 |
 |
Dual 2.7 users - what's your Seti performance?
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have to know what your performance is with the dual 2.7.
Inquiring minds HAVE to know.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the tall grass prairie next to a compass plant
Status:
Offline
|
|
And you folks with the 3Ghz dual core MP prototypes.
Spill the beans on your performance!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Todd Madson
I have to know what your performance is with the dual 2.7.
Inquiring minds HAVE to know.
With the unoptimiated 4.35
Measured floating point speed 1446.53 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 3672.8 million ops/sec
With the Adventurous G5/Altivec enabled patch (dropped into the BONICManager/Contents/Resources folder and renamed "Bonic")
Measured floating point speed 2426.7 million ops/sec
Measured integer speed 8015.2 million ops/sec
If I understand correctly, that's per CPU.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's great. What I meant is:
How long does it take to complete a block on average in hours?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mile High City
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Todd Madson
That's great. What I meant is:
How long does it take to complete a block on average in hours?
Todd, can you specify the project you are interested in. I am guessing SETI, but team MacNN is involved in so many it would help to know which one you are specifically wanting to know about.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Minneapolis, MN USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sigh. I've been running the conventional CLI Seti @ Home (pre-Boinc) since its inception
and mostly on a vintage sawtooth G4/400 with 2 gigs of ram and such. I remember in its
early days when I could manage 4.5-5 hours a block. No more. With the release of 3.x
I ended up getting somewhere in the range of THIRTEEN HOURS per block. I eventually
stopped it and just occasionally used my wife's iMac G4 (1.25 GHZ) for Seti periodically
and my self-built PC (2.2 ghz). Now that I have a G5 dual Mac in the house I want to see
if I can optimize it for continuing this experiment.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In the tall grass prairie next to a compass plant
Status:
Offline
|
|
How about someone with one of the Mactel boxes from Apple?
Let me think, how would that work. The client would have to be re-written. I presume there is not a Mactel client yet.
Do the new developer boxes have the Rosetta chip?
Forget that NDA and spill whatever beans there are to spill! :-)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Microns
How about someone with one of the Mactel boxes from Apple?
Let me think, how would that work. The client would have to be re-written. I presume there is not a Mactel client yet.
Do the new developer boxes have the Rosetta chip?
Forget that NDA and spill whatever beans there are to spill! :-)
Rosetta chip? There's no chip, it's software.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top