|
|
minor shareware debacle
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
Let's say I purchase a small shareware program that is relatively unknown but the demo suggests a grade B product. The price is $18 which seems a little steep, but I bite the bullet. Less than a week later that same shareware title is on temporary, week-long sale for $15.
Is it just my misfortune for not waiting a week and therefore I don't deserve some consideration for a $3 refund?
Would the answer be different if we added a couple of zeros on the ends of those figures?
I know in the realty business, a house is worth a much as it sells for. By that logic, if I was willing to shell out $18, I should be happy. I shouldn't try to contest the matter. Right?
Is this a question of ethics?
I know what my gut tells me, but I'd like to canvas this particularly bright group of individuals for your thoughts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Developer:
Sue that bastard.
heh. i figured that would be a common response. I'm not actually going to pursue the matter with the developer, but I am interested in the basic principles underlying what happened.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Let's say you buy a TV at your local electronics store. The next week, the same TV goes on sale. Has the store done anything wrong? No.
Would it be nice for the store to provide you with a small refund in order to build customer loyalty? Yes. Do they have to? No.
You bought the software at the wrong time. You can ask the developer to provide a small refund and he might agree, but he doesn't have to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Developer:
Sue that bastard.
For what, cutting his prices?!
I agree with dtriska. Send him an e-mail. Perhaps he will be accomodating, and help you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by dtriska:
Let's say you buy a TV at your local electronics store. The next week, the same TV goes on sale. Has the store done anything wrong? No.
Would it be nice for the store to provide you with a small refund in order to build customer loyalty? Yes. Do they have to? No.
You bought the software at the wrong time. You can ask the developer to provide a small refund and he might agree, but he doesn't have to.
Another thing to mention is that for small developers, most of the profits on a sale are gone when you have to issue a refund. On a $10 product, I pay $2 in credit processing fees. If I have to issue a credit, that's another $2, plus the $3 credit. So now my $10 program resulted in $3 profit. Hardly worth the effort.
If it's a small developer, just forget it. If it was worth what you paid for it, then it still is. If not, you should not have bought it.
|
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Allston, MA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Let's look at it the other way, say this developer raises his prices. Can he contact you to pay the difference?
It never hurts to ask, but no matter how many zeros there are at the end of the number, you are owed nothing.
-- Jason
PS for anyone who find discussions of this nature interesting, take a look at the Talmud (Jewish discussion on biblical law). There is a whole section on transactional purchases, discussing who is the buyer and who the seller, when is the sale complete, what are the buyer and sellers obligations to each other, and way more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
I did not know that talmud had in-depth discussion on transactions. that's very interesting. I agree that nothing is owed. The reason I was even questioning it is that I'm pretty sure companies like apple (i think) do some kinda, if you purchased within the last month or something and we've dropped our price you can get the difference. That got me to thinking: huh...is that a typical business response, an ethical obligation, or is it just being nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Off the Tobakoff
Status:
Offline
|
|
I agree with the former; when it's done, it's for customer loyalty and trying to build a better consumer base, but they really have no obligation to refund.
If some zeros were added to the end of the numbers, would it change anything? Sure, but it wouldn't mean the company you bought from owes you anything, it just means that you're probably going to be a little more pissed-off. Really, though, in this case, $3 is nothing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's always been an unwritten rule in retail that if you purchase something and it goes on sale within 7 days, you can come in and get a refund for the difference. Never tried this with a software vendor tho'. So while the precedent exists in other markets, it really does come down to the individuals involved in the situation.
But go ahead and ask. All the developer can do is say 'no'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by CharlesS:
For what, cutting his prices?!
Yes, what for? I was being sarcastic. This is probably a small software developer and people complain because they missed a $3 discount.
There is no law that requires to backdate a price reduction. And even if there were, the people who bought a week before you would complain. Or those who bought a month before...
|
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Jeezus, $3. Apple is guilty of far, far worse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|