|
|
500 gb 7200 rpm laptop drive!
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like Seagate's reputation more than the Hitachi's at this point, and since I'm in the market for such a drive, I'm leaning heavily toward the Seagate...Same price at Tiger Direct, by the way.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
I paid $80 for the hitachi; the seagate is $108. Plus, the recent reviews of the seagate are very bad: lots of heat, high energy consumption, noisy, slow, and so on. I read similarly unspectacular reviews for seagate 1.5 terabyte desktop. No thank you.
If you look at the seagate ratings, 27% of their ratings over the last six months are 1 star ratings.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mackandproud
Plus, the recent reviews of the seagate are very bad: lots of heat, high energy consumption, noisy, slow, and so on.
Links?
None of that sounds familiar. I bought two 7200.4 myself and my department bought several more. We've seen none of those problems with these drives. And slow? I hope your'e kidding. The 7200.4 is pretty much the fastest notebook HDD you can buy right now.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
^ In support, more anecdotal evidence:
I've had the Seagate running in this MacBook for a couple of months now, and I'm very pleased with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmmm. On to setting up my drive. I'm a bit of a technophobe, and newbie.
I'm running the most recent OS: 10.6.2. I understand I have to configure the drive as HFS+, i.e., mac os extended (journaled).
However, what do I with the "volume scheme" setting in disk utility? It is originally set to "current" as a default. However, should I leave it on the default setting, or set it to "1 partition"? I only want and need 1 partition, but I don't understand what the difference is between "current" and "1 partition."
I'm setting up my disk as an external drive first, then cloning my original internal onto it, then installing the new drive into my laptop. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Volume Scheme:
1 = the most common configuration
2 = what I'd use on a laptop. I'd make the 2nd partition ~ 10 GB, install the OS on it, along with disk repair utilities. As an emergency partition if I were on the road, without access to utility discs.
Format: Mac OS Extended (Journaled)
Options button -> GUID Partition Table
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2009
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just installed the hitachi 500 GB 7200 rpm, after backing up everything using CCC. My impressions:
1. ridiculously fast: itunes opens up in a couple of seconds; overall, apps take about half the time to open compared to the stock fujitsu 250 gb 5400 rpm drive it was replacing.
This internal drive is just as fast, and probably a little faster than my external 7200 rpm drives.
2. it is very quiet. It is very slightly more noticeable compared to the fujitsu, subjectively speaking, although I didn't take measurement.
3. at $80 bucks it is a steal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mackandproud
1. ridiculously fast: itunes opens up in a couple of seconds; overall, apps take about half the time to open compared to the stock fujitsu 250 gb 5400 rpm drive it was replacing.
The average consumer does neglect hard drive speeds because they pay too much attention to only CPU speeds and RAM. Apple still uses the slower drive as default even on their top end MBPs. A computer is only as fast as its slowest part. I also noticed a difference in speed so I think it's worth it too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|