|
|
Adobe framed?
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Where the streets have no names...
Status:
Offline
|
|
What is Adobe "Full Frame" going to be? Guesses?
More...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Something to do with video, would be my guess.
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Where the streets have no names...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Randman
Something to do with video, would be my guess.
That's the first thing that came to my mind as well. But they already have the "Video collection"...hmmm
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Agreed: probably their Avid/FCP competitor. I don't think it will go anywhere.
And what's with the Photoshop and Photoshop Premium? Remember when Adobe was about making good software?
|
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Earlier today, I came from the Macromedia launch of Studio 8 and video is a big part of it. And lots of the apps have already been Adobe-ized, with the menu palettes, not that that part is a bad thing.
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Something for Windows only?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Where the streets have no names...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Don Pickett
And what's with the Photoshop and Photoshop Premium?
I find this trend very disconcerting as well. I don't think it offers the user any possibilities to "optimize" their investments. It's just a way of jacking up the price for a "Premium" version.
Lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
If it's got Acrobat for Tiger, I'll buy it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Perhaps it is a renamed Photoshop elements or they sell Bride with some touchup abilities in it.
|
"That's okay, I'd like to keep it on manual control for a while."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Maybe it'll let you make picture frames?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
It has special tools for doctoring up crime scene photographs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Replacement for Premiere?
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Landlockinated
Status:
Offline
|
|
Seems a bit early for CS3. And the two versions thing is just going back to the days of Photoshop CE. Except they already have a consumer edition, it's called Elements. They are just going to confuse the market.
Full Frame sounds like a video app. Perhaps Premier + After Effects?
As far as Apple Photo Pro, even though the description in the article indicates "iPhoto on steroids" that isn't what FCP to iMovie. But it seems like an insane move to try to compete with Pshop. Unless Apple thinks the market is pissed at Adobe or something.
|
[ sig removed - image host changed it to a big ad picture ]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
All I can say is that I hope if Apple goes out of their way to Piss off Adobe they do it right and really piss em off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
All I can say is that I hope if Apple goes out of their way to Piss off Adobe they do it right and really piss em off
I absolutely hope that they don't piss off Adobe.
|
iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Goldfinger
I absolutely hope that they don't piss off Adobe.
Well if Apple decides to compete with Adobe with Photoshop they're going to be pissed either way. So at least Apple could make sure to really piss Adobe off with an amazing product.
That said it's a catch 22. Office you can kind piss off M$ and you're OK because the features most people use with Office aren't insanely complicated. I don't think even Apple could provide a solution to compete with Adobe's creative suite before them dropping the platform would seriously hurt Apple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think Apple will pull out a "Photoshop" unless Adobe pulls Photoshop for the Mac, or they do something really bad to make Steve mad.
Apple needs a Office replacement before it needs a Photoshop replacement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
maybe it's a widescreen type video editor for movies, not just TV??? Jes guessin'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
I don't think Apple will pull out a "Photoshop" unless Adobe pulls Photoshop for the Mac, or they do something really bad to make Steve mad.
Apple needs a Office replacement before it needs a Photoshop replacement.
Yah, and pissing off just about every ISV other than Delicious Monster is probably not a great idea.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple has created more opportunities for ISV than they've destroyed. If you don't want Apple to "steal" your idea, don't do obvious things, implement them half-way and then charge too much for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by DeathMan
Apple has created more opportunities for ISV than they've destroyed. If you don't want Apple to "steal" your idea, don't do obvious things, implement them half-way and then charge too much for them.
Agreed, it's just funny how a lot of people myself included fall into the trap of wanting Apple to make everything. Granted word processing and presentation software, e-mail software, web browsers, and IM clients aren't exactly areas where too many people want in. Things like Video editing software, and photo editing are areas where Apple didn't NEED to go. Though with Final Cut Pro Apple wanted to take on the video market and did it well.
Though I will say that a lot of ISVs haven't had great experienecs with Apple. Take note, of all the apps in my dock... about half are made by Apple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Antediluvia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
New Framemaker?
In our dreams
|
"In darkness there is strength, therefore strength is darkness."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Capitol City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Salty
Things like Video editing software, and photo editing are areas where Apple didn't NEED to go.
You're wrong about that. Apple didn't want to lose the DV market it helped create because Adobe couldn't keep Premiere stable on the mac, so they did what they had to do. Its the same thing they did with Safari. They wanted to make sure people were having a Mac-like experience on their macs.
Why did they develop Motion? Why did they develop Shake? Because these things were not taking advantage of what the mac has to offer, rather choosing to provide a sort of feature parity (imparedy) and you end up with what you said in the other post about MM apps. Bad windows ports.
Apple has had to step up to ensure that the Mac experience stays unique. IE? crap. Premiere? Crap. After Effects? Okay, but falling way behind on the mac side. iChat? I didn't see anyone doing voice or video over chat back then. especially not on the Mac.
Apple had to create these apps, because they had to make sure there is a differentiation in the market place. Ironically, Microsoft is one of the few large software companies that seem to at least try to make their Mac apps more mac-like than the PC counterparts. Maybe they're not doing a good enough job, but it shows that they at least see that there is a higher standard. But yeah, Powerpoint pretty much sucks. IE was good, until it just got so crashy you just couldn't use it.
Okay I'll stop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
IE wasn't very mac like. The GUI was not standard.. didn't even use the same theme.
That was lame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
High Definition video editing would be my guess.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Vente: Achat
Status:
Offline
|
|
People, people...
Adobe is obviously putting out a new html editor- and frames, yes <frameset>s, will be its signature feature. Frames everywhere! Viva 1998!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|