 |
 |
Are cell phones hurting the watch industry? (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does someone want to give me $1200?
Because I've been lusting after this watch for a while now, but I cannot bring myself to pay that much money for a glorified fashion accessory.
|
|
inscrutable impenetrable impregnable inconceivable
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: In the hearts and minds of MacNNers
Status:
Offline
|
|
The size of the bump surrounding where the knob is kinda turns me off, but it is one of the nicer watches in this thread.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by zro 
Cell phones are usually OK for telling the time... until you need to see the clock while on a call. I actually stopped wearing a watch but found myself asking the other party what time it was while on a call. I'd feel like such a dumbass. Like my big brother always used to say, "Time to get a watch."
iPhones show the time during a call.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
But it's difficult to see a screen when your ear is covering it.
Oh, and that "bump" is not as big as it looks in that picture. (You would think that Movado, of all companies, would be sure that its products didn't look ugly in its promotional materials.)
|
|
inscrutable impenetrable impregnable inconceivable
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top