|
|
DVD ripped and encoded/compressed using QT7
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi everyone,
Have a question re the above. I'm on Tiger and a PB 15" 1.25Ghz, 512MB memory. I have a couple of DVDs I would like to put permanently on my HD and was wondering if there's a way of doing this using the new codec in QT7. I understand that I have to use MacTheRipper or something similar to rip the CD first. I also have Popcorn but I think that only allows me to shrink/copy a DVD to a blank DVD and not to a .mov format movie.
Anyone have a good way of going about doing this?
Thanks in advance!
Regards,
Nubben
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, HandBrake definitely... it does H264!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Third supportive post for Handbrake. Works very well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for all your replies! So what I need then is MacTheRipper and HandBrake combo (and in that order)? Thanks in advance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
IIRC, Handbrake can convert the movie straight from DVD so you wouldn't have to use MacTheRipper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just started playing with Handbrake. It looks pretty nice. The only problem is that H.264 + AC3 audio isn't playable in Quicktime, only VLC. so, you're either stuck with VLC + AC3 or QT + AAC audio.
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
You have to have the entire movie done before Quicktime will play it. Trust me, I did the Matrix that way (took me forever but I did it)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
As far as AC3 in Quicktime, it is not natively supported but you can download and install a plugin for it--then there should be no problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, King
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does handrake do Quicktime H.264 or x264?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by bmedina
Does handrake do Quicktime H.264 or x264?
it uses x264, not QT's more optimized encoder. Since handbrake is cross-platform (OS X/Linux/BeOS), there don't seem to be any plans to switch to QT's encoder, which is kind of unfortunate. I guess someone could hack it in, though, since it's open source.
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Finland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by plastiqueusa
As far as AC3 in Quicktime, it is not natively supported but you can download and install a plugin for it--then there should be no problems.
AFAIK the AC3 plugin relies on the DivX codec for avi parsing, and the DivX codec only comes into action when the video is DivX/XviD.
If someone knows if it does work with h.264/AC3 combo, chime in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, King
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MaxPower2k3
it uses x264, not QT's more optimized encoder. Since handbrake is cross-platform (OS X/Linux/BeOS), there don't seem to be any plans to switch to QT's encoder, which is kind of unfortunate. I guess someone could hack it in, though, since it's open source.
H.264 isn't platform-specific. One can play back Quicktime's H.264 on Windows today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm talking about the encoder. QT doesn't use the x264 encoder, it uses Apple's more optimized encoder. Handbrake uses the open-source x264 encoder, which works across virtually every platform, but isn't as optimized (and so not as fast) on OS X as Apple's own encoder.
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MaxPower2k3
I'm talking about the encoder. QT doesn't use the x264 encoder, it uses Apple's more optimized encoder. Handbrake uses the open-source x264 encoder, which works across virtually every platform, but isn't as optimized (and so not as fast) on OS X as Apple's own encoder.
But the results ought to be the same or very close, no?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by chabig
But the results ought to be the same or very close, no?
I don't have QT pro, so I don't have any real evidence, but I've heard that Apple's encoder doesn't use a few of the features H.264 is capable of (I think CABAC or something like that is one of them) so that encoding is faster, so x264 may actually produce slightly better results. I'd imagine, practically, both produce fairly similar results, though.
Someone who has QT pro and has done side-by-side comparisons between the two encoders can give a more definitive answer, however.
|
"I start fires!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: England, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by chabig
But the results ought to be the same or very close, no?
Like how Apple's MPEG4 encoder produces results as good as third-party encoders?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, King
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MaxPower2k3
Handbrake uses the open-source x264 encoder, which works across virtually every platform, but isn't as optimized (and so not as fast) on OS X as Apple's own encoder.
What, it takes two months instead of one to encode a feature-length movie?
My guess is that x264 outperforms Apple's encoder, but it's just conjecture. Apple's encoder was quite a let down from the hype they gave it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Allston, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is there a way to convert the DVD into a quicktime movie and keep the 5.1 surround sound?
|
-- Jason
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Lew
Like how Apple's MPEG4 encoder produces results as good as third-party encoders?
MPEG4 ≠ H.264 (aside from part of the name)
Originally Posted by bmedina
My guess is that x264 outperforms Apple's encoder, but it's just conjecture. Apple's encoder was quite a let down from the hype they gave it.
What's wrong with Apple's H.264 encoder? It looks pretty damn good to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jasong
Is there a way to convert the DVD into a quicktime movie and keep the 5.1 surround sound?
If you extract the ac3 stream you can decode each channel separately with macAC3Decoder. Then you have to add each channel to the same movie and set each one to the correct channel in the audio settings. Then you can export the whole mess to one multichannel AAC track. If anyone knows of a more automated route please let me know.
Like how Apple's MPEG4 encoder produces results as good as third-party encoders?
MPEG4 ≠ H.264 (aside from part of the name)
Yes, but Apple = Apple, and they hyped their SP MPEG 4 codec just as hard as they did their h264 one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is there any way I can bookmark a .mov file? I have a DVD with music videos I'd like to convert but unfortunately the chapters have not been properly bookmarked so a new chapter starts before the video has finished or new chapter starts slightly in to a new video (conversion of VHS tape in to DVD). If I can't bookmark it I was thinking about breaking the tracks up per song and put them in iTunes. Would I be able to create on file and then edit it aftewards, similar to a wave editor? Thanks in advance. Nubben
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Finland
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by Jacke; Jun 9, 2005 at 01:42 PM.
Reason: spelling)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Jacke
Thanks for the link. And I love that name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, King
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
What's wrong with Apple's H.264 encoder? It looks pretty damn good to me.
First, it's excruciatingly slow to encode. Second, it doesn't take advantage of many H.264 features, like cabac and in-loop filtering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|