Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Apple shareholder suit accuses Cook, Jobs, others of misconduct

Apple shareholder suit accuses Cook, Jobs, others of misconduct
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 10:05 AM
 
A new lawsuit, filed on behalf of plaintiff R. Andre Klein, is seeking damage compensation for Apple shareholders as a result of alleged misconduct by the company's directors and executives. Lawyers for Klein accuse former CEO Steve Jobs, current CEO Tim Cook and others of "breach of fiduciary duty, gross mismanagement, corporate waste, and breach of the duty of honest services." Specifically, by engaging in anti-poaching practices, Apple leaders are said to have caused the company to break antitrust laws, issue misleading proxy statements, and suppress workers' wages.

It's also said to have wasted significant amounts of money due to "years of lost opportunities to hire more qualified employees that were employed at other companies; costs incurred from defending and paying a settlement in the class action for violation of antitrust laws; costs incurred from defending and settling allegations by the Department of Justice; and loss of reputation."

The complaint is founded largely on a separate and as-yet-unsettled class action lawsuit against Apple, Adobe, Google, and Intel over anti-poaching agreements. The companies are believed to be at the center of a conspiracy in which they and other technology firms agreed not to hire from each other. This may have allowed the involved parties to avoid competing in salaries and benefits to lure and retain talent.

Klein's attorneys point to a particularly damning series of discoveries in that case which put Jobs at the center of the conspiracy. A series of emails shows that in 2005, Jobs made "irate" phone calls to Google co-founder Sergey Brin, complaining about Google trying to recruit members of Apple's Safari team. By February 26th the two companies had forged a pact not to hire from each other; from there anti-poaching agreements extended to many other businesses, including Comcast, Microsoft, Oracle, and IBM. A surfaced affidavit suggests that Jobs may have even threatened Palm with a patent suit if it hired an Apple worker; former Palm CEO Edward Colligan is said to have described Jobs' anti-poaching rules as "likely illegal."

Aside from Jobs and Cook, other defendants named in the suit include former board chairman William Campbell, former CFO Fred Anderson, and board members Mickey Drexler, Art Levinson, Robert Iger, and Andrea Jung. Another 30 anonymous defendants are cited, but their identities will only be investigated if the case moves into discovery.
     
pairof9s
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 10:28 AM
 
And good luck in showing how that severely harmed your investment...I mean knowing this information even now, are you NOT going to buy Apple stock?
     
aviamquepasa
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 11:18 AM
 
Considering that since 2005, Apple's stock has multiplied by 10, I don't see the point.
     
sunman42
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 01:46 PM
 
I don't even play a lawyer on TV, but in order for a suit to proceed, the complainant has to be able to prove standing; that is, some way in which they, personally, were harmed (usually financially) by the actions of the defendants. How can anyone prove they were harmed by these actions? The burden of proof is on the complainant in such cases. I'm willing to bet this is dismissed before it gets to trial.
     
James Katt
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 03:40 PM
 
Apple has become the world's largest and most profitable non-oil company.
By no measure was any harm done to stock holders - like me - who look at lawsuits like this as truly harmful to Apple since Apple is forced to waste time and resources defending itself against these parasite lawyers. It is up to judges to give these lawyers the death penalty. Sanctions are simply not enough.
     
Charles Martin
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 06:19 PM
 
Call me old-fashioned, but wouldn't you at least have to prove the accusations of the criminal case so that you have any evidence of the primary charge first? This shareholder reminds me of the Department of Justice: sue first ask questions ... well ... never.
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
     
ryanjo
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Lake Mary, Florida
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 15, 2014, 07:09 PM
 
Nuisance lawsuit. Apple will pay something to make it go away. Less expensive than defending it, even if you win. Just another way for trolls to make money in our corrupt legal system.
     
ctt61
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Aug 16, 2014, 11:36 AM
 
They should change the law, so that if plaintiff lose the case, his or her law firm have to pay all the cost of both sides. this is the only way that these type of lawsuits will stop. only the legitimate case can proceed.
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:19 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,