|
|
The new Mac mini - i5 vs i7?
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Looking at the just released new minis, I see the high-end version also has an option for the i7 vs i5 processor.
Is there a significant performance bump to be had here? Under what conditions? Its $100 more...
|
Uisce
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
As far as I can tell, it's these two processors, and the differences are 200 MHz base clock, 200 MHz turbo clock and 1 MB of L2 cache, as well as support for something called "Intel Insider" which seems to be HDCP on steroids. Never heard of it before. It's basically 200 MHz more clockspeed, giving you a slight boost across the board.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had heard something about superior multi-threading on an i7, but I have no idea how valuable that would be for OS X...
|
Uisce
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
The L2 cache should help for things like audio production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uisce
I had heard something about superior multi-threading on an i7, but I have no idea how valuable that would be for OS X...
This is the problem with Intel's naming scheme. For the desktop processors used in the iMac, the i7 model supports Hyperthreading while the i5 model does not. The mini uses mobile processors (you can tell because they're all dualcores, not quadcores), which all support Hyperthreading.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami
Status:
Offline
|
|
A similar upgrade is available for the iMac line, but it costs $200. I'm trying to figure out myself if it is worth it.
For the 21.5" 2.7ghz quadcore to 2.8ghz quadcore i7
For the 27" 3.1 quadcore i5 to 3.4ghz quadcore i7
Did some quick research, found this site: http://www.brighthub.com/computing/h...les/48391.aspx
"Currently, the Core i5 processor brand makes up most of Intel's Sandy Bridge processor line. The prices of these processors range from $177 to $216 with base clock speeds between 2.8 GHz and 3.3 GHz. Intel only offers two Core i7 products, the Core i7-2600 and Core i7-2600K, both of which have a 3.4 GHz base clock speed. The i7-2600 has a price tag of $294.
As you may have guessed, paying about $80 more for the 100 MHz clock speed increase between the fastest i5 and the i7 isn't a great deal. The main reason to pay this additional cash for a i7 is hyper-threading, but this advantage will only be evident if you frequently use programs that can actually make use of 8 threads.
For most users, the i5 is clearly the better deal. The i5-2500 makes the most sense in my opinion, as it offers an extremely quick base clock speed of 3.3 GHz for about $200. Of course, the value of this is subject to change in the future as Intel fleshes out its product line with new models."
(
Last edited by Sosa; Jul 20, 2011 at 04:49 PM.
)
|
2011 iMac 2.7 i5, 16gb RAM, 1TB HD
Previous Macs: Apple IIc+, iMac 350 G3, iBook 700 G3, G4 Powerbooks 12" 1ghz & 15" 1.67ghz
Join Team MacNN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wonder about the power consumption. Apple is specifying 85W. What was the previous wattage? Is the new mini silent?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
By themselves small clock speed increases are seldom worth much. However the devil is in the details, because Apple often includes other things like more VRAM, or cache, or whatever.
-Allen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Miami
Status:
Offline
|
|
So I made up my mind and purchased a refurbished 2.7 i5 for $1250, passing over a new 2.8 i7 for $1500 (including the $100 back to school gift card). I decided that $250 was too much for a small performance improvement, although I would have been willing to pay the $180 educational pricing upgrade if the refurbished iMac wasn't available. A week ago there were refurbished i7 available for $1450, but I don't feel badly about saving $200 there also!
Picked up Harmon Kardon speakers with the savings, and a refurbished Apple TV for $85!
|
2011 iMac 2.7 i5, 16gb RAM, 1TB HD
Previous Macs: Apple IIc+, iMac 350 G3, iBook 700 G3, G4 Powerbooks 12" 1ghz & 15" 1.67ghz
Join Team MacNN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down by the river
Status:
Offline
|
|
I built a small HTPC with the 35W Core I3 2300T and it's about as fast as my 1st gen MacPro...kind of bugs me but those new Core Ix chips are fricking fast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|