|
|
Sarah Palin's Yahoo! account hacked
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apparently Anonymous has hacked into Sarah Palin's Yahoo! account.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/node/32838
Good thing she didn't use such an insecure service for government communication. If they can catch these criminals, I hope they're punished just as strongly as anyone who hacks into a regular person's personal email account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I still don't understand why people use web-based email accounts. Bleedin' awful way of doing things.
Don't your ISPs give you free POP accounts over there or something?
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
I still don't understand why people use web-based email accounts. Bleedin' awful way of doing things.
Don't your ISPs give you free POP accounts over there or something?
I never use them anymore, cuz it changes every time I switch ISPs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Are they sure this isn't a hoax?
I am still embarassed for Matt Damon taking the Sarah Palin-dinosaur satire seriously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Don't your ISPs give you free POP accounts over there or something?
Why would you want to be locked into your ISP? I change ISPs every time a better offer comes along.
Buiyng your own domain is the way to go, but I see why this isn't viable for most.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wikileaks is down. Looks pretty legit from the posted screenshots though.
Also looks like "anonymous" is a bit divided on the ethical issues involved in this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Unacceptable. No matter who the intended target was.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
Wikileaks is down. Looks pretty legit from the posted screenshots though.
Also looks like "anonymous" is a bit divided on the ethical issues involved in this.
Hmmm... So at least some of the people there have some sense of ethics. This was not justified... except to prove that Y! Mail isn't secure enough (which is a worrisome, since I use Y! Mail).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Somewhere in some other dimension, Dick Nixon is smiling a very wide, proud grin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Some kid is now facing a few years in PMITA prison, all because he could guess someone's password.
Of course, the Palin train-wreck continues...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
Also looks like "anonymous" is a bit divided on the ethical issues involved in this.
I don't think the ethics are any different from when they hacked Scientology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Palin-trainwreck or not, this is a shocking invasion of privacy.
My guess is that the "hack" is nothing more than guessing an insecure password, and not necessarily a reflection of the security of Y! email.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
I don't think the ethics are any different from when they hacked Scientology.
What indicates that it is the same 'anonymous' ?
What was exposed in the Scientology hack and how is it similar to this instance?
What are the ethical questions and why are the answers the same for you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by vmarks
What indicates that it is the same 'anonymous' ?
Except for the fact that they are claiming to be from Anonymous nothing, of course. Though, that is the very nature of Anonymous. Pretty much *anyone* can claim to be part of the group. It's probably unlikely that the exact same people were involved. Kind of like Al Qaeda.
Originally Posted by vmarks
What was exposed in the Scientology hack and how is it similar to this instance?
Scientology's private databases were hacked into by Anonymous and private documents were made public. I'm not certain if email was hacked into.
Originally Posted by vmarks
What are the ethical questions and why are the answers the same for you?
While Scientology has many allegations of questionable activity leveled against it, I don't think it's a matter for hackers to take it upon themselves to expose the organization by illegal means. Likewise, while there is question about Governor Palin's use of a Yahoo! email account for government business, I don't think it's a matter for hackers to try and prove through illegal means that she did.
It also highlights that government officials in sensitive positions probably shouldn't be using webmail, for official or personal communication.
(
Last edited by Wiskedjak; Sep 18, 2008 at 10:19 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
Palin-trainwreck or not, this is a shocking invasion of privacy.
My guess is that the "hack" is nothing more than guessing an insecure password, and not necessarily a reflection of the security of Y! email.
I don't think Yahoo! is terribly secure. A year ago I received an email to my Gmail account stating that the password for my Yahoo! account (which I use for Flickr) had been successfully changed. I never submitted a password change for my Yahoo! account. I was also using a word from the Algonquin language as my password, so it wasn't terribly easy to guess.
Fortunately, I was online at the time and the hacker hadn't changed the primary email or "secret questions" yet, so when I received the password-changed email, I was able to reset my password. I'm a pretty heavy Flickr user (was incredibly upset when Yahoo bought them), so I rotate and monitor my password pretty frequently now.
Though, no one made much of a fuss when *my* Yahoo! account was hacked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Washington (the state) USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The New Posts Button
Status:
Offline
|
|
I hope stuff like this doesn't become the mainstay of future elections.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you know just a little bit about a person, it can be very easy to guess the answers to their secret question - pet names, middle names, maiden names - all of this info for public figures could be out there. I got into my ex-girlfriend's yahoo account be guessing that she used her weird sister's name as a pet's name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
If you know just a little bit about a person, it can be very easy to guess the answers to their secret question - pet names, middle names, maiden names - all of this info for public figures could be out there. I got into my ex-girlfriend's yahoo account be guessing that she used her weird sister's name as a pet's name.
|
"Learn to swim"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Virginia Beach, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dork.
According to the hacker, he's the one who changed her password to popcorn.
|
I gotta have more cowbell.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ah, apparently I was mistaken. Ars said the password that was posted was "popcorn", I assumed it was the one she put on the account....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ham Sandwich
|
|
Is guessing someone's password really considered "hacking"?
If I guessed someone's Yahoo Mail password, read through their mail and posted screenshots of it, I could see it being a civil suit but not criminal. Or, is it just that she's a person in some sort of power and the rules are changed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by screamingFit
Is guessing someone's password really considered "hacking"?
If I guessed someone's Yahoo Mail password, read through their mail and posted screenshots of it, I could see it being a civil suit but not criminal. Or, is it just that she's a person in some sort of power and the rules are changed?
Well, the FBI wasn't involved when my Yahoo! account was briefly hijacked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The term "hacker" is a bit of a misnomer here. He just provided Yahoo with basic information about Palin and Yahoo gave him the password. I think "slightly tricky dude" is more accurate.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course odder is a word, you folks just pronounce it funny.
The guy's father is a State legislator in Tennessee. Perhaps soon to be a former State Legislator in Tennessee?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, whatever anyoen thinks about this, Sarah Palin is hawt and so are her daughters.
/just sayin'
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Sayf-Allah
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Update:someone has been indicted:
Son of Tenn. Democrat indicted in Palin hacking
KNOXVILLE, Tenn. (AP) - The son of a Democratic Tennessee state lawmaker pleaded not guilty Wednesday to hacking the e-mail account of Republican vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin.
David Kernell, 20, of Knoxville, Tenn. entered the plea in federal court in Knoxville, the same day prosecutors unsealed an indictment charging him with intentionally accessing Palin's e-mail account without authorization.
Kernell, an economics student at the University of Tennessee, was brought into court wearing handcuffs and shackles on his ankles.
He was released without posting bond, but the court forbade him from owning a computer and limited his Internet use to checking e-mail and doing class work.
Kernell's father is longtime state Rep. Mike Kernell of Memphis, chairman of Tennessee's House Government Operations Committee. The lawmaker has said he had nothing to do with the hacking incident.
David Kernell was indicted Tuesday by a federal grand jury in Knoxville and faces a maximum of five years in prison, a $250,000 fine and three years of supervised release. Trial is set for Dec. 16.
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Five years for reading a couple of emails? Good grief, you can kill someone and get less than that.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
So it was a prank.
BTW, it wasn't hacking (as in using a weakness of the code), AFAIK the password was reset after (correctly) answering the security questions.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yahoo!gate.
Dems are winning and shoot themselves in the foot. I wonder if the kid will crack under pressure? Would be funny if the DNC encouraged him to do this.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Shaddim
Yahoo!gate.
Dems are winning and shoot themselves in the foot. I wonder if the kid will crack under pressure? Would be funny if the DNC encouraged him to do this.
So, if the child of a Democrat commits a crime, all Democrats are responsible? If the child of a Republican commits a crime, are all Republicans responsible? Are you certain you want to open up that slippery slope?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
So, if the child of a Democrat commits a crime, all Democrats are responsible? If the child of a Republican commits a crime, are all Republicans responsible? Are you certain you want to open up that slippery slope?
"Would be funny if the DNC encouraged him to do this."
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Shaddim
"Would be funny if the DNC encouraged him to do this."
"Dems are winning and shoot themselves in the foot."
The only person shooting anyone in the foot was David Kernell allegedly shooting *himself* in the foot. But, nice try at generating rumor to suggest this was orchestrated by Democrats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
Five years for reading a couple of emails? Good grief, you can kill someone and get less than that.
That's the max he could get. I predict he cops a plea, and doesn't spend a lick of time in jail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
"Dems are winning and shoot themselves in the foot."
The only person shooting anyone in the foot was David Kernell allegedly shooting *himself* in the foot. But, nice try at generating rumor to suggest this was orchestrated by Democrats.
Yeah, must be congenital...
If you're winning by such a margin, why would you hack an opponent's email? Knowing full well that if you get caught it could look bad for your party?
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: The New Posts Button
Status:
Offline
|
|
Were they winning by a large margin when it was hacked?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Shaddim
Yeah, must be congenital...
If you're winning by such a margin, why would you hack an opponent's email? Knowing full well that if you get caught it could look bad for your party?
The kid is a /b/tard. I doubt it had anything to do with "the party's" plans.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why is it such a serious crime if it wasn't a government account? If someone breaks into my Yahoo! account do they get hauled off in chains?
I'm seriously asking this question. Does the fact that this personal Yahoo! account was owned by the governor make it any different from a personal account held be anyone else? I guess it could be considered treason or spying or something... but it seems to me that if you decide to go and use a free email account that bypasses state security and rules, then maybe you should have the exact same rights as any other schmo when you get hacked.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
So, if the child of a Democrat commits a crime, all Democrats are responsible? If the child of a Republican commits a crime, are all Republicans responsible? Are you certain you want to open up that slippery slope?
If the DNC wanted to do something like this, do you really think they would use a 20 yo kid of one of their members?
|
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chuckit
The kid is a /b/tard. I doubt it had anything to do with "the party's" plans.
Honestly, I don't think the party was involved. However, it is a really bad choice, especially if your father is a lawmaker for the opposing side.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Shaddim
Honestly, I don't think the party was involved. However, it is a really bad choice, especially if your father is a lawmaker for the opposing side.
Agreed. Perhaps he was trying to intentionally sabotage his fathers career? Do you think this may have some backlash on him?
|
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Rumor
If the DNC wanted to do something like this, do you really think they would use a 20 yo kid of one of their members?
*I* don't, but Shaddim certainly seemed to want to think they would, even though he's trying to seriously back-pedal from the statement.
Originally Posted by Shaddim
Dems are winning and shoot themselves in the foot.
... clearly says that he feels Democrats are responsible, despite his following attempts at spin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
*I* don't, but Shaddim certainly seemed to want to think they would, even though he's trying to seriously back-pedal from the statement.
... clearly says that he feels Democrats are responsible, despite his following attempts at spin.
Funny stuff.
Well, I have a staff meeting, and "those people" get upset when anyone is late, so "you guys" will have to excuse me while I attend. We can continue our conversation about "that one" when I return.
(Gotta admit, "some people" are just barrels of fun.)
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
So they're just glossing over that Palin was using several non-government email accounts to avoid an electronic trail?
It's too bad they don't prosecute every script kiddy that hacks a Yahoo, Hotmail, or Gmail account. They get (at most) community service and supervised parole with no computer access for a few months.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by olePigeon
So they're just glossing over that Palin was using several non-government email accounts to avoid an electronic trail?
She was?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
She was?
Yes. Like George Bush, she used private email accounts to avoid the Public Record laws.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|