Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

Zimphire · Sep 18, 2002, 04:13 PM

Originally posted by starman:

Have you even READ the thread I originally wrote? You're saying the exact same things I did.

Mike

So, What does that matter? You are STILL whining about me complaining. Ironic huh?

Please show me said thread. I will read it and give you a answer.

Demonhood · Sep 18, 2002, 04:18 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:
But not everyone got their sig changed. It was what a 2 hour notice I got? Come on, lets start taking responsibilities for our actions Demon. And stop making excuses. It was not a system wide effort, and people WERE singled out.

hahahahahahahaha. that'd be interesting if it wasn't such a blatant lie.

you were sent your first warning:
09-13-2002 08:42 AM
you changed your sig to something that was smaller, but still in violation.

you were sent your second warning:
09-16-2002 07:47 PM
and i'm not sure how long after that happened that your sig was changed (wasn't me).

so please, enough with the victim act. you were sent the warnings because i noticed your signature (becuase you post a lot in the lounge). you were sent a second one because you protested and created a NEW sig that was still too big. so you have no room to complain.

philzilla · Sep 18, 2002, 04:27 PM

hey Zimph, how big were your Sine ones? were they too big too?

we should ask maxelson to assemble all the children in a circle and read Much Ado About Nothing to them. i never read the thing myself, it just has a fitting title

Lerkfish · Sep 18, 2002, 04:57 PM

Hey! philzilla! your sig is too SMALL!

philzilla · Sep 18, 2002, 05:03 PM

why you, i oughta!!!

L'enfanTerrible · Sep 18, 2002, 06:08 PM

Originally posted by Demonhood:

hahahahahahahaha. that'd be interesting if it wasn't such a blatant lie.

you were sent your first warning:
09-13-2002 08:42 AM
you changed your sig to something that was smaller, but still in violation.

you were sent your second warning:
09-16-2002 07:47 PM
and i'm not sure how long after that happened that your sig was changed (wasn't me).

so please, enough with the victim act. you were sent the warnings because i noticed your signature (becuase you post a lot in the lounge). you were sent a second one because you protested and created a NEW sig that was still too big. so you have no room to complain.

I was only sent one warning.

Demonhood, you are wrong in this case. Replacing the sigs with those violator images was wrong (especially since you singled out a few of us), and skirting this issue is cowardly.

Your "guidelines" are bul!sh!t and you don't even follow them, but you call us violators for not adhering to them.

Demonhood · Sep 18, 2002, 07:11 PM

Originally posted by L'enfanTerrible:
I was only sent one warning.

Demonhood, you are wrong in this case. Replacing the sigs with those violator images was wrong (especially since you singled out a few of us), and skirting this issue is cowardly.

Your "guidelines" are bul!sh!t and you don't even follow them, but you call us violators for not adhering to them.

1) the text you replied to wasn't to you.
2) i didn't replace your signature.
3) i follow the guidelines.
4) they aren't my guidelines. they were decided upon by quite a few admins and moderators almost a year ago.
5) i'm sick of discussing this topic.

IUJHJSDHE · Sep 18, 2002, 07:19 PM

Originally posted by L'enfanTerrible:
[B]

I didn't rat anyone out. This guy ratted people out..

FOR GODS SAKE!!!!!!!!!

IF YOU PEOPLE HAD NOT GONE OUTSIDE THE GUIDELINES I WOULD NOT HAVE HAD ANYONE TO RAT OUT!!!!!

I WAS TOLD TO CHANGE MY SIG THE FIRST TIME I USED AN IMAGE THAT WAS A FEW K OUT OF SIZE!!!!!

I COULD NOT USE MY SIG IMAGE BUT I STILL SAW LIKE 30 OTHER PEOPLE WHO HAD SIGS THAT WERE NOT BEING TOUCHED!!!

I dident think it was fair that my sig was told not to be used but people who post way more me not having any problems with there sig being outside the guidelines.

Remind me to just PM demonhood next time since when I post a thread showing how many peopel where outside the guidelines just gets me disliked.

IUJHJSDHE · Sep 18, 2002, 07:27 PM

Originally posted by L'enfanTerrible:
By the way this guy only ratted out people with cool sigs. Jealous perhaps?

I went to about 5 threads in OS X - General and the Loung and got names at random!!!!!!!

And what would I have to be jealous about?

I would be angry that the mods keeped telling me I could not use the pic I used ages but they were doing nothing about the other people!

ringo · Sep 18, 2002, 08:00 PM

Damn Zimph, I always thought it was a sin to tell a lie. WWJD?

Phanguye · Sep 18, 2002, 09:11 PM

well here is the new one... hope this one works out... otherwise i will be wearing the sig violater tag also

phang

philzilla · Sep 18, 2002, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by ringo:
Damn Zimph, I always thought it was a sin to tell a lie. WWJD?

Miniryu · Sep 19, 2002, 02:28 AM

Originally posted by Zimphire:

I got a message from Demon, my sig was changed before I even read it.

Why wasn't yours?

Nope. My first two posts on this forum were made this morning with an illegal signature. I made probably 5 posts total with an illegal sig since receiving my warning. The thing that bothers me is that Starman is taunting us with blatant abuse of the system.

I say we jump Demon, who is with me? Dude needs to get smacked around a bit.

Miniryu · Sep 19, 2002, 02:42 AM

Originally posted by Zimphire:

I got a message from Demon, my sig was changed before I even read it.

Why wasn't yours?

Nope. My first two posts on this forum were made this morning with an illegal signature. I made probably 5 posts total with an illegal sig since receiving my warning. The thing that bothers me is that Starman is taunting us with blatant abuse of the system.

I say we jump Demon, who is with me? Dude needs to get smacked around a bit.

Subzero Diesel949 · Sep 19, 2002, 03:10 AM

Someone close this drivel, please.

Can you pass around the soapbox while you're at it?

Have a nice day.

Zimphire · 03:17 AM

Originally posted by Demonhood:

hahahahahahahaha. that'd be interesting if it wasn't such a blatant lie.

you were sent your first warning:
09-13-2002 08:42 AM
you changed your sig to something that was smaller, but still in violation.

What it was 4 or 5 pixels off, I was TRYING not to distort it. I didn't think you guys was THAT anal. You know what guidlines are? I had been told by the admins before, as long as it was close, it was ok. As long as it wasn't abused. 140x45 is hardly abusive. Esp when there were other people that had sigs FAR larger than mine, that wasn't said crap to.

you were sent your second warning:
09-16-2002 07:47 PM
and i'm not sure how long after that happened that your sig was changed (wasn't me).

so please, enough with the victim act. you were sent the warnings because i noticed your signature (becuase you post a lot in the lounge). you were sent a second one because you protested and created a NEW sig that was still too big. so you have no room to complain. [/B]

Sorry I do have room to complain. I was givin at most a 2 hour waiting period before my sig was deleted. You know, not ALL of use spend ALL day on the boards. 1 day would not have hurt. Considering there was people with LARGER sigs than me that STILL had them today. There are probably people STILL now with larger sigs.

Yeah lets cut out the singled out part of the whole thing. You really have no excuse for that other than, you singled people out.

Just be a man about it and admit it. Is that so hard?

I swear, some peopel just wont take responsibilities for their actions.

Zimphire · Sep 19, 2002, 03:13 AM

Originally posted by philzilla:
hey Zimph, how big were your Sine ones? were they too big too?

we should ask maxelson to assemble all the children in a circle and read Much Ado About Nothing to them. i never read the thing myself, it just has a fitting title

Yeah I am sure I had larger sigs when I was known as Sine as well. Nothing was said then. And I posted JUST as much. So that was just a lame excuse.

Zimphire · Sep 19, 2002, 03:14 AM

Originally posted by ringo:
Damn Zimph, I always thought it was a sin to tell a lie. WWJD?

What exactly did I lie about? I didn't.

Phanguye · Sep 19, 2002, 10:40 AM

zimphire you used to be known as sine... i always wondered what happened to you... you learn something new every day...

invisibleX · Sep 20, 2002, 01:09 PM

Well, I'm glad to know I've been singled out.

Btw, in a month or so my sig will be growing to about 200x53

invisibleX · Sep 20, 2002, 03:49 PM

In case anyone cares, for some stupid reason my old huge sig is here instead of my new one. Can anyone lend me a tiny bit of web space to host my sig from???

Ca$h68 · Sep 20, 2002, 04:25 PM

Zimph I think a better idea to get the sig guidelines changed would be to stop rationally and logically arguing a sound point, and instead pray to God.

- Ca$h

Zimphire · Sep 20, 2002, 04:30 PM

Originally posted by Ca$h68:
Zimph I think a better idea to get the sig guidelines changed would be to stop rationally and logically arguing a sound point, and instead pray to God.

- Ca$h

Did you come up with that all by yourself?

elzinat · Sep 21, 2002, 01:44 AM

Originally posted by Ca$h68:
Zimph I think a better idea to get the sig guidelines changed would be to stop rationally and logically arguing a sound point, and instead pray to God.

- Ca$h

YOU MUST ERECT A STATUE OF THE DEM0N, AND DEVOTE YOUR EXISTENCE TO THE WORSHIP OF HIM.

Ca$h68 · Sep 21, 2002, 01:06 PM

Originally posted by Zimphire:

Did you come up with that all by yourself?

No, God was with me every key I pressed. He led me through the darkness. Anything I create or produce is purely because of god. Anything I ever do bad, is purely because mankind is evil and horrible.

- Ca$h

Zimphire · Sep 21, 2002, 01:45 PM

Originally posted by Ca$h68:

No, God was with me every key I pressed. He led me through the darkness. Anything I create or produce is purely because of god. Anything I ever do bad, is purely because mankind is evil and horrible.

- Ca$h

Good you finally get it.