Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Ahnuld in bed with crooks, Ken Lay and Enron.

Ahnuld in bed with crooks, Ken Lay and Enron.
Thread Tools
RooneyX
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2003, 10:12 PM
 
http://www.gregpalast.com/detail.cfm?artid=286&row=0

I am deeply unhappy to report on the accuracy of our report on the success of Ken Lay's plan to have his governor, Mr. Schwarzenegger, sabotage state lawsuits against the electricity cartel.

The following is just in from journalist Katherine Yurica:

Arnold to Settle Lawsuits for Pennies on the Dollar

The Yurica Report has learned that only three days after Mr. Schwarzenegger won his victory in California, an aide announced that the governor-elect intends to settle pending energy fraud lawsuits. This apparently includes the suit filed by Cruz Bustamante under the California statute, Civil Code section 17200 ,of the Unfair Practices Act. The purpose of the act �is to safeguard the public against the creation or perpetuation of monopolies and to foster and encourage competition� the Act expressly prohibits, �unfair, dishonest, deceptive, destructive, fraudulent and discriminatory practices by which fair and honest competition is destroyed or prevented.�

According to news talk show host Bernie Ward of KGO radio, San Francisco, who reported the story Friday night on his radio show, (October 10th), Schwarzenegger's aid stated that the governor-elect's administration did not want to be saddled with someone else's lawsuits. The Unfair Practices Act, however, has provisions that require businesses who profit from unfair practices to pay the victims those profits. Although the Act does not authorize recovery of damages in a representative action, according to Hiliary N. Rowen, an attorney from the law firm of Thelen Reid & Priest, �the plaintiff�who need not have been harmed by the challenged conduct�may seek injunctive and restitutionary relief, including the disgorgement of profits on behalf of all those injured.� (See Hiliary Rowen's article) .This provision would make the power companies, who profited an estimated $9 billion from the California energy scam, the losers.

In the meantime, Claire Cooper of the Sacramento Bee reported Friday on another lawsuit in the Federal Court. She reported the judges from the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals seemed skeptical of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission's (FERC) � contention that it acted legally three years ago, when it relied on competition among energy wholesalers to determine the cost of California's power supply and did not require them to file the rates they would charge.� California sued FERC, claiming it is due a refund of $9 billion in gouged profits because the Federal Power Act didn't authorize FERC to approve a fluctuating marketbased rate structure. The question is, does the governor-elect intend to settle the federal suit also?

Mr. Schwarzenegger's announcement to settle the lawsuits comes on the heels of an article written on the eve of the election by investigative reporter Greg Palast. Palast, whose reports appear on BBC television�s Newsnight, said that the Los Angeles-based Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights uncovered Enron internal memos regarding Mr. Schwarzenegger's secret meeting in May 2001 with the disgraced CEO of Enron, Kenneth Lay. The intent of the power company, according to Palast, was to sabotage the Davis-Bustamante plan to win back the $9 billion dollars in illegal profits earned by power moguls. The plan has worked so far. Clearly, Mr. Schwarzenegger should be questioned about his actions.
     
shmerek
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 19, 2003, 10:35 PM
 
That is pretty disappointing.
     
OldManMac
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 01:10 AM
 
If this is true, why should anyone be surprised?
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
     
Lerkfish
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 20, 2003, 07:47 AM
 
Originally posted by KarlG:
If this is true, why should anyone be surprised?
intriguing....makes one wonder about the whole recall thing, now, doesn't it?
The NRC really, REALLY, wanted a republican in that position....hm....
     
tie
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 07:21 PM
 
Originally posted by RooneyX:
Schwarzenegger's aid stated that the governor-elect's administration did not want to be saddled with someone else's lawsuits.
So we don't want the $9 billion they stole from us because it happened in a previous administration? Personally, I want the $9 billion back!!

I think Schwarzenegger's a crook if he wants to help Ken Lay get away with it.
     
thunderous_funker
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful Downtown Portland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 21, 2003, 08:18 PM
 
I was worried he might go through with this. What an ass.

I suppose this falls under the euphamism of making Kaleeforneya more "business friendly".
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -- Hunter S. Thompson
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,