Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Hardware - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Mac Notebooks > Powerpc processors

Powerpc processors
Thread Tools
tomzo22
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2007, 01:21 PM
 
At the moment i have an AMD 3000 2.0ghz processor. Am i right in thinking that a 1.67 powerpc processor is equivalent to this speed? Or can you directly compare the processor speeds?
     
drpepper
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Oct 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2007, 01:46 PM
 
You can probably find benchmarks to say anything you want to hear. My personal observations and casual comparisons (not thorough tests) were that the G4s I had (667MHz and 1.33GHz) compared to what I'd expect from a P4 of about the same clock speed, maybe a little faster.

If the "3000" in the AMD name is that loose P4 scale they were using, a 3GHz P4 would be considerably faster than a 1.67GHz G4, so an AMD "3000" would be too.
     
tinkered
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Oakland, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2007, 01:54 PM
 
The AMD is newer and faster. That said I would suspect that difference isn't so over whelming that other factors in you computer may cause these to bench similarly on some tests.
17" MBP C2D 2.33/3 GB RAM/500 GB 7200 rpm/Glossy Display|-|
17" iMac CD|-|15" PB G4 1.25 GHz|-|iBook g4 1Ghz|-|Pismo
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2007, 05:52 PM
 
Because the AMD processor and the PPC processor work differently and different OSs run on them, you can't compare them directly. What you need is cross platform benchmarks, which are notably absent from most discussions. However, you can compare identical functions of equivalent products, such as Office:Mac and Office XP. One might open the same very large document on both platforms do the same search and replace and time the operation.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
peeb
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2007, 07:09 PM
 
Yes, you can't directly compare the speeds. What do you want to do? Differences in usability account for a lot of the perception of speed and ease of use in everyday tasks too.
     
mduell
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 9, 2007, 07:40 PM
 
SystemShootouts, a generally pro-Mac site, says the Athlon 3000+ is about the same as a 3Ghz P4 and the 1.67Ghz G4 is about the same as a 2.2GHz P4, based on the average of a variety of benchmarks.

There are, of course, some outliers. I can think of a benchmark where a 1.67Ghz G4 would match a (theoretical) 9Ghz P4, and I'm sure there are some the other way around.
     
bloodline
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Not far from a shop that sells Logic Pro
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 13, 2007, 07:32 AM
 
When running logic pro, I found that my 2.0Ghz Athlon64 (3200+)... let's not question how I managed to run Logic Pro on an Athlon... I found it about as fast as a 2Ghz G5 iMac... My new MBP is MUCH faster than either machine.
2.8 Ghz Unibody MacBook Pro 15" - 4GB Ram - Logic Pro 8.0
2.33 Ghz C2D MacBook Pro 15" - 3GB Ram - Logic Pro 7.2
1.5 Ghz G4 PowerBook 12" - 1.25GB Ram
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:09 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,