|
|
$999 transition machine specs?
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Highland Park, IL / Santa Monica, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone know the full specs of Apple's $999 Intel machine?
|
Be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
WTF are you talking about? Come back in a year.
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Only that you have to return it to Apple end of 2006.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
He means the developer machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Randman
WTF are you talking about? Come back in a year.
He is talking about the Developer machine
Should have paid attention !
-t
edit: well, should have refreshed the thread before posting...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm guessing a 3.6GHz P4.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Winnipeg
Status:
Offline
|
|
You have to return it? Why the heck would they expect you to return it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Highland Park, IL / Santa Monica, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
We know it has a 3.64 GHz Pentium 4, but we don't know anything else -- RAM, GPU, dual-core or not, HD, PCI Express (could have it!), etc.
|
Be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Superchicken
You have to return it? Why the heck would they expect you to return it?
Because they don't want a version of OS X running around that could be installed on Dell/HP computers. I'm sure Apple isn't going to freak out about it, but at the same time, you are violating the software agreement if you do anything with it after you have agreed to return it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well that's lame-o. Why can't we just keep the box? What are they going to do with the hardware, refurbish it? Doesn't sound like its worth my $1000.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kuna, ID USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
These boxes are, in a weird sorta way, like the G5s MS is issuing for the Xbox 360.
No where near final design, workable for development.
You bet Apple with Intel boxes will utilize at least a proprietary chipset and will not in anyway be like the current Wintel boxes.
Don't count on the socket even being compatible.
T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Washington
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, DUH. It's for DEVELOPERS. Not end users, ya dummy. $1000 business expense is nothing for a biggish software developer.
|
Donate your spare cycles - join TeamNN today!
Remember to check the Marketplace!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Ghoser777
Well that's lame-o. Why can't we just keep the box? What are they going to do with the hardware, refurbish it? Doesn't sound like its worth my $1000.
Good thing you aren't a developer!
This is for the people that make their livleyhood writing code. Any smaller shop should be able to spend $1000. I'm sure there is also an educational edition out there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
My guess: 3.6Ghz, 512 RAM, 250GB SATA, ATI 9600.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Yamanashi, Japan
Status:
Offline
|
|
It would be interesting to know the specs. Though I'm very interested to see whats going to happen with the mini this summer. I can already imagine a TiVo like mini for home entertainment. It appears if Apple is trying real hard to take over the consumer entertainment sector.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mitchell_pgh
Good thing you aren't a developer!
This is for the people that make their livleyhood writing code. Any smaller shop should be able to spend $1000. I'm sure there is also an educational edition out there.
I am a developer... but I don't do it for my livelihood, so this investment won't be worth it, especially because I get to pay $999 to rent a machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Ghoser777
Well that's lame-o. Why can't we just keep the box? What are they going to do with the hardware, refurbish it? Doesn't sound like its worth my $1000.
I'm guessing you've never done demos like this before. Where I work we get this all the time, a vendor sends us a product we write our code against it and when we're done we sent the device back. Most of the time the product is worth thousands of dollars, but it's never a big deal. If you don't send the device back within a specified time limit they'll bill you and call it end of story. Since companies don't want to be saddled with hardware they no longer have a use for it gets sent back without a problem.
I'm guessing for Apple the $999 is a barrier to entry. They want to price it so everyone and their brother won't buy one hoping they'll get the latest and greatest. Since you have to return it the box only makes sense from a business perspective.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 'developer machine' is a virtual clone of one of the new ASUS retail motherboards. I can't say which one. It utilizes darn near all the latest chipset features - along with an Apple proprietary boot ROM. Windows (and other OSes) will, in fact, run on the platform - but the MacOS will not run on any x86 platform without the proprietary boot ROM.
you're welcome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spliffdaddy
The 'developer machine' is a virtual clone of one of the new ASUS retail motherboards. I can't say which one. It utilizes darn near all the latest chipset features - along with an Apple proprietary boot ROM. Windows (and other OSes) will, in fact, run on the platform - but the MacOS will not run on any x86 platform without the proprietary boot ROM.
you're welcome.
You can install Windows out-of-the-box onto it?! I thought Windows needed BIOS, or is BIOS only for booting the hardware?
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Hyrule
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Intel Mac board does use BIOS, it does not use Openfirmware.
|
Aloha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
If this just runs on ANY PC, then it WILL BE leaked, and PC users will know what it feels like to use OS X first hand.
And wont be able to look back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
BIOS (binary input/output system) stores information about the motherboard hardware - like a mini OS. The state of the motherboard hardware features can be accessed/changed by the 'real' OS. After booting, there is no need for the BIOS.
The Apple proprietary boot ROM is an additional 'layer' that translates the BIOS information for the Mac OS. Many manufacturers include a 'boot ROM' - Compaq, for one. Usually, it's provided for feature setup and troubleshooting etc. outside of the OS - in case the OS won't boot properly.
The Mac OS requires the Mac boot ROM in order to boot - a standard BIOS isn't enough.
The Mac's boot ROM is proprietary - and cannot be legally duplicated. Which is to say, it CAN be copied - but cannot be distributed, sold, etc. I'm betting that Apple chooses to incorporate a unique identifying number into each boot ROM - linking it to the already-present unique identifying number included in every Intel CPU. In other words, every Mac will need to have the same CPU that shipped with the motherboard's boot ROM - else the Mac OS cannot be loaded.
(
Last edited by Spliffdaddy; Jun 6, 2005 at 08:43 PM.
Reason: additional info)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone have the OS X Intel torrent?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
The only thing that will change for Mac users is their ability to use the newest, best hardware - at the same time as peecee users.
Immediate hardware availability - assuming Apple can release drivers for it. Which they should be able to do.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
So is this a $999 deposit or $999 rental? Just curious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 1999
Location: Bellevue, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
You need to be an existing ADC member (not Online or Student) too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Aiken, South Carolina, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Apple II GS | Powerbook 165 | iMac Rev. A 96mb RAM| iBook G3 500mhz, 128mb RAM | Power Macintosh G5 1.6ghz, 2.25gb RAM | Black MacBook 2ghz, 2gb RAM | iPhone Rev. A 8gb HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Aiken, South Carolina, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Apple II GS | Powerbook 165 | iMac Rev. A 96mb RAM| iBook G3 500mhz, 128mb RAM | Power Macintosh G5 1.6ghz, 2.25gb RAM | Black MacBook 2ghz, 2gb RAM | iPhone Rev. A 8gb HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wonder if the developer system will ship in a G5-style case...?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cadaver
Wonder if the developer system will ship in a G5-style case...?
TheSteve said it was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Zimphire
If this just runs on ANY PC, then it WILL BE leaked, and PC users will know what it feels like to use OS X first hand.
And wont be able to look back.
Yes, but Apple makes most of it's money off hardware (Apple's weak side) and uses it's OS (Apple's strong side) to sell that hardware. The only result of a leaked MacOS that can run on any PC will be a bunch of Dell's running a pirated version of MacOS ... lose-lose for Apple.
My interest will be in a laptop that can dual boot into both MacOS and Windows
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio :(
Status:
Offline
|
|
So besides tying the boot rom identifier to the CPU identifier, i just wait till the boot rom is leaked, buy a supported board, and i could build my own apple with "supported hardware"? hmmmm
|
(Powermac) 2x 2.0Ghz / 2560MB DDR400 / Radeon x800xt / 2x 36GB Raptors (Raid 0)
20" Apple Cinema Display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kuna, ID USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cadaver
Wonder if the developer system will ship in a G5-style case...?
You'd think for a monumental move like this it would be a redesign. The G5 (sic) will be ready for one by then anyway.
T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
Yes, but Apple makes most of it's money off hardware (Apple's weak side) and uses it's OS (Apple's strong side) to sell that hardware. The only result of a leaked MacOS that can run on any PC will be a bunch of Dell's running a pirated version of MacOS ... lose-lose for Apple.
My interest will be in a laptop that can dual boot into both MacOS and Windows
Screw dual boot... on Intel you will be able to boot OS X and run something like Vmware. Because you are native hardware for Windows, it's going to run WAY WAY WAY faster than Virtual PC. I am looking forward to my dual core PowerBook with 4GB of RAM running OS X, Windows, and Fedora all at the same time. I can do that now of course, but it's so slow that real work is a pain in the ass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by liquidtrance123
So besides tying the boot rom identifier to the CPU identifier, i just wait till the boot rom is leaked, buy a supported board, and i could build my own apple with "supported hardware"? hmmmm
It will not just be the boot rom. Apple will NEVER use off-the-shelf, "ready-made" motherboards. They will design their own, with plenty of custom chips. In order to run OS X for Intel on an off-the-shelf motherboard, not only will you have to get the boot ROMs, but you will also have to write drivers for the motherboards, etc... or emulate Apple Hardware like Pear PC does now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Tupelo, MS
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by chrisutley
Screw dual boot... on Intel you will be able to boot OS X and run something like Vmware. Because you are native hardware for Windows, it's going to run WAY WAY WAY faster than Virtual PC. I am looking forward to my dual core PowerBook with 4GB of RAM running OS X, Windows, and Fedora all at the same time. I can do that now of course, but it's so slow that real work is a pain in the ass.
Aren't they moving back to 32 bit chips with the move to intel? If so, doesn't that put the RAM limit back to 2GB like we were with the G4? Is there a 64 bit version of the P4 out there? I think AMD has a 64 bit chip, but I'm not familiar with an intel version. Maybe that is in the pipeline and we'll see it with the 1st powermac. Maybe that is why we'll have to wait until 2007 to see the first intel chip in a powermac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by chrisutley
I am looking forward to my dual core PowerBook with 4GB of RAM running OS X, Windows, and Fedora all at the same time. I can do that now of course, but it's so slow that real work is a pain in the ass.
sounds fun!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Highland Park, IL / Santa Monica, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
So no one knows the specs? Does it not say on the page where you order it? I can't get there, since I'm not a select/premier ADC member...
|
Be happy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spliffdaddy
The 'developer machine' is a virtual clone of one of the new ASUS retail motherboards. I can't say which one. It utilizes darn near all the latest chipset features - along with an Apple proprietary boot ROM. Windows (and other OSes) will, in fact, run on the platform - but the MacOS will not run on any x86 platform without the proprietary boot ROM.
you're welcome.
give it a week after they hit the streets for that boot ROM to be cracked.
|
Blandine Bureau 1940 - 2011
Missed 2012 by 3 days, RIP Grandma :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm sure they'll put GPS tracking into these to make sure one doesn't escape them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Athens
give it a week after they hit the streets for that boot ROM to be cracked.
I truly believe this to be the case. Furthermore, Apple doesn't have a lot of experience from keeping people from doing things. It is new territory for them If they think they can combat the problem with their legal team, they are dead wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: 'round the corner
Status:
Offline
|
|
Who knows what will happen in a year. All you people here are speculating on things that have not been said.
All one can be sure of is that this does not mean Mac OS X on anything but Apple made hardware. Period
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by osxpinot
I truly believe this to be the case. Furthermore, Apple doesn't have a lot of experience from keeping people from doing things. It is new territory for them If they think they can combat the problem with their legal team, they are dead wrong.
Thats why if they where smart they would release a stand alone copy at 199.00 and sell to the general masses and make money off the OS, and for the hardware, bundle it with ilife, and some other great software to make the machine a great deal
|
Blandine Bureau 1940 - 2011
Missed 2012 by 3 days, RIP Grandma :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Athens
Thats why if they where smart they would release a stand alone copy at 199.00 and sell to the general masses and make money off the OS, and for the hardware, bundle it with ilife, and some other great software to make the machine a great deal
No, I don't think that would be smart. The people who are going to be installing OS X on hacked out machines are going to pirate the OS anyways. Let the stupid people that don't have a clue buy macs. Not to mention the driver support.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, just to add a historical perspective:
Mac OS X is a direct descendant of NeXTstep. In fact, one could accurately say that Mac OS X is simply a later version of NeXT.
Anyway, NeXTstep existed for Intel. But you couldn't just install it on any old PC. Aside from having system requirements that, for the time, were extremely high (16MB minimum RAM for grayscale display, 32MB to get color, back when most PCs had 2-4MB RAM), it had very limited driver support. If you wanted to run it, you had to pick components very carefully.
I similarly expect that whatever OS X ships on Apple's Intel machines will have no driver support for any parts Apple has not shipped. This will make running it on arbitrary PC hardware very non-trivial.
tooki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think people will care if they have to build a computer based on parts that are OS X compatible (What do they have to loose other than time?). It will be a non-issue for them as it is still cheaper than a Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Rhapsody is a pretty good example too. There were some compatibility problems there too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location: California - Bay Area
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by osxpinot
I don't think people will care if they have to build a computer based on parts that are OS X compatible (What do they have to lose other than time?). It will be a non-issue for them as it is still cheaper than a Mac
A sound and reasoned argument... derived from an assumption based upon a guess with its roots in the unknown.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|