|
|
Why do I want an L3 Cache?
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have one, what function does it serve? What if I had a L1 and L2, why is this L3 better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Here and there
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's not better or worse, it's simply another level of cache the microprocessor can keep data and program code in before he has to access the way slower memory.
|
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one
pretty and well preserved piece, but to skid across the line broadside,
thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, shouting GERONIMO!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by D'Espice:
It's not better or worse, it's simply another level of cache the microprocessor can keep data and program code in before he has to access the way slower memory.
WOW. that's REALLY sexist.
|
Michael Simon, Executive Editor
Collar and Carapace Press
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
It would only be apparent when your processor is chugging down a lot of info, like rendering and PS and the like.
For most normal use a super fast L2 is all you need. Which luckily my G4 has, but in PS and other CPU - intensive programs it tends to slow down noticably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Hi I'm Ben:
I have one, what function does it serve? What if I had a L1 and L2, why is this L3 better?
By the way, you definitely have an L1 and L2 cache as well. The L1 and L2 caches are on the actual G4 chip. The L3 cache is on the CPU daughtercard.
|
Mac Pro Dual 3.0 Dual-Core
MacBook Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Leonard:
By the way, you definitely have an L1 and L2 cache as well. The L1 and L2 caches are on the actual G4 chip. The L3 cache is on the CPU daughtercard.
That's also sexist
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Here and there
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by morlium:
WOW. that's REALLY sexist.
Errr... DANG you're right. I wanted to write something else first and apparantly forgot to edit the he
PS: My microprocessor is male, HA!
|
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one
pretty and well preserved piece, but to skid across the line broadside,
thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, shouting GERONIMO!"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Maine
Status:
Offline
|
|
too bad its smaller then my processor
|
I GOT WASTED WITH PHIL SHERRY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think this was from a reader comment on Slashdot, but I'm not sure. Maybe it'll clear things up.
'He' is the singular indefinite pronoun in English ("if a person drinks too much, he will likely experience a hangover"); 'He' also happens to be the masculine personal pronoun.
'She' is the singular pronoun of personification in English ("if England fails to advance America's foreign-policy ambitions, she will suffer terrible consequences"); 'She' also happens to be the feminine personal pronoun.
Confusing the two exhibits not a warm-and-fuzzy concern for the inclusion of women so much as a writer's or speaker's ignorance. Using the feminine personal pronoun as an indefinite article is as moronic as using the masculine personal pronoun for personification. Thus the captain greets us: "Welcome to my ship. Isn't he splendid?"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The presence of a L3 cache makes a big difference in performance. Without a L3 cache, the G4/800 upgrade I tested felt no faster than the stock G4/500. With a L3 cache, it felt noticeable faster. In my games tests, the difference was about 30%.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you want to test it, download the developer tools (from developer.apple.com) and install the CHUD tools. Then go to System Preferences and use the new CPU preference to turn off the L3 cache temporarily (and/or the L2 cache and second processor). Try running XBench with it on and off.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver,BC,Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm caring less and less about cache and all things G4 related... I just got an Athlon XP 2400 and it is, on average, 4x faster at rendering, and workflow tasks than my QS DP 1GHz... pretty depressing since it cost about 1/5th the price. Apple needs the 970 YESTERDAY!
|
Cheers,
raferx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: bethesda, Md. 20816
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Hi I'm Ben:
I have one, what function does it serve? What if I had a L1 and L2, why is this L3 better?
Actually you have a Cube, right??????? I had one and it's a very decent machine with 1 meg. of L2 cache. L3 is supposed to be faster. You could if you wanted to, put in an upgraded single or dual processor card that would obviously be way faster than what you have. Someone chime in here with the companies that make these cards. I only know of Powerlogix but, I know there are more of them. However, these cards are expensive at well at least over $500.00 or so. They would have the L3 cache and of course your Cube would be a new machine with one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by raferx:
I'm caring less and less about cache and all things G4 related... I just got an Athlon XP 2400 and it is, on average, 4x faster at rendering, and workflow tasks than my QS DP 1GHz... pretty depressing since it cost about 1/5th the price. Apple needs the 970 YESTERDAY!
thanks for your worthless post. I have a PC. I'm aware it's faster then my mac and will continue to be faster then my mac. That's the reason I bought it. I don't care about your Athlon 2400 and how much money you saved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Vancouver,BC,Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Hi I'm Ben:
thanks for your worthless post. I have a PC. I'm aware it's faster then my mac and will continue to be faster then my mac. That's the reason I bought it. I don't care about your Athlon 2400 and how much money you saved.
Yawn... wow a snappy answer!
Enjoy your G4 Cube 1.2ghz / 1 GB RAM / 64 MB GeForce 3 / 80 GB WD 8 MB Cache / 40 GB WD 7200rpm in F.W. Enclosure/ 12x CD-RW F.W. / 8x DVD / iBot / iMic/ iSub / Pro Apple Speakers / 17" CRT Apple Studio Display
and read this maybe?
http://216.239.57.100/search?q=cache...hl=en&ie=UTF-8
(
Last edited by raferx; Feb 26, 2003 at 04:36 AM.
)
|
Cheers,
raferx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|