 |
 |
Another 3D file browser...
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
I thought that the kind of gadget some of us can have some fun with...
About 10 minutes, but that's a diiferent concept than 3DOSX...
3D Space-VSF
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BrisVegas, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
wow, nice find. 
very different to 3D OS X...
but i still don't know what to think about this...
i'm going to give SphereXP a try some time as well. yes, that's for Win XP... i haven't tried it yet, but i'm wanting somehting like that for OS X.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yikes, this kinda...sucks.
I do appreciate them taking the time to try something new, however.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Iowa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, interesting concept...I think one of the problems is that any 3D file browser is such a take-off from conventional file-browsing that it is going to take a fundamental change in how we view our file systems in our minds for it to really take hold. In the meantime, it is kind of fun to play with for a little while...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: N.Y.C.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am quite interested in these endevours
I think that there is a correlation between 3D file browsing and transparency (longhorn) and touch screen...whatever that nobody has quite figured out yet...
ie a more physically intuitive/gamelike interaction design...
But I have tried this and it's just not quite there...I am not sure altogether why...
maybe the 3d Mapping, maybe the processor speed...
?
Beats me, but I am glad people are doing this work
LeBonToon
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
The Graphic Mac: Tips, tricks and commentary for design, Adobe and Mac OSX.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
It needs piles! It would be soo cool with that feature! Otherwise ery very nice start
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SoCal
Status:
Offline
|
|
Who needs a file browser now that we've got Quicksilver? (And soon Spotlight.) Takes a fraction of a second to find something using QS, and I've even taught my parents how to use it (which is saying something). No more shuffling through dozens of damnable folders anymore.
I tired this out a few days ago though � it was pretty neat, much more usable than 3DOSX. Still, I think typing-based-searching will easily take over the OS arena within a few years, because it's too darn efficient to ignore.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2004
Location: BrisVegas, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Sage:
Who needs a file browser now that we've got Quicksilver?
yeah, you can just trash Finder, dont' need any of this file browser nonsense now that QuickSilver is so good. 
yeah, right... 
i can't get QS to search my stuff properly, and even if it could find any document i wanted, there would still be need for a file browser, for instance if you want to see all of the files relating to a particular project.
and since there will always be the need for a file browser, might as well have some sort of easy to use, intuitive 3D browser...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top