RAM; ATI Radeon X800XT, 256 Mb: 15501
|
|
iMac 24" 2.8 Ghz Intel Core 2 Duo Extreme; 4 Gb RAM
OS X (10.5.6); Grado SR 60 & RS1 headphones; HeadRoom headphone amp w/ Astrodyne power supply
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Michigan
Status:
Offline
|
|
So what I'm getting is that a x1600 card that comes stock in an iMac and the MBP is better than the stock card (7300GT) in the MP?
|
|
Pismo 400 | Powerbook 1.5 GHz | MacPro 2.66/6GB/7300GT
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tkmd
So what I'm getting is that a x1600 card that comes stock in an iMac and the MBP is better than the stock card (7300GT) in the MP?
Yeah. The Mac Pro default configuration comes with a pretty weak graphics card (probably because the thing is expensive enough as it is), but the other two options both make the iMac cry like a little baby.
|
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Marshfield, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Powerbook 12" 1.33GHz w/ Geforce FX Go5200 (1024x768x32): 1411
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
20" Mac C2D, 2GHz, 1 GB RAM
SCORE : 11290
|
|
Vikram
-------
Dont worry that today is the last day of the world, its already tomorrow in Australia....
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi to all
the CUBE is back !!
+5900 with Geforce6200 (1.7Ghz and 1.12 Gb RAM )
and score +6300 with 1.5Gb RAM
[IMG]OpenMark result.tga[/IMG]
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
I win.
Nope. Its a tie.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cadaver
Nope. Its a tie.
Actually I win, check my post it's not too far up...or if you can't find it:
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
GMA900
Score: 557
Also:
iBook G4, Radeon 9200 1280x1024, Score: 903
(
Last edited by Gossamer; Jan 9, 2007 at 02:15 AM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Brantford, ON. Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
I got a score of 11290
iMac CD 20" 2Ghz 1.5 GB RAM
Radeon x1600 128MB 1680x1050x32
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
300 Mhz B & W G3 ATI Rage 128 1152x870x16
Score 93
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: oregon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Macbook C2D 2.0ghz
Intel GMA 950 1280x800x32
2gb ram
score: 903
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
PowerMac G4 867MHz, GeForce2 64Mb, 1152Mb RAM, Dell 2407 screen at 1920x1200 resolution.
Score : 1663
|
It'll be much easier if you just comply.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Carolina
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by gradient
iBook G4 1.33 with ATI Radeon 9550 32MB: 2765
G5 PowerMac Dual 2 gig with GeForce FX 5200 64MB: 1254 <----- Something seems wrong with that!
There is.
G4 PowerBook 12" 1.5Ghz with GeForce FX 5200 64MB: 1411
Very suspiscious how this benchmark app scores so low with Nvidia cards that were neck and neck with their ATI counterparts at the time.
Why does the iBook G4 1.33 with Radeon 9550 score almost twice as high?
How does a PowerMac G4 867MHz with GeForce2 64MB score 1663?
|
|
Web dev, Poe, faux-naïf, keyboard warrior, often found imitating online contrarians . My stuff : DELL XPS, iPhone 6
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: The Sunny Isle of Wight
Status:
Offline
|
|
C2D MacBook Pro 2.33 X1600 256M - 1440x900x32 -> Score 11985
Dual 1G PowerMac GeForce4 Ti 4600 128M 1280x1024 -> Score 4572 <- not too shabby
Would not run on my Mac Plus though…
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top