Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > 6th Graders Have Sex in Classroom

6th Graders Have Sex in Classroom (Page 2)
Thread Tools
Rumor
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:04 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
You honestly think a 12-year-old is ready to handle the physical, emotional, and societal consequences of sex?
They are ready to handle the biological aspect of a sexual relationship, which covers physical. Children are way too sheltered, so no on the emotional. As for societal, you basically agreed with what Erik said.
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:14 PM
 
Girls and some boys may be biologically ready to engage in the act at that age, but that does not mean they are able to deal with the consequences thereafter. Some 12 year-olds still play with dolls and action figures.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:18 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Girls and some boys may be biologically ready to engage in the act at that age, but that does not mean they are able to deal with the consequences thereafter. Some 12 year-olds still play with dolls and action figures.
Some MacNNers still play with "dolls" and action figures.
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
You honestly think a 12-year-old is ready to handle the physical, emotional, and societal consequences of sex?
What Rumor said.

My opinion on whether a 12 year old is "ready" or not is irrelevant. Maturity, and especially emotional maturity, is highly individual. At 12, there would be a wide range of maturity-levels which had to be taken into consideration on a case by case basis.

The world is not black and white, and there is not a set age where you suddenly become mature enough to handle sex. Heck, there's thirty year olds which have maturity problems.

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:28 PM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
What Rumor said.

My opinion on whether a 12 year old is "ready" or not is irrelevant. Maturity, and especially emotional maturity, is highly individual. At 12, there would be a wide range of maturity-levels which had to be taken into consideration on a case by case basis.

The world is not black and white, and there is not a set age where you suddenly become mature enough to handle sex. Heck, there's thirty year olds which have maturity problems.
That's a poor comparison. While it is individual and some people never reach the level of maturity that's required, that doesn't entail that other people might just as easily reach that level of maturity the moment they're born.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
That's a poor comparison. While it is individual and some people never reach the level of maturity that's required, that doesn't entail that other people might just as easily reach that level of maturity the moment they're born.
That's not what I said. What a peculiar Kevin-like spin.


[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
The Godfather
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:35 PM
 
So, this is a disagreement of the could/should variety. I do believe that a pair of 12-y-o could get the hots for each other and do the horizontal mambo. But it should be strongly warned against because of the consequences that should be pretty obvious to everyone: risking pregnancy, birthgiving, parenting at age 13, losing your chance of finishing high school and going to college, etc.
I have to plead guilty of not knowing the emotional harm that comes from minor-to-minor sex. Anyone?
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 07:39 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Godfather View Post
I have to plead guilty of not knowing the emotional harm that comes from minor-to-minor sex. Anyone?
Same as with any emotional harms stemming from sex: guilt, regret, anxiety, etc. Again, this is highly individual, but I suspect minors could be more susceptible to these types of emotions with the added societal pressures.

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Salty
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 9, 2007, 10:23 PM
 
Sexual activity is commonly linked to a host of psychological disorders when practiced at a young age. Even if it's children molesting each other. Actually you'll find most research will suggest that early sexual contact before the child is capable of processing and handling all that they experience is one of the biggest causes of later psychological disorders, right there, and commonly associated with abuse from parents and other care givers.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 12:00 AM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
That's not what I said. What a peculiar Kevin-like spin.
If you weren't trying to suggest that there's a decent chance young children are ready for sex, what were you trying to say?
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 12:08 PM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
My opinion on whether a 12 year old is "ready" or not is irrelevant. Maturity, and especially emotional maturity, is highly individual. At 12, there would be a wide range of maturity-levels which had to be taken into consideration on a case by case basis.
All right then, let's look at statistics. About how many 12-year-olds, expressed as a percentage of a whole, would you say are truly ready?

If you really want to get to the age at which people are truly ready for this sort of thing, then my initial hypothesis would be an average of 25, with a standard deviation of about three years. In other words, if we assume a normal distribution then some 60% of people finally attain the maturity level needed to handle sexual relationships between the ages of 22 and 28.
The world is not black and white, and there is not a set age where you suddenly become mature enough to handle sex. Heck, there's thirty year olds which have maturity problems.
Then once again, let's look at it statistically. If we assume my model (the numbers for which are mostly ex recto at the moment but can easily be adapted to fit more scientific data), then about 96% of people finally become mature enough between the ages of 18 and 31, 99.97% between 15 and 34, and 99.993% between 12 and 37.

The odds of a given 12-year-old being mature enough to handle a sexual relationship, in other words, are about 1 in 33,000. If we assume that there are about 500,000 12-year-olds in the country, then we could expect to find maybe 15 who are mature enough for this sort of thing. Getting two of them into the same classroom would be, to put it mildly, quite difficult.

Perhaps you want to challenge my numbers. That's certainly feasible, though the basic model stands. Give me a range of ages during which you'd say 60% of people -not much more than half- finally become mature enough to handle the physical, emotional, and societal implications of sex, taking both the act itself and the possible consequences into account. Then we'll run the numbers.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 12:13 PM
 
Originally Posted by The Godfather View Post
I have to plead guilty of not knowing the emotional harm that comes from minor-to-minor sex. Anyone?
The basic effects are the same as could come from sex between any two people: issues with attachment, with power dynamics, with morality (personal or external; it can often happen either way), and so forth. The difference comes from the fact that minors are not equipped to deal with these things: they lack the experience and education, not just in sexual matters but also in life in general. Without that, the effects are magnified, sometimes greatly.

Sex is not a meaningless form of play, worth no more than the nerve endings it stimulates. Somewhere along the line our society lost sight of that. This mistake needs to be corrected.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 12:45 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
The basic effects are the same as could come from sex between any two people: issues with attachment, with power dynamics, with morality (personal or external; it can often happen either way), and so forth. The difference comes from the fact that minors are not equipped to deal with these things: they lack the experience and education, not just in sexual matters but also in life in general. Without that, the effects are magnified, sometimes greatly.

Sex is not a meaningless form of play, worth no more than the nerve endings it stimulates. Somewhere along the line our society lost sight of that. This mistake needs to be corrected.
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 12:59 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
Sex is not a meaningless form of play, worth no more than the nerve endings it stimulates. Somewhere along the line our society lost sight of that. This mistake needs to be corrected.
Quoted again just because the truth should be repeated over and over.
     
marden  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 01:01 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader View Post
Quoted again just because the truth should be repeated over and over.
I agree.

Originally Posted by Millennium
Sex is not a meaningless form of play, worth no more than the nerve endings it stimulates. Somewhere along the line our society lost sight of that. This mistake needs to be corrected.
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 04:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
All right then, let's look at statistics. About how many 12-year-olds, expressed as a percentage of a whole, would you say are truly ready?
Statistically, a very small one. Since you'd use the qualifier truly, I'd even be more conservative than you and say >1%. And again, that's not up to me, but to the individuals involved.

And to answer Chuckit's question in the same go: I am not trying to say any of the such, just putting the biological facts out there. If kids are fooling around and discover sex it's because their urges are in place and working. That's just nature.

I'd rather not touch the moral, sociological and psychological aspects of it myself.

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 04:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium View Post
The basic effects are the same as could come from sex between any two people: issues with attachment, with power dynamics, with morality (personal or external; it can often happen either way), and so forth. The difference comes from the fact that minors are not equipped to deal with these things: they lack the experience and education, not just in sexual matters but also in life in general. Without that, the effects are magnified, sometimes greatly.

Sex is not a meaningless form of play, worth no more than the nerve endings it stimulates. Somewhere along the line our society lost sight of that. This mistake needs to be corrected.
Looks like we are saying the same thing here.

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 04:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
And to answer Chuckit's question in the same go: I am not trying to say any of the such, just putting the biological facts out there. If kids are fooling around and discover sex it's because their urges are in place and working. That's just nature.
Oh. Well, that's true, but kind of irrelevant.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 04:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
Oh. Well, that's true, but kind of irrelevant.
Irrelevant to what?

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 05:45 PM
 
To the situation at hand. The statement, "If two people decide to have sex, their sex drives must be working" is tautologically true, but I don't see how that fact sheds any light on anything.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Northeastern292
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Brushton, New York (middle of nowhere)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 05:59 PM
 
Originally Posted by Railroader View Post
Some MacNNers still play with "dolls" and action figures.
Some 16-year olds still play with Matchbox cars.
The Mac Collection:

Power Mac G4 Sawtooth at 450MHz, Power Mac G4 Gigabit Ethernet at 400MHz, three Power Mac FW800's at 1.0GHz, MacBook Pro at 2.0GHz, my late father's G3 iMac at 350MHz, an iMac at 500MHz, a PowerBook G4 (12-inch VGA) and a PowerBook 170
     
Railroader
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 06:57 PM
 
Originally Posted by Northeastern292 View Post
Some 16-year olds still play with Matchbox cars.
What's your point?

You are a mystery wrapped up in an enigma. And not in a good way.
     
Adam Betts
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 10, 2007, 08:20 PM
 
Originally Posted by Northeastern292 View Post
Some 16-year olds still play with Matchbox cars.
They're practicing to get their driver's license duh
     
 
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:29 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,