Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Art & Graphic Design > Time for a new hardware calibration tool

Time for a new hardware calibration tool
Thread Tools
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2013, 11:41 AM
 
I have my ColorSpyder 2 in storage across the globe and since the software is PowerPC, and a software update costs close to the same that a new cheap hardware calibration tool costs, I've decided to get a new one. Now, about 5 years ago, the forum has suggested a few solutions, but most of these are no longer on the market.

So what are the best hardware calibration solutions on the market? The new ColorSpyder 4 Pro/Elite seems interesting since apparently I can calibrate different corners of the screen separately. But other than that, the breadth of choice is a bit confusing and things like reliability are difficult to measure. What do you use?
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
andi*pandi
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2013, 12:25 PM
 
Unfortunately, we seem to have abandoned calibrating. :/
     
Thorzdad
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2013, 02:05 PM
 
Since I can't afford a hardware solution, I've been relying on software tools like SuperCal. You can get a pretty acceptable result with it, if you take your time.
     
The Final Dakar
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2013, 02:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by andi*pandi View Post
Unfortunately, we seem to have abandoned calibrating. :/
Yep, not happened here in at least 5 years.

Edit: Moderator c-c-c-combo breaker!
     
OreoCookie  (op)
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 7, 2013, 10:06 PM
 
Really? At least to me, it made a world of difference back then, especially with skin tones. Back in the thread, Veltiner strongly recommended the X-Rite Eye-One Display 2, but that was a few years ago.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Thorzdad
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 8, 2013, 08:53 AM
 
Calibration is still critical for anyone working professionally, especially if they're doing any print work. The web is a crap-shoot color-wise, of course, since you don't have any control over the viewer's monitor. But, imho, it's still important that everything is correct on your end, as a reference point.

I ran into this problem at my last job where I'd put something together for either print or web, and have to send it around to executives for approval. Of course, they're looking at things on their cheap-ass uncalibrated monitors, with the brightness cranked to 11 and colors set to Oompa Loompa. It was literally a weekly tradition that I had to explain to one suit or the other all about color management and why, despite what she looks like on his screensaver, Ariel Rebel isn't really bright orange.
     
andi*pandi
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 8, 2013, 09:46 AM
 
I think the print team makes do with maintaining the same calibration/prepress settings with our prepress team (and thus are really slow to update software or anything that could require changing it, thinking about changing it, etc.

The web team just tries to aim for using the same settings... unless we have to work on something from the outside, or with the print department... so yeah, one of my pet peeves is not being consistent in the settings. CS6 also seems to do things a little differently.

We use a lot of light subtle tints in our designs. I really hate having to check color "on the PC" because I know there are 40 billion different monitors/PCs out there and it will not look the same everywhere. The tints fade to nothing on my crappy Dell monitor. As an added plus, we show our work on projectors in conference rooms where the color is incredibly blown out/wrong. We have to bring a MacBook in with us so the clients can really see what it looks like.

<grumble>
     
Thorzdad
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 8, 2013, 09:56 AM
 
Good lord, andi...Don't they ever re-compensate their monitors individually? Everyone using the same general settings is great, but even LCD screens will vary greatly and change over time.
     
OreoCookie  (op)
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 13, 2013, 04:08 AM
 
It's really surprising to me that the attitude towards calibration has changed that dramatically. A cheap hardware calibration tool costs not even $100, a tiny investment if you have several computers and it'll work for several years.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 02:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
Really? At least to me, it made a world of difference back then, especially with skin tones. Back in the thread, Veltiner strongly recommended the X-Rite Eye-One Display 2, but that was a few years ago.
I can recommend that too, but it costs about a grand.
     
reader50
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 02:53 PM
 
I still use my ColorSpyder2 since I'm still on my G5. Anyone with dual (or higher) monitors needs to calibrate. Or the color change when windows are dragged between monitors will bug me.
     
OreoCookie  (op)
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 08:51 PM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
I can recommend that too, but it costs about a grand.
That's a bit steep, I was thinking of staying below $250 or so.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
reader50
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 5, 2013, 09:15 PM
 
Regarding the Spyder2, Datacolor has modified a version of their sypder3 software so it handles Spyder2express on OS X 10.7 and above.

Datacolor OSX Lion Support - Datacolor Imaging Solutions
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:19 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,