[The Final Dakar]

For "enhanced protection of the health and safety of the public".

On a phone so you've dodged a reaction gif.

[OreoCookie]

I heard that this is even the case if the woman has a miscarriage, something that has nothing to do with abortions. That's really despicable, if you know people who have had miscarriages, you know how hard that alone hits them. Forcing them to give burials is just unnecessarily rubbing salt in their wounds.

[The Final Dakar]

Originally Posted by OreoCookie 

I heard that this is even the case if the woman has a miscarriage, something that has nothing to do with abortions. That's really despicable, if you know people who have had miscarriages, you know how hard that alone hits them. Forcing them to give burials is just unnecessarily rubbing salt in their wounds.

Interestingly, there's an exception for miscarriages. One wonders why something enacted for health reasons would have this exception.

[reader50]

Is there an exception when rape was involved? If not, who gets billed?

[andi*pandi]

Hey texas: the first person to get stem cell therapy has recovered use of their upper body.

First Ever Quadriplegic Treated With Stem Cells Regains Motor Control in His Upper Body - Good News Network

[Waragainstsleep]

Only Texan politicians could look at this law in Indiana and think: "Hey, what a great idea!"

[subego]

Looking over a few articles, this sounds like much less of a big deal than it's being made out to be. I don't even see a likely vector for someone who has an abortion/miscarriage to even be aware this is happening other than reading it in the news.

Part of me thinks the point of legislation like this is to draw fire with the intent of making the opponent look uncompromising.

[The Final Dakar]

Originally Posted by subego 

Looking over a few articles, this sounds like much less of a big deal than it's being made out to be. I don't even see a likely vector for someone who has an abortion/miscarriage to even be aware this is happening other than reading it in the news.

Part of me thinks the point of legislation like this is to draw fire with the intent of making the opponent look uncompromising.

Isn't this a regulation designed to increase costs at the very least?

[Laminar]

Originally Posted by The Final Dakar 

Interestingly, there's an exception for miscarriages. One wonders why something enacted for health reasons would have this exception.

I'd imagine as miscarriages can happen at inopportune moments, they don't want to prosecute anyone that didn't recover remains from their bathroom at work.

[Laminar]

Originally Posted by The Final Dakar 

Isn't this a regulation designed to increase costs at the very least?

In Iowa, a local funeral home collects fetal remains and when they have enough, perform a memorial ceremony over all of them and then cremates all of the the remains at no cost to the parents. This requires only signing a consent form and nothing after that.

Parents also have the option of retaining the remains for burial or individual cremation.

This obviously has nothing to do with health or safety, but is a stair step toward reducing abortion rights. "The law has determined that a 3 week old fetus must be treated as a human, therefore it's a human, therefore abortion is murder."

[subego]

The SCOTUS will kick you off the stairs for trying to step there, unless RvW gets flipped, and then you don't need the stairs.

[subego]

Originally Posted by The Final Dakar 

Interestingly, there's an exception for miscarriages. One wonders why something enacted for health reasons would have this exception.

IIUC, the law applies to hospital/clinic procedures.

So, it applies to miscarriages if they happen in a hospital or clinic.