 |
 |
Mac OS X beats Win XP in Quake 4 on MacBook Pro?!?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
But, but...OS X's OpenGL sucks!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
What texture quality settings were used on both? Geometry options? Wall marks? They've disclosed no details whatsoever.
I'll do my own tests some time.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Tomchu
What texture quality settings were used on both? Geometry options? Wall marks? They've disclosed no details whatsoever.
I'll do my own tests some time.
Oh come on now...you've never been interested in the details...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Connecticut
Status:
Offline
|
|
Maybe this has to do with the OS X version having better support for the two cores or something? Just a shot in the dark. (I remember they used to tout that with UT2k3/4, better multi-processor support.)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Bah!!! As long as i get my 43 frames per second, i can -still- PWN the lot of you on dial-up! >:-) 
|
Don't bully me, I got an Uzi... HOO-HAH!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Downtown Austin, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I doubt it. Quake 4 uses the Doom 3 engine, which runs by far faster on Windows.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top