 |
 |
Discribe vs. Toast
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Bensalem, PA
Status:
Offline
|
|
What are the preferences among MacNN readers? I've only had a chance to test both and am trying to make an informed buying decision.
|
|
Andy Pastuszak
amp68(spammenot)-at-verizon.net
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Toast for sure. Easy to use, works, no problems with it. Haven't used Discribe though, so I can only offer insight into Toast. If I had to pick either, I would go Toast.
Cipher13
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Toast seems to be updated more regularly than Discribe has, and although discribe has a pretty interface, I believe Toast offers more functionality. Adaptec also offers the Jam program for those into audio and it's really the only choice short of Masterlist (and you have to have a ProTools system to have that work for you).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Oberlin, OH, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Macworld, my brother, and I all hate Discribe. The tech support is really bad, too. Go with toast.
------------------
Simon Kornblith
Computer Consultant
Programmer
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top