|
|
Large variance of speed in addressing network nodes
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Airport based network in a domestic situation composed of
Airport Extreme base station type n with attached USB powered 500 gig Seagate drive and a ADSL modem
1 Tb Timecapsule dual band
Airport Express type n
220.3 Mb file copied from MBP to Seagate took about 2 mins.
Straight after the same file has taken 15 minutes to copy from MBP to the Timecapsule
Why should this be?
Networking is a Black Art!
In anticipation of your help, thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
how are your airport extreme, time capsule, and airport express all connected to each other? What station is your MBP on?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by apollo11
220.3 Mb file copied from MBP to Seagate took about 2 mins.
Straight after the same file has taken 15 minutes to copy from MBP to the Timecapsule
When you copy directly to the disk you are usually limited by disk performance or in the case of USB2 by the bus.
However, when you copy to a disk that's attached to an AP Extreme or TC (NAS) you're limited by the fact that the AP Extreme or TC have to translate the AFP. Consumer-grade NAS solutions have notoriously slow CPUs and hence achieve much lower transfer rates compared to when you attach a disk directly to a computer with eSATA, FW, or USB (DAS).
In order to rule out wifi issues, you should try the transfers while having the Mac connected to the AP Extreme or TC directly through Gigabit Ethernet. The bottleneck you'll see there is the CPU in the AP Extreme or TC. That will define the maximum performance you can expect from your consumer NAS setup.
For better throughput you'll have to either go for more professional NAS solutions or back to DAS.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Timecapsule and Express and Extreme base station are wirelessly linked & are set up as "extend a network" . All are "n" protocol, MBP is on channel 1 selected automatically.
Extreme base station Signal / Noise: -51 dBm / -96 dBm , Transmit Rate: 130.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thank you Simon & Cold Warrrior. Ethernet connection to Time capsule renders a file transfer to minutes compared to hours wirelessly.
I would expect that?
The Time capsule is sat on a metal safe. Will this be dampening the signal significantly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yep, a safe could be a problem. Always keep all wifi routers as far away from metallic structure as possible.
Are you using WDS to "extend" your network? It would be best to connect the TC and AP Extreme over Ethernet if possible. WDS always comes with a performance penalty. My guess would be that's part of the reason for the discrepancy between the throughput to the TC and the AP Extreme.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for your help Simon,
Extreme base station is not WDS. I'm not sure what WDS means.
I'll move the TC away from the safe.
Thanks
Anoop
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|