|
|
When it comes to danger, cigarettes and alcohol beat ecstasy, LSD and cannabis (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Sorry are you saying I am the one trolling or he is trolling me?
He seems to be trying to disagree with anything you say whether there's a basis for it or not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Gossamer
He seems to be trying to disagree with anything you say whether there's a basis for it or not.
Ya he is just one of those MacNN ding-a-lings. Like I care about his approval though so he can go nuts.
Nice to know trying to discrediting me is that important to him, he must be threatened by me.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
How many people here have ever seen an angry high from someone stoned?
Me, never.
Booze... all the damn time.
Ditto. I've been confused while high, but never angry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Gossamer
You can get arrested for eating cheetos?
I was wondering the same thing. When I'm high I either:
1. Watch a movie, eat lots of food
2. Play videogames, eat lots of food
3. Listen to music, eat lots of food
4. Go see a concert, eat lots of food
5. Cook or bake food, then eat a lot of it
6. Paint, eat lots of food
7. Eat lots of food, wander around the city.
I'm never driving, doing anything dangerous, or anything I can think of that would get me into trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Oozinator
I was wondering the same thing. When I'm high I either:
1. Watch a movie, eat lots of food
2. Play videogames, eat lots of food
3. Listen to music, eat lots of food
4. Go see a concert, eat lots of food
5. Cook or bake food, then eat a lot of it
6. Paint, eat lots of food
7. Eat lots of food, wander around the city.
I'm never driving, doing anything dangerous, or anything I can think of that would get me into trouble.
Same here. When I am high it is like being a kid again and you get overly excited at the suggestion of making cookies.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
So? The results would be different if they were done a week ago?
It takes time to compile information and come up with conclusions.
Originally Posted by Gossamer
So you're saying it's not relevant? It was posted August 7th, so it would have been hard to link to it before then.
You need to stop trolling SWG.
Originally Posted by Gossamer
He seems to be trying to disagree with anything you say whether there's a basis for it or not.
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Ya he is just one of those MacNN ding-a-lings. Like I care about his approval though so he can go nuts.
Nice to know trying to discrediting me is that important to him, he must be threatened by me.
Right, you muppets.
My comment was merely attempting to illustrate that this is old news, and that the New Scientist aren't exactly being on the ball.
Here's an excerpt from the report:
Perhaps the strongest indicator of discontent over the current ABC classification system came in January 2006, when the then Home Secretary, Rt. Hon. Charles Clarke, announced that he would be undertaking a root and branch review of the ABC system.
So, this debate has been going on for ages, like I said. I've known about these results for quite a while.
Nothing to do with trolling SWG. If you actually notice what I was replying to, you'll see that it was the words and URL of the article - not SWG's words (which were specifically edited out). Moreover, you'll notice that I didn't actually give an opinion about the content of the report and thus didn't agree or disagree with whatever stance SWG is taking.
So, you know, go screw yourselves. Idiots.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
My comment was merely attempting to illustrate that this is old news, and that the New Scientist aren't exactly being on the ball.
Again, who cares?
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Again, who cares?
You do, obviously. Else you wouldn't have launched an offensive at my comment.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
every one I know that gets high, including my roommate and myself, its all about chilling. When drunk, thats when we all end up in trouble usally.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
You do, obviously. Else you wouldn't have launched an offensive at my comment.
Offensive? All I said was who cares. I guess that is you cuz you're the one with your panties in a twist
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Offensive? All I said was who cares.
No, you said:
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Ya he is just one of those MacNN ding-a-lings. Like I care about his approval though so he can go nuts.
Nice to know trying to discrediting me is that important to him, he must be threatened by me.
Sure looks like an offensive to me. You launch with the name-calling then imply that I must be threatened by you. I mean, how is that not an offensive?
If you think that my posting a comment about the New Scientist's lack of timeliness is somehow discrediting you, you need to get yourself off to see a shrink. Really.
Why would I feel threatened by you, outside of you gaining 150 lbs and sharing a prison-shower with me? I happen to agree with the report.
You've made this into something it's not. As usual. Now, that's either because you have difficulty with reading comprehension (in which case go see about some community college classes) or you have paranoia (in which case go see the aforementioned shrink). Or both.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: out of service area
Status:
Offline
|
|
Dude... seriously, do a bong hit & settle down
|
It looks just like a telefunken' U-47 - Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jckalen
Dude... seriously, do a bong hit & settle down
Ya totally, good example of angry drunk vs. pothead
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jckalen
Dude... seriously, do a bong hit & settle down
Dude, I am settled down. But I ain't gonna let folks get away with posting sh!t about me simply because they can't read properly.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Ya totally, good example of angry drunk vs. pothead
I don't drink or do pot. Try again. I'm thinking like ya, totally good example of someone who can read properly vs someone who can't.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Why would I feel threatened by you, outside of you gaining 150 lbs and sharing a prison-shower with me?
That is effing classic. Hahaha
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
I don't drink or do pot. Try again. I'm thinking like ya, totally good example of someone who can read properly vs someone who can't.
So you're still getting all defensive towards me when I didn't give a **** and Gossamer started it.
Way to prove the point he made even more
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pretentiously Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
So you're still getting all defensive towards me when I didn't give a **** and Gossamer started it.
Right. So you didn't call me a "ding-a-ling" (whatever that is)? So, having not called me that, there's no need for me to get defensive towards you. OK. Whatever you say.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Finished? Or still feel threatened?
If you called me a ding-a-ling I wouldn't care. Just like I don't care that this study is 6 months old.
If you carry on I don't care either so whatever knocks your socks off..
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Landos Mustache
Finished? Or still feel threatened?
Why? Have you been on the "Weight Gain 4000"? Beefcake? Beeeeeeefcaaaaaaake?
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: out of service area
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
It looks just like a telefunken' U-47 - Zappa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jckalen
Right click open in new tab
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Gossamer
Right click open in new tab
Aww, I love kitties.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: "Working"
Status:
Offline
|
|
They're so exciting they're about to hug!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
I don't drink or do pot. Try again. I'm thinking like ya, totally good example of someone who can read properly vs someone who can't.
you should smoke a J, might do you some good
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ali-g on drugs! YouTube - Ali-G Drugs
By the way, LSD is as non-toxic as you can get.
Weed in small quantities is also not a problem. If you smoke once a day, it does become problematic though.
It is NOT true that Ecstasy is "soft" on your health.
Alcohol and cigarettes. The worst drugs I've taken in my whole life. Cigarettes give me day-long headaches and alcohol makes me sleepy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
LSD stays in your brainstem and can cause latent episodes many years aftre the initial use. It can also trigger schizophrenia.
Shrooms are far safer than acid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sek929
LSD stays in your brainstem and can cause latent episodes many years aftre the initial use. It can also trigger schizophrenia.
Shrooms are far safer than acid.
There is no medical evidence that LSD stays in your body.
What the latent episodes you are describing seem to affect 0.1 to 1% of the users.
see HPPD Online.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I stand corrected Ambush, after checking Erowid it seems all the LSD is metabolised out of your system faster even than psylocibin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
But you can always tell a pot smoker in postmortem observation. (It grays the brain according to my physics teacher, the same one who would tell us things like "never carry a knife that's bigger than 12 inches or carry more than 999 grams of cocaine, otherwise it's a felony rather than a misdemeanor")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
999 grams?!!
What?
One ounce of coke will get you in big trouble.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sek929
999 grams?!!
What?
One ounce of coke will get you in big trouble.
According to my teach, if you don't have a kilo, they won't be able to get you with the "intention to distribute" which makes it a felony.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|