Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > zap!!

zap!!
Thread Tools
shmerek
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 10:47 AM
 
     
Lerkfish
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 10:54 AM
 
Originally posted by shmerek:
fzzzzz
hm. He also apparently had abdominal surgery , presumably to deal with complications from the treatment he received.
     
SimeyTheLimey
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 10:59 AM
 
If there is someting here, it should be investigated and if proved, prosecuted. However, the usual caveats about allegations not being proof apply.
     
davesimondotcom
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Landlockinated
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 11:28 AM
 
If there are members of the US Military or coalition troops torturing people, they sould be prosecuted.
[ sig removed - image host changed it to a big ad picture ]
     
Logic
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The northernmost capital of the world
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 11:48 AM
 
Originally posted by davesimondotcom:
If there are members of the US Military or coalition troops torturing people, they sould be prosecuted.
Could they do it without any superiors knowing that they did it?

"If Bush says we hate freedom, let him tell us why we didn't attack Sweden, for example. OBL 29th oct
     
Troll
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 11:49 AM
 
Originally posted by davesimondotcom:
If there are members of the US Military or coalition troops torturing people, they sould be prosecuted.
I hope so but going on the Army's record to date, I think it's doubtful. It'll be investigated probably, but there won't be any prosecutions. Remember those two prisoners (low level Taliban types) that were killed by the application of blunt force to their skulls while being interrogated at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The investigation came to the conclusion that their deaths where "homicides." No one was ever charged.
     
Lerkfish
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 14, 2004, 12:04 PM
 
Originally posted by Troll:
I hope so but going on the Army's record to date, I think it's doubtful. It'll be investigated probably, but there won't be any prosecutions. Remember those two prisoners (low level Taliban types) that were killed by the application of blunt force to their skulls while being interrogated at Bagram Air Base in Afghanistan. The investigation came to the conclusion that their deaths where "homicides." No one was ever charged.
That's probably why supporters of the invasion feel comfortable stating that the interrogators should be prosecuted...knowing full well they won't be. It's sort of like offering to help with the dishes after they're already done...you get the brownie points without having to do the work.

Its easier to beg forgiveness than ask permission. Its easier to nonchalantly say "oh well, if they're guilty, I'm sure they'll be prosecuted" instead of setting up open purviews in the first place to prevent abuses in the second place....
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:23 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,