Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Rush: Sanford Affair: It's Obama's Fault!

Rush: Sanford Affair: It's Obama's Fault! (Page 3)
Thread Tools
ebuddy
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2009, 12:16 PM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
I use watch his show on TV on a regular basis, before discovering Bill Maher on Politically Incorrect.
I don't believe you. You have zero credibility here.

Discovered what an idiot Rush Limbaugh is.
... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?

He spends most of his show blaming others and complaining about liberals, liberal media, Clinton, immigrants, blacks, gays, and so forth.
Liberals? Yes. Liberal media? Yes. Clinton? Yes. Illegal immigration? Yes. (you superior intellectuals can't seem to separate immigration from illegal immigration.) Blacks? Uh... no. I have no idea what you're talking about. I have a hunch the numerous blacks who contribute to his program including fill-in hosts and the screener might have a problem with this. Gays? No. A Gay Agenda? Yes.

He's a drug addict who can't maintain his own marriage and divorce multiple times.
He is? Have you not renewed your subscription to the Daily Kos since 2003?

He is a fat head with a fat body who only cares out getting fat, taking drugs, and making money.
Actually, he's lost quite a lot of weight in the past 8-10 months and it looks like it might be collecting on Al Gore. Is being fat somehow reprehensible now? There's a great many fat-a$$ed commie libs relying on your support.

He travels to Asia with packs of Viagra.
I'm sure you've gotten this wrong. The bumper sticker wasn't large enough I'm guessing.

He symbolizes greed, gluttony, sloth, wrath, lust, and pride.
How do these things not represent you? I laughed at the wrath thing though. That's rich.

The WRATH of RUSH!!!
ebuddy
     
Chongo
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2009, 12:44 PM
 
Originally Posted by stupendousman View Post
Again, if that's the best the people of his district have to offer, that's a sad commentary on the people of district. To suggest that they can't have good representation without going to a corrupt, pathological liar simply is laughable.
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak View Post
Again, that's *exactly* what the rest of the world thought when you re-elected Bill Clinton.
Fixed
45/47
     
Wiskedjak
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2009, 01:47 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chongo View Post
Fixed
Yep. Point being, from the other side of the fence, it's always difficult to understand why someone chooses to elect someone you disagree with.
     
screener
Senior User
Join Date: May 2009
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 4, 2009, 02:25 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chongo View Post
Fixed
To funny.
Clinton is popular just about everywhere and Bush is reviled just about everywhere.

The right wingnuts really do live in a strange reality.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 04:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post
I don't believe you. You have zero credibility here.
I just checked my credibility level here. It's higher than yours.

Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post
... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?
Don't tell me, you have a degree in idiocy? I can't have an opinion now? Yes, Rush Limbaugh is an idiot. A big fat idiot.

Google "Rush Idiot"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

There's even a book titled "Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot" written by the new US Senator Al Franken.

http://www.amazon.com/Rush-Limbaugh-.../dp/0440508649

Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post
Liberals? Yes. Liberal media? Yes. Clinton? Yes. Illegal immigration? Yes. (you superior intellectuals can't seem to separate immigration from illegal immigration.) Blacks? Uh... no. I have no idea what you're talking about. I have a hunch the numerous blacks who contribute to his program including fill-in hosts and the screener might have a problem with this. Gays? No. A Gay Agenda? Yes.


He is? Have you not renewed your subscription to the Daily Kos since 2003?
I watched more of Rush Limbaugh's TV show than I'm been on Daily Kos website. I think I've visited Daily Kos about maybe a dozen times.


Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post

Actually, he's lost quite a lot of weight in the past 8-10 months and it looks like it might be collecting on Al Gore. Is being fat somehow reprehensible now? There's a great many fat-a$$ed commie libs relying on your support.


I'm sure you've gotten this wrong. The bumper sticker wasn't large enough I'm guessing.
What? That he travels overseas with Viagra? Don't you know, you are a Rush fan. He's fat and get his penis up unless he has Viagra.

Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post

How do these things not represent you? I laughed at the wrath thing though. That's rich.

The WRATH of RUSH!!!
Yeah, Rush is an angry angry man. He's angry on every show. Bunch is pussy Republicans have to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after suffering his wrath.
( Last edited by hyteckit; Jul 5, 2009 at 05:01 AM. )
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 05:14 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
I just checked my credibility level here. It's higher than yours.
I also enjoy the smell of my own farts.


Don't tell me, you have a degree in idiocy? I can't have an opinion now? Yes, Rush Limbaugh is an idiot. A big fat idiot.
You have an opinion that you state over and over and over as fact, much like a child with your hands over your ears. No one asks you to change your opinion, just understand that the world doesn't revolve around it. Maybe then others could understand it too.



What? That he travels overseas with Viagra? Don't you know, you are a Rush fan. He's fat and get his penis up unless he has Viagra.
For a liberal you really suck at being politically correct. Whats wrong with fat people? And what's with your obsession with Rush Limbaugh's penis? You can't seriously be talking about your credibility in one sentence and a talk show host's penis in the next?

Yeah, Rush is an angry angry man. He's angry on every show. Bunch is pussy Republicans have to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after suffering his wrath.
No one apologizes for rush, much in the same way no one here apologizes for you.


I would enjoy your posts alot more if you had anything substantial in them to support your views. Sometimes you almost get there but quickly flush that down the toilet. I'd really enjoy hearing the logic behind your statements...but over and over you offer none and in its place talk about viagra and rush getting his penis up. Hardly important for the issues at hand, would you not agree?
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 05:32 AM
 
Anyone else feel a few brain cells die after reading this thread?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
ebuddy
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 09:28 AM
 
hyteckit calls Rush Limbaugh an idiot:

Originally Posted by hyteckit
I watched more of Rush Limbaugh's TV show than I'm been on Daily Kos website.
Originally Posted by hyteckit
He's fat and get his penis up unless he has Viagra.
Originally Posted by hyteckit
Yeah, Rush is an angry angry man.
I was thinking why not go all the way with this one. You know... something like; "Rush is an angry angry angry angry man."

Originally Posted by hyteckit
Bunch is pussy Republicans have to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after suffering his wrath.
Let me see if I got this... Bunch is pussy Republicans...
Nope... still doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

Congrats hyteckit, you now have less than zero credibility here.
Friggin' priceless.
ebuddy
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 04:02 PM
 
is => of

Unless you want me to do a screed on what all the misused punctuation and questionable grammar in your post says about your intellectual (and possibly sexual) prowess, perhaps you should be a little bit less cruel with regards to others' English errors.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 05:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post
I also enjoy the smell of my own farts.
I suggest that you stop sniffing your ass? But I guess if you enjoy it, please continue.

Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post
You have an opinion that you state over and over and over as fact, much like a child with your hands over your ears. No one asks you to change your opinion, just understand that the world doesn't revolve around it. Maybe then others could understand it too.





For a liberal you really suck at being politically correct. Whats wrong with fat people? And what's with your obsession with Rush Limbaugh's penis? You can't seriously be talking about your credibility in one sentence and a talk show host's penis in the next?
I don't know. Republicans were and still are quite obsessed with Clinton's penis.

Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post

No one apologizes for rush, much in the same way no one here apologizes for you.
Apologize for Rush? No, I said apologize to Rush. Big difference in meaning.

Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post

I would enjoy your posts alot more if you had anything substantial in them to support your views. Sometimes you almost get there but quickly flush that down the toilet. I'd really enjoy hearing the logic behind your statements...but over and over you offer none and in its place talk about viagra and rush getting his penis up. Hardly important for the issues at hand, would you not agree?
From a guy who doesn't know the difference between "apologize to Rush" and "apologize for Rush".
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 05:56 PM
 
Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post

Let me see if I got this... Bunch is pussy Republicans...
Nope... still doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
Yeah, pussy Republicans. Republicans who are a bunch of pussies because they don't have the guts to stand up for what they've said about Rush.

Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post

Congrats hyteckit, you now have less than zero credibility here.
Friggin' priceless.
Reply form ebuddy:

... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?


( Last edited by hyteckit; Jul 5, 2009 at 06:03 PM. )
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
ebuddy
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 5, 2009, 11:38 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
is => of

Unless you want me to do a screed on what all the misused punctuation and questionable grammar in your post says about your intellectual (and possibly sexual) prowess, perhaps you should be a little bit less cruel with regards to others' English errors.
I'd of course welcome you to find any post of mine that comes even close to the incoherent mess I responded to. I appreciate your attempt at fairness, but the irony of him calling someone else an idiot was apparently lost on you. I think my response to him was not only fair, but wholly warranted. I also don't see how my response to him suggests anything of my sexual prowess nor do I think it'd behoove a moderator to start challenging forum rules.

BTW, it goes way beyond grammatical errors Chuckit.
ebuddy
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 01:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Yeah, pussy Republicans. Republicans who are a bunch of pussies because they don't have the guts to stand up for what they've said about Rush.
Really? How can you take yourself seriously...or expect anyone else here to?




... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?


Because ebuddy has demonstrated time and again that he's competent to provide meaningful arguments and productive responses towards thought-worthy discourse.

You do the same....just on a much smaller percentage of your posts.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 02:38 AM
 
Originally Posted by ebuddy View Post
I'd of course welcome you to find any post of mine that comes even close to the incoherent mess I responded to. I appreciate your attempt at fairness, but the irony of him calling someone else an idiot was apparently lost on you. I think my response to him was not only fair, but wholly warranted. I also don't see how my response to him suggests anything of my sexual prowess nor do I think it'd behoove a moderator to start challenging forum rules.

BTW, it goes way beyond grammatical errors Chuckit.
I don't know what to tell you ebuddy. This thread is filled with a bunch of ramblings and incomplete sentences from both you and me.

I do random edits to my post and don't necessary correct every word. Yes, there are typos and grammatical errors.

Chuckit has the intelligence to figure out that "is => of". Yet you can't figure that out ebuddy?

If you can't make sense of "Bunch is pussy Republicans", that reflects on your intelligence, not mine.

Even a 2nd grader can figure out that "is => of" if s/he were to correct the sentence. Why can't you ebuddy?
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 02:59 AM
 
Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post
Really? How can you take yourself seriously...or expect anyone else here to?

Because ebuddy has demonstrated time and again that he's competent to provide meaningful arguments and productive responses towards thought-worthy discourse.

You do the same....just on a much smaller percentage of your posts.
Meaningful arguments? Really? I disagree.

I haven't read a single meaningful argument from him in this thread.

Here's a summary of ebuddy's argument after I call Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Me: Rush is an angry idiot
ebuddy: Have you ever listen to his show?
Me: I have seen many of Rush's TV show before discovering Political Incorrect
ebuddy: I don't believe you, you have no zero credibility here. What's your expertise in critiquing Rush's intellect
Me: It's my opinion that Rush is an idiot. I don't I need a degree to have an opinion.
ebuddy: Oh yeah, "Bunch is pussy Republicans" doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
Me: Well, I'm sure even a 2nd grader has the intelligence to figure out what that meant and what I intended to say.


ebuddy sounds like a teenager trying to win an argument without substance.

I don't believe you. You don't know nothing. Oh yeah, your breath stinks.
( Last edited by hyteckit; Jul 6, 2009 at 03:08 AM. )
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 03:32 AM
 
Search for "Big Fat Idiot" on google and who do you get?

Rush Limbaugh.

big fat idiot - Google Search

Wow, 9 out of the 10 results on the 1st page. Rush Limbaugh pretty much dominates in the Google search results for the search term "Big Fat Idiot".
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 03:49 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Search for "Big Fat Idiot" on google and who do you get?

Rush Limbaugh.

big fat idiot - Google Search

Wow, 9 out of the 10 results on the 1st page. Rush Limbaugh pretty much dominates in the Google search results for the search term "Big Fat Idiot".
Uhm, because it's a book, written by a complete non-partisan, Al Franken.
Pretty much anytime you enter a book title in Google, it will dominate the hits.

So, who looks stupid now ?

-t
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 06:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Search for "Big Fat Idiot" on google and who do you get?

Rush Limbaugh.

big fat idiot - Google Search

Wow, 9 out of the 10 results on the 1st page. Rush Limbaugh pretty much dominates in the Google search results for the search term "Big Fat Idiot".
Don't you have better things to do with your time and conversely, waste ours with? What does this have to do with anything? And are you really trying to make your ideals look valid? Should I even bring up credibility again?
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 06:55 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Meaningful arguments? Really? I disagree.

I haven't read a single meaningful argument from him in this thread.

Here's a summary of ebuddy's argument after I call Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Me: Rush is an angry idiot
ebuddy: Have you ever listen to his show?
Me: I have seen many of Rush's TV show before discovering Political Incorrect
ebuddy: I don't believe you, you have no zero credibility here. What's your expertise in critiquing Rush's intellect
Me: It's my opinion that Rush is an idiot. I don't I need a degree to have an opinion.
ebuddy: Oh yeah, "Bunch is pussy Republicans" doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
Me: Well, I'm sure even a 2nd grader has the intelligence to figure out what that meant and what I intended to say.


ebuddy sounds like a teenager trying to win an argument without substance.

I don't believe you. You don't know nothing. Oh yeah, your breath stinks.
Your whole premise is not in the least bit meaningful. "Rush is an idiot" is not relevant or meaningful in any way. Now, if you have specific examples to validate that statement which are relevant than thats a whole 'nother story. Thats what you were asked to present.

Instead you spoke of viagra and limbaugh's penis, then went on about how credible you are as a source.


If you had something substantial -more than useless political drivel, attacks, and name-calling- than I would LOVE to engage you in an actual, productive, discussion on the state of everything right now. Until then I can't help but agree with ebuddy. You haven't presented anything of substance otherwise.

I could go through and pick out the arguments that were insightful and well-crafted, if you would like, from ebuddy as well as you.

I'll reiterate a previous post of mine...you are capable of making well presented and supported arguments, but often you choose a path like this thread instead. I'd just like to get some meaningful discussion out of you. I've enjoyed watching you and ebuddy present arguments in many other threads. Though sometimes the both of you get too personal with it, nonetheless you both offer something to think about. I see none of that in this thread.
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 11:31 AM
 
Talk about putting his hooks in people. hyteckit is the one who needs a radio show.
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 11:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by subego View Post
Talk about putting his hooks in people. hyteckit is the one who needs a radio show.
Really ?

In hyteckit's case, I would just call it trolling, and leave it at that.

-t
     
subego
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 6, 2009, 11:51 AM
 
Originally Posted by turtle777 View Post
In hyteckit's case, I would just call it trolling

     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 7, 2009, 02:30 AM
 
Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post
Your whole premise is not in the least bit meaningful. "Rush is an idiot" is not relevant or meaningful in any way. Now, if you have specific examples to validate that statement which are relevant than thats a whole 'nother story. Thats what you were asked to present.

Instead you spoke of viagra and limbaugh's penis, then went on about how credible you are as a source.

How is calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot not relevant to this thread?

This whole thread is about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot.

I'm not just randomly jumping into different threads calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Example?

How about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot for blaming Obama for Sanford's affair.

See. Very relevant to the thread.
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 7, 2009, 07:08 PM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
How is calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot not relevant to this thread?

This whole thread is about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot.

I'm not just randomly jumping into different threads calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Example?

How about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot for blaming Obama for Sanford's affair.

See. Very relevant to the thread.

Right...

You are certainly entitled to voice your opinion about rush. No one is arguing that. I guess we can just wrap this one up then.

Hyteckit thinks rush is an idiot. Case closed. Great!
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 7, 2009, 11:45 PM
 
Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post
Right...

You are certainly entitled to voice your opinion about rush. No one is arguing that. I guess we can just wrap this one up then.

Hyteckit thinks rush is an idiot. Case closed. Great!
Yup. That's pretty much it to this thread.

There are those who think Rush is an idiot for believing Sanford's Affair is Obama's fault.

Then there are others who do not think Rush is an idiot, and Rush doesn't really believe Sanford's affair Obama's fault. It was only a "hook" and not to be taken seriously.

Then there are the small minority who agrees with Rush and believe Sanford's affair is Obama's fault.
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
CRASH HARDDRIVE
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 7, 2009, 11:59 PM
 
Then there are those of us who believe it's impossible that you're older than 14.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2009, 12:15 AM
 
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE View Post
Then there are those of us who believe it's impossible that you're older than 14.
If I'm 14, then you must be like 5?
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2009, 12:39 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
Yup. That's pretty much it to this thread.

There are those who think Rush is an idiot for believing Sanford's Affair is Obama's fault.

Then there are others who do not think Rush is an idiot, and Rush doesn't really believe Sanford's affair Obama's fault. It was only a "hook" and not to be taken seriously.

Then there are the small minority who agrees with Rush and believe Sanford's affair is Obama's fault.
So essentially you've wasted everyone's time here. Not interested in any discussion, just childish name calling for a political commentator? What was it you said about credibility earlier?

How can you expect anyone to take you seriously? How can you expect to persuade people when this is the example you set. If this is what comes of your ideals, then you're doing nothing but further entrenching those with differing ideals into their place...as your credibility as a mature and productive member of our society wanes. The circle continues, and the lines of communication between differing ideologies become cut.
     
hyteckit
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2009, 02:16 AM
 
Originally Posted by Snow-i View Post
So essentially you've wasted everyone's time here. Not interested in any discussion, just childish name calling for a political commentator? What was it you said about credibility earlier?

How can you expect anyone to take you seriously? How can you expect to persuade people when this is the example you set. If this is what comes of your ideals, then you're doing nothing but further entrenching those with differing ideals into their place...as your credibility as a mature and productive member of our society wanes. The circle continues, and the lines of communication between differing ideologies become cut.
The discussion was about whether Rush is an idiot. You can agree or disagree and argue your point. Or just provide your opinion.

I've provide my opinion and attempted to argue my point.

This thread is not suppose to be about my credibility, my age, my grammar, or my expertise, so why have a childish discussion about it?

I didn't start the thread, erik did. I don't know how you accuses me of wasting everyone's time. ebuddy, CRASH HARDDRIVE, and you are wasting everyone's time by attacking me and not talk about the subject in this thread.

Challenge the arguments, not attacking the person making the arguments.
( Last edited by hyteckit; Jul 8, 2009 at 02:25 AM. )
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
     
Snow-i
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2009, 05:55 AM
 
Originally Posted by hyteckit View Post
The discussion was about whether Rush is an idiot. You can agree or disagree and argue your point. Or just provide your opinion.
You didn't want to discuss anything. I had several posts with arguments and support for them, of which you failed to adequately address a single one.
I've provide my opinion and attempted to argue my point.
If by argue you mean repeat yourself over and over with zero elaboration, then yes, yes you did.
This thread is not suppose to be about my credibility, my age, my grammar, or my expertise, so why have a childish discussion about it?
It comes into question when you make statements about it. You brought it up. Not me.

I didn't start the thread, erik did. I don't know how you accuses me of wasting everyone's time. ebuddy, CRASH HARDDRIVE, and you are wasting everyone's time by attacking me and not talk about the subject in this thread.
We've done nothing but talk about the topic, and all you've done is talk about rush's penis, viagra, and numerous other non-points. You haven't discussed or supported any of your statements, and made ridiculous accusations founded in pure, petty hatred for an entertainer. I'll give you quotes on what I mean if you so wish for me to compile a list and actually support my statements.

Challenge the arguments, not attacking the person making the arguments.
Hellooooooo thats all we did. We're "attacking you" for not supporting your arguments and making ridiculous statements. Don't say something if you're unwilling or unable to back it up. You open yourself up to well-founded criticism for doing so.
     
- - e r i k - -  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2009, 08:32 PM
 
This has to be the first time I've unsubscribed to my own thread. Way to go guys!

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
CRASH HARDDRIVE
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 8, 2009, 11:35 PM
 
     
 
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,