|
|
Yes, you can judge a book by its cover: My simple theory
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have recently thought of a theory, that when tested, has held up in anecdotally testing.
I define a "good book" as a book which adds to the collective knowledge of human civilization by evoking discussion and or scholarship and thus carves a path for future derivative works. This applies to all works from popular fiction to specialized academic scholarship.
A good book will emphasize the title over the author.
A bad book will emphasize the author over the title.
Here are two examples:
Bad book:
Some good books:
Next time you're in the book store or surfing Amazon, test it for yourself to see if my theory holds up. On my personal collection it has every single time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Failure:
I just ordered this:
So hopefully it's wrong there too…
EDIT: I like that they returned to the random-spaceship cover art theme from the first three Ender books.
(
Last edited by Chuckit; Jan 12, 2009 at 05:29 PM.
)
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
The best way to judge a book is by how many ass kicking movies it's been turned into.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
name size means fame. what will sell? name or title?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Sto Dgo, DR
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
name size means fame. what will sell? name or title?
I think that depend. If the story is good and well-known then the title will sell, now if it's something new from a known author then the name will sell. I've always judged a book from how creative the author made the title according to the story that has been written (from what the "summary" on the back of the book says). That always work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just because a book is written by and marketed heavily as being written by a prominent author does not make it bad. Likewise, just because the author is someone you've never heard of does not make it a good book.
I say the old phrase will always apply. Don't take it away from me, otherwise I'm going to have to find another tired old phrase.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Failure (theory)! Book (awesome)! :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does anyone disagree with my definition of a good book? Because the two examples above are definitely not good books.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I disagree with you OPINION of what makes a "good book".
In my OPINION, the book I posted is one of the best.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Going by your weird (my opinion) "definition" of a "good book", I guess this would prove your "theory":
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Whoa -- a new Ender book?!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Fail:
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Even more worse fail:
|
"It's weird the way 'finger puppets' sounds ok as a noun..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by cjrivera
Even more worse fail:
No, that seems to follow his rule. I mean, the title and author are the same size, but the author is at least at the top.
Unless you mean you think that is a good book?
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Author over title.
I think the 2 lines of author is still bigger than the 1 line title.
Plus, it's scientology, so extra fail points.
|
"It's weird the way 'finger puppets' sounds ok as a noun..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Smallish town in Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
My theory has held up in every single example presented in this thread. Just because something is a trashy pop fiction "bestseller" doesn't mean that it "adds to the collective knowledge of human civilization by evoking discussion and or scholarship and thus carves a path for future derivative works." (Macintologist 2009)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by macintologist
My theory has held up in every single example presented in this thread. Just because something is a trashy pop fiction "bestseller" doesn't mean that it "adds to the collective knowledge of human civilization by evoking discussion and or scholarship and thus carves a path for future derivative works." (Macintologist 2009)
And my example? It emphasizes the title over the author, but is not "good."
|
"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The New Posts Button
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Railroader
Going by your weird (my opinion) "definition" of a "good book", I guess this would prove your "theory":
Your post needs more "quotes".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Automatic
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
How about these ones?
(
Last edited by Chongo; Jan 13, 2009 at 12:50 PM.
)
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, Chongo pretty much shut down your theory right there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakar V
"Your" "post" "needs" "more" "quotes".
I was trying to use words incorrectly like he did. But I wanted to quote him so people didn't think I didn't know the correct usage.
Is that understandable?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|