Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Mac News > Apple granted permanent injunction against legacy Samsung devices

Apple granted permanent injunction against legacy Samsung devices
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2016, 10:03 AM
 
Apple has been granted a motion for a permanent injunction against a number of Samsung mobile devices, as the patent battle between the manufacturers continues. Issued by California District Judge Lucy Koh, the injunction effectively prevents Samsung from selling a range of smartphones ruled to be infringing on three Apple-owned patents within the United States, though the list of items affected by the sales ban consists of legacy devices not typically sold or sought after by customers.

The injunction, stemming from Apple's second patent infringement win against Samsung, relates to patents covering data detection and linking, slide-to-unlock, and autocorrect, and will come into force in 30 days time. The devices affected include the Galaxy Nexus, Note, Note II, S II, SIII, Admire, and Stratosphere, as well as a small number of variants, with the number of older devices suggests the sales ban will not greatly affect Samsung.

Samsung Galaxy SIII
Samsung Galaxy SIII


"The Court finds that Apple will suffer irreparable harm if Samsung continues its use of the Infringing features," states the order, continuing "that monetary damages cannot adequately compensate Apple for this resulting harm, and that the balance of equities and public interest favor entry of a permanent injunction." The 2014 verdict awarded Apple only $120 million, far short of the $2.2 billion it was after, but Apple was quick to demand a retrial and triple the damages for willful infringement.

Observer Florian Mueller suggests the sales injunction may be a significant accomplishment for Apple's counsel for years of effort, but it "isn't going to have any direct impact" for Samsung. Aside from the age of the devices, Mueller notes two patents may be invalid, and one may not have been infringed upon "under the appropriate claim construction."

( Last edited by NewsPoster; Jan 19, 2016 at 03:40 PM. )
     
Flying Meat
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: SF
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2016, 01:22 PM
 
Just in time!
     
Long Time Lurker
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2010
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 19, 2016, 03:17 PM
 
Nit: I think you mean "sought" not "seeked".
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:40 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,