|
|
Manned Space Flight: Private Enterprise v. Government
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
The jury seems to be out on this issue. It is surprising that the US has no means of sending astronauts into space. However, SpaceX is sending a test capsule to the ISS in November, meaning that the US may quickly regain its manned space travel ability.
The government contractor approach to spaceflight could turn out to be highly successful. Boeing, BAE Systems, etc., are all shining examples of how the government and private enterprise can team up to develop excellent defense systems (no sarcasm here--they're excellent companies).
It is essential that the US remains competitive in space flight. Obama's greatest legacy may turn out to be his decision to unleash the private sector into space travel. It could rapidly speed up progress, while lowering costs (hopefully, we won't here any more of those pie-in-the-sky commitments to send humans to Mars in 30 or 40 years).
What do you all think?
PS: if the government contractor model fails, I have a gut feeling that the Air Force will ramp up its space abilities, which could have bad consequences.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
PS: if the government contractor model fails, I have a gut feeling that the Air Force will ramp up its space abilities, which could have bad consequences.
How so?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Garden of Paradise Motel, Suite 3D
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
PS: if the government contractor model fails, I have a gut feeling that the Air Force will ramp up its space abilities, which could have bad consequences.
I don't see that as troublesome at all. Let them spend bucks on something that will matter in 10 years rather than upkeep on a fleet of stealth bombers that aren't stealthy anymore.
The private enterprise approach will work right up until someone is killed in the process, and then lawsuits will tie up the industry in a matter of days, and for years. The NASA model works because they are the aggregator, and as such can't be sued (effectively) for negligence with something that is inherently dangerous.
PE might be able to do it offshore, but not in this litigious country of ours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
What legal system do you sue under if you're killed or maimed in orbit? Is the space station or modules considered to be part of any country, like embassies?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, NASA is a federal agency and is therefore protected by the doctrine of sovereign immunity--you can only sue them with their own consent.
Government contractors also (usually) fall under the protection of sovereign immunity, which is why Boeing, Lockheed, etc., continue to build planes, helicopters, and other such systems that result in non-defense related deaths all the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
What legal system do you sue under if you're killed or maimed in orbit?
Easy. Just look down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Easy. Just look down.
Which way is "down" with no gravity?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
The negative PR resulting in an astronaut's death inside of a privately built, government contracted spacecraft would be roughly akin to a test pilot dying in a Harrier jet or helicopter crash. It's a federal government employee dying while piloting a risky, privately built piece of machinery, undertaking a highly dangerous job.
It would be nothing like the PR fallout if a Virgin Galactic craft went down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
Which way is "down" with no gravity?
There's always gravity. Weightlessness around our planet is simply perpetual falling.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
Which way is "down" with no gravity?
Once you've been killed in space, it's pretty much all down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wonder how many people the Sovs killed actually in space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|