Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Desktops > Yet another video card question

Yet another video card question
Thread Tools
Doofy
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 23, 2010, 11:26 PM
 
2008 MP, standard cheapo card installed. 10.5

Thinking of popping some horsepower in there for a bit of flight sim action on both Mac and an XP partition.

Notions:
1) Don't want to go 10.6 as this will degrade stability of some Mac apps in use on machine.
2) Don't want to do any messing - just buy card, slot in and go.

Nvidia GTX 285 Mac Edition make sense?
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
     
Waragainstsleep
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 04:42 AM
 
What apps are unstable under 10.6?
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 06:18 AM
 
That is a very expensive (and hot) card for "some flight sim action". I'd take a look at a used 8800 GT or something. That model used to come with an 8800GT as an option, so there should be enough cards of that type around. I don't know about exact prices, but hopefully the launch of the 5770 upgrade cut resale prices a bit. A 4870 is also an option which supports 10.5.x, which should be available for less than a GTX 285.
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 10:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep View Post
What apps are unstable under 10.6?
A lot of music apps and sound card drivers are very finicky as to what OS they're running on.

Originally Posted by P View Post
That is a very expensive (and hot) card for "some flight sim action". I'd take a look at a used 8800 GT or something. That model used to come with an 8800GT as an option, so there should be enough cards of that type around. I don't know about exact prices, but hopefully the launch of the 5770 upgrade cut resale prices a bit. A 4870 is also an option which supports 10.5.x, which should be available for less than a GTX 285.
I'm not keen on used, so I've had a look around and my options are:

1) 1 Gb GTX 285 @ 3 weeks wait @ £400 ish.
2) 512 Mb HD 4870 @ no wait @ £275 ish.

So a £125 difference. Is the GTX worth £125 more?
     
Don Pickett
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 12:36 PM
 
Keep in mind that nVidia's OS X drivers are awful. With X-Plane--speaking of flight sim action--an ATi card will get you up to three times the frame rate of a comparable nVidia card.
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 01:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
I'm not keen on used, so I've had a look around and my options are:

1) 1 Gb GTX 285 @ 3 weeks wait @ £400 ish.
2) 512 Mb HD 4870 @ no wait @ £275 ish.

So a £125 difference. Is the GTX worth £125 more?
For "some flight sim action"? No. Lists like these are always useful. The GTX 285 is bin number 4 from the top (beaten only by dual chip solutions and the top cards from the next generation - the GTX 480 and the 5870). The 4870 is number 5. It is still, today, a very very powerful card- you're fine in almost any game up to 1920*1080 res at least. For comparison, your current card is bin 16 from the top.
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 02:19 PM
 
Originally Posted by Don Pickett View Post
Keep in mind that nVidia's OS X drivers are awful. With X-Plane--speaking of flight sim action--an ATi card will get you up to three times the frame rate of a comparable nVidia card.
Right, that swings it then.

On further research, seems like FSX isn't all that dependant on outright GPU capability anyway, as it's very CPU bound.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 03:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by P View Post
That is a very expensive (and hot) card for "some flight sim action".
Originally Posted by P View Post
For "some flight sim action"?
Let me clarify "flight sim action".
I won't be gaming - I'll be using it to simulate flying in order to ascertain whether I'm up to the job and confident enough to go for a PPL. X-plane for the physics, FSX for the G1000 familiarity.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 03:04 PM
 
Thanks chaps!
     
Don Pickett
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: New York, NY, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 24, 2010, 05:48 PM
 
Originally Posted by Doofy View Post
Right, that swings it then.

On further research, seems like FSX isn't all that dependant on outright GPU capability anyway, as it's very CPU bound.
All flight sims are CPU bound, but you need a good video card to handle texture data, 3D data for planes and eye candy. X-Plane making better and better use of multiple cores, but a good GPU helps.
The era of anthropomorphizing hardware is over.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 29, 2010, 04:47 AM
 
OK, took a look at what's doing what on the old graphics card. Seems like the card is slowing things down, since XP9 is only pegging about 30% on a single core. Running maybe 25fps until I bump the number of objects up, then it hits 19fps and fogs everything more than a mile away.

4870 due to be delivered today, so we'll see what happens.
     
Doofy  (op)
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 30, 2010, 05:23 PM
 
4870 installed. Slightly better than the default card. Turned the anti-aliasing up to 2x, bumped the textures up to max. About 40 fps. Clouds look nice.
It'll do for now. Thanks chaps.
     
MM-o4
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Sep 30, 2010, 09:59 PM
 
Hey,

had my 7300 go in my Mac Pro. Apple wanted $860 AUS to replace. Picked up a flashed firmware 8800 GT from eBay for $180 AUS. Works great so I'm super happy

Works great in windows 7 also.

My 2 cents
     
Waragainstsleep
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 1, 2010, 07:21 AM
 
Check your 7300 for bulging caps. Apple should cover it OOW if it has them.
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:42 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,