Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > macOS > Filevault tells me I need 4052 MORE GB to encrypt?! WHAT?!

Filevault tells me I need 4052 MORE GB to encrypt?! WHAT?!
Thread Tools
JustinHorne
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 26, 2007, 06:46 PM
 
Certainly a shock to me, with my 120 gb macbook....
Here's a screenshot:


Crazy huh? Running 10.4.10, any thoughts?
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 26, 2007, 10:41 PM
 
"Try emptying the trash"

How Microsoftian of you Apple!

V
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 26, 2007, 10:44 PM
 
When the amount is that big, it should replace the bit about emptying the trash with "HOLY ****!!!"

Oh, and I don't have much experience with FileVault, so I can't really help, sorry. I have heard that it uses disk space very strangely. I'd recommend storing sensitive files on an encrypted disk image (you can create these with Disk Utility) — it's the same thing FileVault does, only you have more control over it.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
voodoo
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 26, 2007, 11:07 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
When the amount is that big, it should replace the bit about emptying the trash with "HOLY ****!!!"
Hehe

Indeed!

V
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
     
frdmfghtr
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 26, 2007, 11:38 PM
 
First, I wouldn't use FileVault; it saves yor home directory as one encrypted volume, and if any part of it get corrupted, you lost everything in the home directory.

Second, to get around this problem, move as much as you can out of the home directory to some other temporary folder outside the home directory structure. FileVault then only has to encrypt a small amount of data initially. Once FileVault is set up, move everything back into it's original location in the home directory.

Lastly, seriously reconsider your choice. Even Apple support recommends against using FileVault. If you want to keep some of your data encrypted, create an encrypted volume using Disk Utility. You end up with a .dmg file that requires a password to mount, is encrypted, and can be easily backed up like any other file.
     
JustinHorne  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2007, 03:25 AM
 
Well, I guess I just won't use FV then...

Either way, it sure is a screwy thing, something I've never seen before!

And yes, the whole, "go empty your trash" is rather Microsoft of them...
     
MindFad
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2007, 10:08 AM
 
If you're packing 4TB in your trash, it's time to empty.
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2007, 10:28 AM
 
Yeah, do not use it. Please. Use encrypted disk images for the files you want to encrypt, but there's no reason to use FileVault. It's just asking for trouble.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Person Man
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2007, 07:35 PM
 
Originally Posted by frdmfghtr View Post
\Even Apple support recommends against using FileVault.
I call bull on this one. Why would Apple even offer FileVault if they recommend against using it?
     
jtrwallace
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2007, 07:55 PM
 
This is the thing. I used FileVault for a year and had no problems with it. I understood that by using it, you have to periodically optimize FileVault so as to clear up space on your hard drive. I was ok with that because I wanted my computer to be very secure, considering it was an included feature of OS X. The thing is, FileVault needs as much free space as your current home directory fills up in order to initialize and to remove. When I first used it, I had no problems as I had that much free space on my internal PowerBook Drive. But when I decided I'd rather have to not deal with optimizing and losing space periodically then regaining it, I turned FileVault off and it gave me that same exact error. All I had to do was move my videos and some programs to my external hard drive, let it turn itself off without that error, and then put them back in my home directory.
Now, about Apple recommending not using it. I can second that. I don't mean to say that Apple or Steve Jobs recommends against using it, but I do mean to say that Support representatives would rather you not use it because it can cause unnecessary problems. I took my PowerBook FileVault enabled to an Apple Store to have the optical drive replaced and when I got it back the next day the "genius" asked me if I was a government official. I was confused and said "And if I was?????" He replied that FileVault is really unnecessary and causes more problems than its worth UNLESS I'm hiding some Nuclear missile launch codes that are very very top secret. I told him that I would do whatever the hell I want with my computer and that Apple would not have included this function unless it could be useful to normal users.
My recommendation: Only use it if you have sensitive documents AND you leave your computer sitting places where it could be stolen easily.
     
TETENAL
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 27, 2007, 08:48 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Yeah, do not use it. Please. Use encrypted disk images for the files you want to encrypt, but there's no reason to use FileVault. It's just asking for trouble.
That's nonsense. There are good reasons to encrypt all of your data on a portable device that has some risk of being stolen. My address book alone is reason enough to have encryption on. A lot of other data is sensitive, even if you might not think about it. Of course that there are good reasons to encrypt your home folder is no excuse for Apple to have such a crappy implementation.FileVault is lacking in a lot of areas. It's not possible to exclude stuff from encryption. Music library and public (!) folder come to mind here. It's prone to corruption and it has bugs when being turned on and off (see original post). Again, all that doesn't mean you should refrain from protecting your data. However, what you should do is have a complete and up to date (daily), unencrypted backup of your data (which obviously stays at home). Data loss can strike you anyway, whether you have FileVault on or not, so you need a complete and up to date backup regardless. If you take care of that, FileVault is a good choice to have on for many users of a portable computer.
     
Cadaver
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 28, 2007, 11:56 PM
 
I travel with my laptop, so I need to use encryption. While I do use strong passwords and Open Firmware lock on my MacBook Pro, it would be trivial to disassemble the machine, pull the HD and view the contents without impediment. I have sensitive HIPAA-protected material on my laptop, not to mention access codes to the VPN at work, and of course the web cookie with my MacNN password! While creating an encrypted disk image for the occasional item works alright, I simply have too much to keep on a separate (virtual) disk volume.

I use FileVault and encrypted virtual memory. The Open Firmware lock helps prevent booting the machine off CD or into target disk mode. And I do not put any data in the Public folder and do not have root user enabled. I'm a bit paranoid about security, but at least I know that if my machine should be stolen, the data on the machine will remain inaccessible to anyone but me (and the NSA).

Personally, I'd like it if the whole drive could be encrypted - applications, preferences, library folder and all.

The PC laptop I have on order has a TPM chip which will work with Vista Ultimate's BitLocker disk encryption. Too bad the MacBook Pro doesn't have a TPM in it.

While a data corruption can destroy your entire FileVault, regular backups will minimize any data loss. You do make frequent, routine backups, right...!? And yes, the backups of the contents of my FileVaulted machine are also encrypted.
     
cybergoober
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Newport News, VA USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 29, 2007, 06:16 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cadaver View Post
…but at least I know that if my machine should be stolen, the data on the machine will remain inaccessible to anyone but me (and the NSA).
Don't know how true this is, but we had a meeting at my last job with our Apple reps. They were talking about how they had spent some time working with the NSA. Apparently the NSA had a cluster of machines that could crack the strongest Windows passwords in about 16 seconds. They then went on to say that the NSA couldn't crack FileVault. Like I said this is purely anecdotal and I don't know how accurate it is, but that is what Apple's corporate reps are telling customers.
     
rjt1000
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Asia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 29, 2007, 09:58 AM
 
Originally Posted by Cadaver View Post
Personally, I'd like it if the whole drive could be encrypted - applications, preferences, library folder and all.

The PC laptop I have on order has a TPM chip which will work with Vista Ultimate's BitLocker disk encryption. Too bad the MacBook Pro doesn't have a TPM in it.
FYI: Seagate is offering a laptop hard drive with built in hardware based encryption. So far, only one PC manufacturer is using it. Would need to be implemented by Apple, though. Not something you can just drop in:

Seagate Technology - Momentus� 5400 FDE.2 Hard Drives
Seagate Delivers Industry's Strongest Security for ASI Laptop Computers
     
frdmfghtr
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 2, 2007, 12:04 AM
 
Originally Posted by Person Man View Post
I call bull on this one. Why would Apple even offer FileVault if they recommend against using it?
Beats me...but I recall seeing in some forum (maybe here somewhere) that somebody was told by an Apple support rep that he didn't recommend using it, as it could create more problems than it is worth.

So what I heard was second- or maybe third-hand, but that's why I said it. Too bad that FileVault doesn't do the on-the-fly encrypting on a file-by-file basis so if something does get toasted, the damage is limited to an individual file.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:28 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,