Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Why do HDTV built-in scalers suck?

Why do HDTV built-in scalers suck?
Thread Tools
BasketofPuppies
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 02:23 PM
 
Upconverting DVD players, standalone video scalers and the like should not have to exist. HDTV sets have built-in scalers, but they all do lousy jobs of converting non-native resolutions full-screen, giving consumers a reason to buy hardware that does something built into their HDTV sets.

Is there a reason for this? It's understandable that some cheap HDTV set would be cheap in part because the manufacturer cut corners by using a cheap scaler, but what excuse is there for top-of-the-line HDTV sets having lousy built-in scalers? You shouldn't have to spend hundreds or thousands of dollars on what should be redundant products after paying thousands of dollars on your HDTV set to get a good experience out of it.
inscrutable impenetrable impregnable inconceivable
     
Dakarʒ
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 02:24 PM
 
Low self-esteem.
     
peeb
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 02:30 PM
 
Poor parenting?
     
analogue SPRINKLES
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 02:31 PM
 
Samsungs are bad for SD signals and audio delays. Some are good like Sonys.

I agree it is stupid though, but when this better scalers costs $20 more and times that by 100,000 the difference is important.

Sony makes you pay for that difference but for me it is well worth it.
     
Timo
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: New York City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 02:46 PM
 
Given the varieties of control options and the amount of circuitry on my video scaler / deinterlacer / hub, I'd say TV manufacturers don't want to open that kettle of fish. The whole SD/HD versus other video input formats is an interface nightmare.
     
Eriamjh
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 06:57 PM
 
Cheap displays with cheap components. There are better sets out there that cost a lot mroe. They do a better job. A good scaler can cost more than a cheap display. There's more to HD than just the resolution.

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
starman
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Union County, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 07:14 PM
 
Buy HD/Blu-Ray if you can. Problem solved.

Home - Twitter - Sig Wall-Retired - Flickr
     
goMac
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 07:35 PM
 
I don't mind the scaler in my Samsung. It's the compression on my Cable that really ticks me off.
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
     
dlefebvre
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Where my body is
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
May 31, 2007, 09:14 PM
 
Built-in TV scalers will never do that great of a job because the signal they display is so compressed, especially cable. It ends up scaling compression artefacts an making it worse. In HDTV we go from a 1.5Gbps uncompressed signal to 19.4Mbps on cable. In SD it goes from a 270Mbps uncompressed signal to 3.5Mbps on cable. So basically to go from a 720x480 source to a 1920x1080 result, a scaler has to scale by almost 700%. Try to scale an image by 700% in Photoshop just for fun. I work for a TV broadcaster and the upconverters (scalers) we use are about 20,000$ each.
( Last edited by dlefebvre; Jun 2, 2007 at 12:35 AM. )
     
ReggieX
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 2, 2007, 01:29 PM
 
Because life is precious, and god, and the bible.
The Lord said 'Peter, I can see your house from here.'
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 2, 2007, 01:31 PM
 
It's about appreciating what you have. The grass is always greener on the other side.
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
SirCastor
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, UT USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 2, 2007, 03:37 PM
 
It might be an attempt to move consumers away from technology they already own. They try to upscale their DVD stuff into HD realize it's awful, and end up buying a bluray or HDDVD device. Good way to jumpstart the industry which is otherwise not doing to well.
2008 iMac 3.06 Ghz, 2GB Memory, GeForce 8800, 500GB HD, SuperDrive
8gb iPhone on Tmobile
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,