Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > Why no IR on a Lombard w/OS X?

Why no IR on a Lombard w/OS X?
Thread Tools
rickray1
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Sacramento, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2002, 07:16 PM
 
I hear that IR does not work on a Lombard with OS X.
It does work on a Pismo with firewire. What gives?
Drink PepsiOne ! It tastes GREAT!
     
mugwump
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Southern California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2002, 01:29 AM
 
Isn't the reason obvious? They need to sell as many new Powerbooks as possible. Instead of increasing marketshare, they have pulled a Bill Gates and simply stopped supporting this $3500 machine that was sold thru January 2000.

The business side of the company has to justify their bonuses somehow, so they convinced themselves that they can and they should begin to cannibalize performance of these machines.

--DVD playback does not exist for these machines in OS X. They actually tried to justify this by saying that the processor (G3 400) could not provide adequate playback in OS X. A blatant lie.

--quicktime is not supported with this machine, becase they refuse to release the drivers for the graphics card. A slow OS sells more machines, they reason.

--No infared support for these machines. Again, they need to get users to buy new powerbooks.

There aren't MANY powerbook owners who would spend another $3000 to go from a G3 400 lombard to a weak and slow g4 667. Sure it would be an improvment, but MOST owners will not budge, no matter how the coporation tries to dream up greater sales.

[ 04-14-2002: Message edited by: mugwump ]
     
cdhostage
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2002, 10:45 AM
 
I am afraid that I must agree with the second post. Apple is pulling some seriously not nice maneovers in order to cut costs for development of hsofwarte and support for older machines.

Thank God my Pismo works just fine.[/LIST]
Actual conversation between UCLA and Stanford during a login on early Internet - U: I'm going to type an L! Did you get an L? S: I got one-one-four. L! U:Did you get the O? S: One-one-seven. U: <types G> S: The computer just crashed.
     
bighead
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Orange County, California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2002, 09:54 PM
 
One of the many beauties of OS X is its open-source foundations. What does this mean? Research things and write your own driver. Apple provides developer tools for free, so get out and start writing. If it works well, you can even release it as shareware and make some money off of it.
the bighead

- MacBook Pro 15" matte non-unibody 2.6 GHz, 4GB RAM, 120/SSD & 750GB/7200
- PM G4 Dual 1.25 GHz, 2 GB RAM, 1x320 boot, 1x2TB TM Backup - 2x1TB & 2x3TB Archive/Backup
     
raphaelf
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 14, 2002, 12:45 AM
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by mugwump:

DVD playback does not exist for these machines in OS X. They actually tried to justify this by saying that the processor (G3 400) could not provide adequate playback in OS X. A blatant lie.

Is this really that important? If it is, you can always use OS 9.

--quicktime is not supported with this machine, becase they refuse to release the drivers for the graphics card. A slow OS sells more machines, they reason.

That's funny, I didn't run into any problems with Quicktime using OS 10.0.4+ on a Wallstreet 266 with 192MB RAM.

--No infared support for these machines. Again, they need to get users to buy new powerbooks.

I don't know anyone who actually uses IR. Have you tried bluetooth?

There aren't MANY powerbook owners who would spend another $3000 to go from a G3 400 lombard to a weak and slow g4 667. Sure it would be an improvment, but MOST owners will not budge, no matter how the coporation tries to dream up greater sales.


If I had a lombard I wouldn't upgrade to a Tibook, either, especially if it were my own money. Then again, IR and DVD aren't exactly make-or-break technologies for me. You can always use OS 9.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:23 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,