Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > Can booting of a CF card extend battery life?

Can booting of a CF card extend battery life?
Thread Tools
waffffffle
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 24, 2005, 04:09 PM
 
Has anyone ever tried booting their Mac off of a Compact Flash card via a PCMCIA card reader? I know that this was possible back in OS 9 on older PowerBooks. I'm interested in it now for the purposes of extended battery life. Now that 2 GB CF cards are available and prices are falling, it seems like a cool thing to try.

Currently I only have a 128 MB card and a USB adapter, so I would need to buy some gear to test this out, but I am intrigued. Is it possible just to put the swap partition on the card? Would that increase performance or battery life?
     
Eriamjh
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 26, 2005, 08:19 AM
 
I used to run a RAM disk in OS9 on my Pismo and it significantly boosted battery life. You have to put all your apps and files on it so it doesn't spin up the HD.

Until you get a CF card big enough to hold a startup disk, you won't know will you (unless someone else reports you can).

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Taloston Man
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Toronto, ON
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 26, 2005, 10:04 AM
 
I suspect that things would also be Incredibly Slow.
Trevor Haldenby
www.ExposedBrain.com/trevor
MacBook 2.0 GHz / 2 gigs RAM | 60GB vidiPod, Shuffle
     
Phiber
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 26, 2005, 12:28 PM
 
Why would it be slow? If it were flash memory as opposed to Mini HD's, the flash memory will transfer data a lot quicker than your HD.
01110011011011100110111101110111011000110111001001 1000010111001101101000
     
johnpop
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dallas, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 26, 2005, 01:58 PM
 
Originally posted by Phiber:
Why would it be slow? If it were flash memory as opposed to Mini HD's, the flash memory will transfer data a lot quicker than your HD.
Might want to google that..
     
jamil5454
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Downtown Austin, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 26, 2005, 03:00 PM
 
Flash memory, especially its access speeds, are wwaaayyyy slower than even the slowest notebook HD.
     
Phiber
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 26, 2005, 04:44 PM
 
Interesting. I stand corrected.
01110011011011100110111101110111011000110111001001 1000010111001101101000
     
ddma
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Hong Kong
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 28, 2005, 11:32 PM
 
I think for Mac OS 9, the slow speed is acceptable. But come to Mac OS X... and using your boot disk as virtual memory... forget it.
The stupidest user.
.ddma.SAY - http://www.didierma.com
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:48 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,