Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > macOS > OS X 10.4 UI changes

OS X 10.4 UI changes
Thread Tools
dashiel
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 01:45 AM
 
so i've noticed that the iApps released in the early part of the year tend to foreshadow UI changes to the OS that appears later that year (not saying 10.4 will be out this year).

it seems most iApps have no major visual changes to the UI, but garageband brings up some interesting concepts.

1) obvisouly the most noticeable thing is the "dark side" brushed metal look of the app itself, plus the weird wood grain sides. not sure about the wood bit, but the dark brushed metal is kind of interesting, would have been perfect for panther.

2) if you look at
this page the close up of the app shows aqua shaped buttons, but without the trademark aqua render. i like this one myself. sometimes aqua can be too much in those small pallete windows.

thats all i caught anyone else?
     
lookmark
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: NYC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 03:59 AM
 
GarageBand is clearly doing it's own 'tang UI-wise, but I think you're absolutely right that iApps (or any new apps, really) often predict OS X UI directions.

Here's my observations:

- an increasing usage of flatter widgets, and widgets with rounded corners to indicate that they're active objects

- an increasing comfort with darker interfaces (digital pro apps, GarageBand, brushed metal)

- Smart Everything...
     
Developer
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 04:25 AM
 
Increasing use whatever you want and think looks cool is the direction of the future.
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
     
moonmonkey
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 08:13 AM
 
Originally posted by dashiel:
so i've noticed that the iApps released in the early part of the year tend to foreshadow UI changes to the OS that appears later that year (not saying 10.4 will be out this year).

it seems most iApps have no major visual changes to the UI, but garageband brings up some interesting concepts.

1) obvisouly the most noticeable thing is the "dark side" brushed metal look of the app itself, plus the weird wood grain sides. not sure about the wood bit, but the dark brushed metal is kind of interesting, would have been perfect for panther.

2) if you look at
this page the close up of the app shows aqua shaped buttons, but without the trademark aqua render. i like this one myself. sometimes aqua can be too much in those small pallete windows.

thats all i caught anyone else?

Apple are going that way on the website too.
I think its a good idea, I much prefer it.

I just wish they would do it all at once, not bit by bit.
     
Maflynn
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 08:35 AM
 
I think its way too early to say what the UI will look like in 10.4, Panther is just a few months old.

Mike
     
Eriamjh
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: BFE
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 08:46 AM
 
I heard 10.4 is going to look gold plated.

"Well... not really. I can't back that up." - Dr. Evil

I'm a bird. I am the 1% (of pets).
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 09:18 AM
 
GarageBand's UI is modeled after real-life sound mixing boards. That's why it's darker and has the wood on the sides; this appears to be some kind of convention with the makers of such devices. I wouldn't consider it a real indicator of where the UI is going.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
TheSpaz
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 09:22 AM
 
Here's my thoughts on GarageBand. Apple is just trying to them that ONE App to look like what the APP actually functions as. It's a music App. That doesn't mean Apple is going to make OS X all wooden and stuff.

Also, those NEW rendered widgets that people are talking about is WRONG. The screenshot that you have seen is a PROMO screenshot (it's actually a high resolution render of a screenshot made for Print and stuff). Ever look at the HUGE posters on the wall at the Apple Stores? Check out the GUI on those... very very similar at first glance... but as you look a little harder... you'll start to notice that it's not a real screenshot because if you make a screenshot that big... you're just gonna see a lot of Jaggedness and pixels.

I don't think this is a pro App, so I think that's why they didn't give it a pro interface. It has that cartoony OS X kinda interface.

That's all I gotta say. Thanks
     
TheSpaz
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 09:47 AM
 
See the HIGH RESOLUTION images here.

http://www.apple.com/pr/photos/ilife/ilife04.html

These photos and MOCK-UPs are for high quality print and other media. They are not real screenshots... try downloading them and look at them at 100%
     
Developer
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: europe
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 10:35 AM
 
Originally posted by Millennium:
GarageBand's UI is modeled after real-life sound mixing boards.
We can only hope that Apple will never model iTunes after the iPod and replace the scrollbars with a scroll wheel.
Nasrudin sat on a river bank when someone shouted to him from the opposite side: "Hey! how do I get across?" "You are across!" Nasrudin shouted back.
     
Immortal K-Mart Employee
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Folding customer returned size 52 underwear.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 7, 2004, 01:16 PM
 
Final Cut Pro has had a different dark look since the OS9 days and it has not influencing the rest of the UI.

{v2.3 Now Jesus free}
Religions are like farts: yours is good, the others always stink.
     
dashiel  (op)
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 8, 2004, 09:37 PM
 
Originally posted by Immortal K-Mart Employee:
Final Cut Pro has had a different dark look since the OS9 days and it has not influencing the rest of the UI.
i know, i used FCP back on OS9, but imovie3/itunes4 both of which came out before panther had the flatter aqua widgets that are now in panther. the same can be said of the embeded window widgets.

looking at the imovie "about screen" posted here you can see that the title bar has a different look to the current panther. it's looks glossier. the red window widget looks darker, but that could simply be jpeg compression.

-- edit
actuall now that i look closer i think it's just that the window is inactive and an active window behind it is causing the effect
     
CatOne
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 8, 2004, 10:02 PM
 
Originally posted by dashiel:
i know, i used FCP back on OS9, but imovie3/itunes4 both of which came out before panther had the flatter aqua widgets that are now in panther. the same can be said of the embeded window widgets.

looking at the imovie "about screen" posted here you can see that the title bar has a different look to the current panther. it's looks glossier. the red window widget looks darker, but that could simply be jpeg compression.

-- edit
actuall now that i look closer i think it's just that the window is inactive and an active window behind it is causing the effect
Well, I think it may be because GarageBand looks to be a slight retooling of Soundtrack, which is a Pro App. The Pro Apps (Final Cut Pro, DVD Studio Pro, Shake) all have the "dark" look. And if you've used Soundtrack, much of GarageBand will be VERY familiar
     
andreas_g4
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: adequate, thanks.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2004, 11:01 AM
 
Originally posted by TheSpaz:
See the HIGH RESOLUTION images here.

http://www.apple.com/pr/photos/ilife/ilife04.html

These photos and MOCK-UPs are for high quality print and other media. They are not real screenshots... try downloading them and look at them at 100%


As you can see here, the Apple "screenshots" (at least this one) have an resolution of 288 dpi, which is 72 x 4. If it was a complete mock-up, wouldn't it rather be 300 dpi?
I have no clue how those images are made, but it seems for me as they are just using the original UI data, rendered four times the usual resolution. What du you think?
     
movabi
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Iowa City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2004, 03:21 PM
 
I would rather Apple concentrate on making the finder and othe system services faster and more reliable. UI is last on my list. Functionality and functional features are priority. enough icandy. gimme meat and potatoes.

my 2 cents... take it or leave it
     
andreas_g4
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: adequate, thanks.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2004, 03:30 PM
 
Originally posted by movabi:
my 2 cents... take it or leave it
     
ZackS
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Hell
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2004, 03:47 PM
 
Originally posted by Developer:
We can only hope that Apple will never model iTunes after the iPod and replace the scrollbars with a scroll wheel.
I know you're joking but they already learned their lesson about this with Quicktime Player 4.
     
MindFad
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 9, 2004, 03:55 PM
 
Originally posted by andreas_g4:
As you can see here, the Apple "screenshots" (at least this one) have an resolution of 288 dpi, which is 72 x 4. If it was a complete mock-up, wouldn't it rather be 300 dpi?
I have no clue how those images are made, but it seems for me as they are just using the original UI data, rendered four times the usual resolution. What du you think?
That's exactly why it's 288�to keep their scaling consistent. It's what I would do anyway, if I were in charge of making the mockups. Makes sense.
     
ReggieX
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 10, 2004, 02:11 PM
 
Originally posted by Immortal K-Mart Employee:
Final Cut Pro has had a different dark look since the OS9 days and it has not influencing the rest of the UI.
That's also because it was a Macromedia product. I mean, check the serial number entry box and the preferences dialog. Totally Macromedia crap
     
Disgruntled Head of C-3PO
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: In bits and pieces on Cloud City
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 10, 2004, 02:39 PM
 
Originally posted by ReggieX:
That's also because it was a Macromedia product. I mean, check the serial number entry box and the preferences dialog. Totally Macromedia crap
Well duh. Does that also mean that since Garageband has wood panelling that the 10.4 Finder will look the same?
"Curse my metal body, I wasn't fast enough!"
     
Insecure bone
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 10, 2004, 05:44 PM
 
I dont think Apple is going to make the brushed wood look in the next version. you have to give apple credit, because they're really clever, so i think this look is just for garage band, because it's themed for the garage look and feel. i think apple is going to adopt the dark metal look, like in the pro apps, because mac os x is heading toward a much more distinguished look.
     
Misanthrope
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 10, 2004, 09:47 PM
 
Originally posted by andreas_g4:


As you can see here, the Apple "screenshots" (at least this one) have an resolution of 288 dpi, which is 72 x 4. If it was a complete mock-up, wouldn't it rather be 300 dpi?
I have no clue how those images are made, but it seems for me as they are just using the original UI data, rendered four times the usual resolution. What du you think?
I looked at the image, and I think it's a total PS mockup. Certain elements just don't seem...real. It's hard to describe, but there's too much detail in that photo. I could be wrong, but someone with a keen eye may want to compare this PR photo with the final product. I'm quite confident differences will be spotted.


"Do I need to draw a diagram for you then to tell you that nerdy 16-17 year olds, fat chicks and old men turn my crank then? Will you understand it then or don't you follow still chris." - Landos Mustache
     
swiz
GUI Punk
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: S.E. Mitten
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 11, 2004, 01:32 AM
 
Originally posted by Misanthrope:
I looked at the image, and I think it's a total PS mockup. Certain elements just don't seem...real. It's hard to describe, but there's too much detail in that photo. I could be wrong, but someone with a keen eye may want to compare this PR photo with the final product. I'm quite confident differences will be spotted.
Most of the PR images have the Photoshop paths embedded in them, so yes, some aspects are partially Photoshop created. The G5 images for one.

24" AlumiMac 2.4ghz C2D, 4g Ram, 300g HD, 750g USBHD • 80g iPod • 160g ATV • iPhone 3g
     
MindFad
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 11, 2004, 03:19 AM
 
Originally posted by swiz:
Most of the PR images have the Photoshop paths embedded in them, so yes, some aspects are partially Photoshop created. The G5 images for one.
Yeah, almost all of the lighting on Apple's PR product images is faked or fixed up. Hell, even the reflections on the iMacs handle are faked.
     
kovacs
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 11, 2004, 04:44 AM
 
Look at these widgets they look great !

     
andreas_g4
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: adequate, thanks.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jan 16, 2004, 04:57 PM
 
Originally posted by swiz:
Most of the PR images have the Photoshop paths embedded in them, so yes, some aspects are partially Photoshop created. The G5 images for one.
Right, didn't think of that. I remember a shot of the 17" iMac that had the display paths from the 15" model.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:37 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,